Party for Fascism Freedumb and the pathway to fail

Nicholas Folkes and his fast-diminishing fan club, now called the Party for Freedumb or something equally dopey, are the Don Quixotes of the far right.

quixote

Don Niqi does the stupid again

You would think that at some stage some kind person would take them aside and point out what muppets they are. But instead they keep on the same pathway to fail.

The pathway to fail in this instance was Sussex Street Sydney on Sunday 20th June outside the closed-for-the-weekend Labor Council office during World Refugee Week. And with typical strategic foresight the Pffs decided to hold their gigantic big huge awesome demo. Something about visa overstayers…?

1. on a Sunday in the middle of winter
2. in what is effectively a narrow one way street

To top it all off Sussex Street is almost in Chinatown. How the bogots must have been filled with fear to see the thousands of local and overseas Asians who flock there at weekends to sample the retail and culinary delights of nearby Haymarket.

Here is Niqi’s pathetic little hate gathering.

Thousands  Hundreds A few Muslim haters shivering outside an evil green socialist left-wing building with a blue car.

Thousands Hundreds A few Muslim haters shivering outside an evil green socialist left-wing building with a blue car.

Here is the real Rally for Refugees, attracting hundreds of people held at the Town Hall on the same day and featuring well-known guest speakers.

We can tell you who featured at Sussex Street. Niqi’s new Sancho Panza, Ralphski.

pffdemo15

Here’s Ralphski all kitted up in hate gear. He has also come to our attention before.

Ralph also likes to contact women he doesn’t even know. That must be why he is currently desperate and dateless. Note the breathtaking sophistication of the message.

pffdemo16a

Ah well he always has Niqi. Niqi doesn’t like women all that much either.

Now Niqi was it really fair to subject those 15 odd definitely mentally impaired racists to the horrors of multicultural Sydney with all those scary people of a different colour and all that delicious foreign food when all they want to do on a cold Sunday is to huddle at home like troo Strayans and watch people whom they think look like them on the telly?

And always the copycats, they cannot even copy-and-paste their own party correctly. Niqi has long insisted that his new Facebook group party is modelled on his hero Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party.

However there is one glaring difference. Wilders it seems has no problems with GLBTI rights and same sex marriage. Everything with his limited issue party is subsumed to the task of ridding the Netherlands and Europe of “teh_mooslems”.

By contrast Niqi’s PFF party is all over the shop with “policies” on everything grabbed from a motley array of far right sewers including Fred Nile’s Christian Democrats, Niqi’s former home the Australian Pathetic Party, the League of Rights, One Nation… you get the picture?

We won’t bore you with a link but if you want to have a laugh just Google “Party for Freedom”.

Niqi has also been somewhat out of favour with certain other nutzis because he has an Asian wife – despite his well-publicised vilification of Filipino women and his championing of white exceptionalism.

You can read all about it here

And here’s a demo evaluation from some senior sources in the Pff

Some Muslim haters spin some yarns

Some Muslim haters spin some yarns

Six Bogans Wear Burqas to, um… Prove A Point

Some pockets of bogot lowlife trash are celebrating tonight after firmly believing that their burqa stunt in Sydney has proved a point – that people just don’t know who is under a burqa.

Well no shit.

We’ve been through this burqa conversation a million times, but here goes again – this time we’ll keep it brief:

* If balaclavas have been banned in banks, how come bank robbers still choose to wear them while robbing banks?

* If burqas can hide bombs, how come there have been no burqa related suicide bomb attempts or successes in Australia, ever?

* If cargo pants can hide deadly weapons, how come these aren’t banned?

* If burqas oppress women, how does limiting their freedom to dress liberate them?

* If a woman is forced to wear a burqa by her oppressive husband, how is it liberating for them to ban burqas in public? Wouldn’t that then confine those women to stay inside their homes?

* If the statistical majority of sexual assaults are committed by those known to the victim, what’s the point of wearing a burqa to sexually assault someone?

* If the main factor in physical abuse and domestic violence is alcohol, how come we are blaming Muslims who don’t drink alcohol, and women who wear burqas, who generally don’t go into pubs or liquor stores?

* If wearing the burqa supposedly hides one away from society, how come they stand out in a crowd? Surely if a person wanted to blend into a crowd or secretly hide their identity they’d wear some dark glasses, a hat, and maybe some form of cosmetic hindrance.

* If terrorism is such a massive threat in our country that we need to be scared about women wearing burqas, how come we aren’t scared of dying of heart failure, drink driving, road accidents, lung cancer or any of the other major killers?

* If terrorism performed by women wearing burqas is such a threat, how come I have more chance of being killed by being struck by lightning (odds: 40,000 : 1)?

* If we are concerned about women wearing burqas hiding out in female changerooms, how come we never see them in female changerooms? Surely we’d notice them sitting there, doing nothing.

* If we are so concerned about women wearing burqas and watching women at the beach, how come we haven’t paid homage to the trillions of gigabytes worth of porn freely accessible on the Internet?

