Weeding Out Neighbourhood Terrorists With Good Old Aussie Slappers

Here are some of the 136 people that ‘liked’ or commented on the idea of Muslim men committing suicide:

I shudder to imagine what most of these shockers look like naked…

82 thoughts on “Weeding Out Neighbourhood Terrorists With Good Old Aussie Slappers

  1. All of these thought crimes have been reported to the Ministry of Truth. If we stick together and report thought crimes to the Thought Police, these criminals shall be denied the ability to earn a living. Ignorance is Strength. Freedom is Slavery. War is Peace

    • You’re an idiot. Please tell me how saying stupid things publically online is somehow sancrosanct, whereas saying something stupid in public is free for all to commentate on.

    • While we,re at it, Ingsoc, how is this site responsible for people losing thier jobs? The employers make the decision, and the posters make the comment. If the comment is fine and acceptable, they you should be complaining to the employers. If the comment is unacceptable, then it’s the person themselves that should be held responsible.

      Unless you’re telling me that people should not be held responsible for their own comments. And if tha’ts truly the case, you better get someone to hold your hand when you cross the street, because the world is a cruel place for people who don’t take responsibility for their own actions.

  2. I’d like to know where these dumbasses get the idea about the suicide. In Islam suicide is one of the worst sins ever. See a naked woman that you shouldn’t don’t look. Simple. I should know…..I am a muslim man.

    • Typical isn’t it? They mix a little fact with fiction.

      Although don’t most religons say that “it is a sin to see a woman naked, other than their wife”
      Oh wait, muslim’s are extremists, so naturally they would kill themselves after seeing another woman naked…

      This logic boggles the mind… with its simplicity of stupidity…

      • yup I am sure the bible says “do not covet thy neighbours wife”. So if she isn’t your direct neighbour it is ok?

  3. I agree with JM.

    ” Unless you’re telling me that people should not be held responsible for their own comments. And if tha’ts truly the case, you better get someone to hold your hand when you cross the street, because the world is a cruel place for people who don’t take responsibility for their own actions.”

    Providing of course the same standards apply to the people who use this site. Which they do of course.

      • “We have no problems owning what we say because we are not intolerant abusive bogots.”

        Are you for real? you are intolerant of anything that you don’t agree with, not just racist or derogatory remarks, but everything, you pigeon hole people who while their comments are a bit over the top, are not all the so called Bogans, you make them out to be. As for no abuse, get real, I have pages of the stuff you lot have posted that is pure vitriol, even on this thread you have the comments about rolling people back into the ocean, and “so well written = wankers” from karinakarinamedia, so apart from being hyopcrites you are suffering memory loss, as you screen shot all the shit you don’t like, others are doing the same of you and your site, and spreading that around, so it cuts both ways.

        • I have a job, a great job, you would be jealous of my job as entails working on beautiful Lady Elliot or Fraser Islands. I have shift work so yeah I can access my computer more often than a 9 to 5 drone.

        • “So you don’t have a job since you can spend all day trawling the net looking for our posts?
          What an achiever.” = ad hominem mindemadeup

        • “The irony of you lambasting our criticism of trolls on a post where personal attacks are the primary focus.
          You are strawman personified.”

          If I was suggesting your criticism of trolls was incorrect based on your use of fallacies then I would be presenting a straw man. But I haven’t done so. I have only informed you of your use of fallacy & your inability to engage in discussion without it.

          You on the other hand are attempting to present your detractors criticisms as false with the use of fallacies.

        • Hmm yes, by eluding to one instance of a personal attack out of 660+ posts and 19,858 comments at our blog, you’ve managed to identify a deficiency in my debating credentials because the personal attacks withdraw from ‘discussions’ with known trolls.

          “…attempting to present your detractors criticisms as false…”, no not necessarily. Just trying to piss them off, you know, show them how fucking pathetic they are.

          .

        • I will, MR, thanks. And when I learn a new word I will use it repeatedly, just to prove how much smarter I now am.

        • “It’s quite easy to educate yourself, Greg. Try reading occasionally. I recommend it.”

          Did somebody say ad hominem? lulz. Well done MR.

        • “MR, owned again.”

          I’m flattered you would go to the trouble. How much did you pay for the pleasure of owning me?

    • Absolutely, SlipperySam/Ingsoc. However I notice that the consequences to people featuring on TAB website, and those who post on TAB website differ significantly when it comes to legality.

      So those who are featured here have at worse, humiliation, loss of a potential income source-negative consequences, but truly within the law. However, those who post here, myself included, have received, rather than contacting the companies we work for and telling our employers “This person posts on an anti-racist website”, instead we receive threats of violence, sexual assault, and death against both the posters and our families.

      You may see a significant difference between the two. For instance, the former is entirely legal. The second is a criminal offence. Do you think threats should be okay, SlipperySam/Ingsoc, and think the law should change, but only for you?

        • JM seems to think that identfying bogans on this site does not put them at risk of physical harm. Of course it does.

        • Huh?

          “JM” is a man. You obviously have the wrong JM.

