“Alex Bell” or “Ron Peters” – Go back to where you came from!

Every now and again we get a scumtrooper straight from Central Casting. This week’s offering is Alex Bell. All he lacks are the laughable tatts and the comical regalia.

Alex Bell Facebook

What do we know about this rising star? Well firstly, he is from the UK. So it is quite likely he is not a citizen as yet. Perhaps people might like to contact DIAC and express their concerns.

After all, we don’t want any dodgy imports here, having just rid ourselves of one of Alex’s fellow London racists. Nor are we racist against Brits ourselves. We love them!

Monty Python team

Brits we love

We also need to have to have those regular visits from easy-beat Rugby, Rugby League and cricket teams as well to help make Strayans feel really patriotic.

But Alex has made a really bad start to his Australian experience when he defamed a poster here at the blog.

Alex Bell spam post

Next he decided to monster this poster whom he did not like. And magically his name changed to “Ron Peters”. Poor little fail boy…doesn’t even know who he is.

Alex Bell AKA Ron Peters

Next he made himself unwelcome at a couple of anti-racist sites. This time as “Alex Bell”.

Dodgy stats

For those who do not know, anyone can plot a professional-looking graph via Excel and present it as having come from an official site. The far right do this all the time.

Try it if you don’t believe us – for instance you may want to plot … the inverse relationship between penis size and membership of fringe extremist groups

Alex Bell vilifies

Using a pejorative term describing people of African descent which has no academic credibility except at Scumfront? Delightful fellow what?

And Alex’s two friends? Well here’s Mad Angela the Christian Soldier, wielding her pointy Bible to rid the world of gays and lesbians.

Angela Usher

And we all know and love Scott Pengelly, Melton’s most notorious shut-in, vestal virgin for the “white race”, devotee of Asian pick-up sites, the only person ever granted his own thread by a bountiful and generous TAB.
 
Scott Pengelly

Oh look, magic…

Alex Bell Ron Peters
 

So let’s join together to make Alex…or Ron… feel really unwelcome.

Fuck off tosser, we’re full!!

Asylum Seekers: The Myths are getting Bigger

ayslum seekers

MYTH 1 : “Asylum seekers are illegal immigrants”

WRONG!!

Where are the real illegal immigrants from?

It seems the majority are from Britain.

The British illegal immigrants

But just look how quickly the asylum-seeker haters come to their defence. For instance “Sandra” is getting quite passionate about the supposed “rights” of deported EDL troublemaker and illegal non-citizen Martin Brennan.

Sandra Rogic

MYTH 2: “Asylum seekers take things that belong to us”

Look After Australia First

WRONG!!

Asylum seekers don't receive benefits

And please note the signature at the end of the letter.

We dealt with this matter here. Not our fault if the bogotariat are too thick to be able to read and comprehend facts.

MYTH 3: “Asylum seekers are criminals/terrorists/economic refugees”

Brad Draugr Herman hates asylum seekers

Dumb Kurt

Errr…

WRONG!!

MYTH 4: “Asylum seekers take entitlements from the homeless/pensioners/Indigenous people/[insert name of disadvantaged group here]”

The bogots love to pretend they really care about disadvantaged people. They don’t – unless they can use them as a stalking horse to attack refugees and asylum seekers. Here’s social policy expert Sharon Allen arguing with an opponent:

Sharonand her myths

Sharon and her myths2

Oh dear, poor homeless if they have someone as lacking in compassion as Sharon “working” for them.

And like her opponent, we really don’t believe a word of what Sharon is saying.

Here are some  facts on Canberra’s homeless. Seems the problem lies with the ACT Government’s allocation of resources – nothing to do with asylum seekers.

Back in August last year, Nielsen polled 1400 Australians on the question of the major parties’ asylum seeker policies.

Voters reject refugee plans of both parties
Phillip Coorey
August 16, 2011

MORE than half the population believes asylum seekers arriving by boat should be landed and processed in Australia, contradicting the policies of the two main parties, which advocate processing in a third country, a poll finds.

The latest Herald/Nielsen poll of 1400 people was taken from Thursday night to Saturday evening, after the High Court imposed an injunction on the Malaysia plan.
The poll finds 53 per cent of voters preferred that asylum seekers arriving by boat be allowed to land in Australia to be assessed.

Only 28 per cent felt they should be sent to another country for assessment, the approach of Labor and the Coalition, while 15 per cent said the arrivals should be ”sent back out to sea”.
Of those who thought asylum seekers should be processed in Australia, 55 per cent thought they should be held in detention while being processed, and 41 per cent thought they should be allowed to live in the community.
Half of those who opted for assessment in Australia or a third country thought those found to be refugees should be allowed to settle in Australia permanently.
The Greens are the only party that advocates processing asylum seekers in Australia. The government’s policy centres on Malaysia and Manus Island, Papua New Guinea, while the Coalition would send the asylum seekers to Nauru.
A Labor MP from Victoria, Anna Burke, spoke out yesterday against her party’s Malaysia plan. ”I’m very concerned that we can’t really guarantee the safety of the individuals, the 800 who will be sent there,” she told the ABC.

Source