Anyways, back to the dropkicks that took the day off ‘work’ to wear burqas around the city of Sydney. Let’s see what else they proved today!

1. When walking through the city wearing clothes meant to conceal – partying and forming a conga line won’t convince many people to accept your claims that you could be hiding a nuclear weapon.

2. When you’re allowed to buy a drink at the pub, it’s not your attire that’s being judged, but your behaviour. By proving that service will still continue in a true blue Aussie pub, these burqa clad clowns proved that most Australians don’t really care about the burqa issue. What we didn’t see here was how pub staff would have reacted if the burqa wearers were intoxicated. They probably would have reacted in the same way as if any other member of the general public was intoxicated, and asked them to leave.

3. When six idiots ponce into a public bar wearing burqas asking for alcohol, it is proven that the person behind the bar safely assumes that it’s merely a dress-up piss-take camera-stunt, as devout Muslims don’t generally drink alcohol.

4. When you try to suppress a freedom in order to promote freedom, you prove yourself to be as impotent as the man who started a war against an ideology (War on Terror?). By wearing a mask while following regular laws, you’ve proven that your identity doesn’t matter until such time as you disobey the law.

5. When six dopes wander the streets in dress up with a cameraman right next to them the whole time, it is now proven that anyone who witnesses this spectacle will assume that it’s merely an offensive joke.

Enter burqa fuck-up no.1, Nicholas Folkes + offended Arabic men:

Nicholas Hunter Folkes is the son of a Russian refugee, and the brother of fellow minion Vera Kolesnikoff, and he is a racist. He represents a ‘political party’ that over 98% of Australians either haven’t heard of, or don’t like. He’s a racist, but he thinks his actions and words are an integral part of what will get this country out of ‘trouble’.

(Folkes discussing his love for the White Australia policy.)

(Folkes choking on his own shit.)

(Folkes being smirked and stared at by an audience of people with IQs higher than his miserable 20.)

Here’s Folkes at one of his previous miserable fail-rallies:

And here are some of the things he’s publicly said over the past few years:

Enter burqa-bozo no.2, Sergio Redegalli.

This is Sergio’s second appearance in the burqa. His first appearance was when he donned the burqa to enter a ladies toilet, once again trying to ‘prove a point’. Was he noticed? Probably. Did he get a look at women urinating? As much as he desperately wanted to, it’s pretty clear that unless he managed to burqa-stealth his way into an actual cubicle, all he saw were closed doors and ‘engaged’ signs.

Enter niqab-nobody no.3, ‘Betty’ – Diane Leigh Renard.

Just like her Facebook profiles, Betty chooses anonymity for this 7 News interview. Oh well, she’ll be dead soon anyway – she looks like she’s about 90. Here’s some of Betty’s wonderful design work:

And here’s her hideous face: (Note the wart next to the left eye)… One has to wonder – does she have a poison apple in her basket?

The other three failed to get any airtime, so have remained as completely irrelevant as they were when they first headed out the door this morning.

So there you have it. Three over-the-hill nobodies, completely phobic about the less than 0.2% of our population that actually cover their faces. Not one of them will come to our blog, so here are the questions none of them can answer, one last time:

* If balaclavas have been banned in banks, how come bank robbers still choose to wear them while robbing banks?

* If burqas can hide bombs, how come there have been no burqa related suicide bomb attempts or successes in Australia, ever?

* If cargo pants can hide deadly weapons, how come these aren’t banned?

* If burqas oppress women, how does limiting their freedom to dress liberate them?

* If a woman is forced to wear a burqa by her oppressive husband, how is it liberating for them to ban burqas in public? Wouldn’t that then confine those women to stay inside their homes?

* If the statistical majority of sexual assaults are committed by those known to the victim, what’s the point of wearing a burqa to sexually assault someone?

* If the main factor in physical abuse and domestic violence is alcohol, how come we are blaming Muslims who don’t drink alcohol, and women who wear burqas, who generally don’t go into pubs or liquor stores?

* If wearing the burqa supposedly hides one away from society, how come they stand out in a crowd? Surely if a person wanted to blend into a crowd or secretly hide their identity they’d wear some dark glasses, a hat, and maybe some form of cosmetic hindrance.

* If terrorism is such a massive threat in our country that we need to be scared about women wearing burqas, how come we aren’t scared of dying of heart failure, drink driving, road accidents, lung cancer or any of the other major killers?

* If terrorism performed by women wearing burqas is such a threat, how come I have more chance of being killed by being struck by lightning (odds: 40,000 : 1)?

* If we are concerned about women wearing burqas hiding out in female changerooms, how come we never see them in female changerooms? Surely we’d notice them sitting there, doing nothing.

* If we are so concerned about women wearing burqas and watching women at the beach, how come we haven’t paid homage to the trillions of gigabytes worth of porn freely accessible on the Internet?