          Anyway the left aren’t crims like the far right and they don’t attack, harass and intimidate people. We leave that up to you lot.

        • The whole purpose of this site is to “attack, harass and intimidate people”. I don’t see how the gender of JM is relevant. Your stupidity does your cause more harm than good.

        • The purpose of this site is to give the intolerant and the prejudiced the “freedom of hate speech” they so crave. So we republish their hateful obnoxious comments on social media right here.

          If there are repercussions as a result of their hateful, unethical and usually illegal rantings then that’s tough. They should keep their hate to themselves.

          No one said you had to come here and participate anyway if you don’t like what you do here.

        • Where did I say that, Ingsoc? And has there been any cases of a person being targetted for threats of violence, rape and death because they were featured on TAB? Find me one-please! After all-correct me if I’m wrong, but TAB does not publish home addresses or phone numbers, correct-so how would the threats even occur?

          And while we’re at it, are you saying that it’s okay to threaten, if someone else is threatening? Kinda like “If those people do a terrible thing-that means it’s okay for me to do a terrible thing”-which would mean you have no internal moral compass-which is a bit worrying, isn’t it?

  4. ” We have no problems owning what we say ”

    That’s good to hear. I guess that includes your preparedness to “own” any consequences then to does it? Great. We’re in accord.

    • Absolutely, SlipperSam. I’m happy to own any consequences, as long as they stay within in the laws of this great country of ours.

      Or do you think you should be allowed to break the law if you think someone “deserves it”?

  5. Racist and sexist, all in one! As to the women who ‘love’ it, don’t complain about your misogynist husband who makes you cook/clean/fuck, you practically gave consent by approving this kind of behaviour.

        • 0.o
          You seem to have a certain lack of cognitive ability mindmadeup. Unsurprising given your previous efforts here.

        • Summary for the slow:

          * If you don’t want your racist comments made public, don’t type them on the public Internet.
          * If your employer fires you because of the racist comments you made in public while identifying yourself as an employee, that’s their decision and one most likely grounded in social media policy.
          * If you keep your racism to your private circle of friends and family, you don’t bring down the reputation of the organisation you work for.

          Apparently there is fallacy in those points raised. Please specify.

        • *Sigh* let me point your fallacies out to you for the third time mindemadeup. I know you can’t help your deficit but it is frustrating having to spell the obvious out over & over.

          “So you don’t have a job since you can spend all day trawling the net looking for our posts?
          What an achiever.” = ad hominem mindemadeup – your response “cool story bro”

          “Just like you are Pongsock” = Ad hominem to quoque mindmadeup – your response “yawwwwwwwwn”

          Of course taking your comments out of context doesn’t help, but scrolling up to read them in place does.

        • * “So you don’t have a job since you can spend all day trawling the net looking for our posts?
          What an achiever.” = ad hominem mindemadeup – your response “cool story bro”

          —-> It is more of a question than an assumption. More of an assumption than a belief. No fallacy here.

          * Pongsock – no idea. Another admin?

          Any passing comment on the plethora of personal attacks that this website has highlighted? No?

          Strawman.

        • “Done. If you keep trolling with stupid comments we might just remove all of them.
          Address the issues raised or GTFO.”

          Oh congratulations. You managed to remove the comment from this thread & leave the one I made outside of the thread. Completely the opposite of what I requested you to do.

          Fallacies & stupidity. The two often go hand in hand.

        • Another admin perhaps?

          Perhaps you’d like to address the point raised over the personal attacks that have been highlighted BY this blog? You are more than welcome to continue to offer your own personal attacks, as you’ve done since you arrived. But we reserve the right to criticise the fuck out of anyone that drops by to defend discriminators.

    • “Perhaps you’d like to address the point raised over the personal attacks that have been highlighted BY this blog? You are more than welcome to continue to offer your own personal attacks, as you’ve done since you arrived. But we reserve the right to criticise the fuck out of anyone that drops by to defend discriminators.”

      Now here we have a strawman argument. My criticism of your inability to discuss without the use of fallacy does not logically lead to the conclusion that I am defending discriminators. Classic misrepresentation of my position. Classic strawman.

    • Summary of MR
      “I actually have nothing to say about the actual contents of whats posted but am really pissed off at the person/s who posted it”

      Fuck off you petty moron

      • Summary of Spike.

        “I actually have nothing to say about the actual contents of what MR posted, but am really pissed of at MR for their comments”

        Pot, kettle, black, Spike.

      • MR points out that MMU makes constant use of fallacy during discussions. MMU constantly proves MR’s position with strawman usage as per above comment from MMU.

        MMU displays almost constant inability to engage in productive discourse due to their favouring of said fallacies.

  6. Totally owned again “MMU”. I used to believe there was only one admin and [name redacted] was just too petrified to admit it was in fact him. But now I see there are more than 1 admin here. This MMU is the one with learning difficulties.

    • LOL! ‘Owned’?

      Some douche turns up, says nothing intelligent, but points out that we barrage trolls with abuse and criticism as though we didn’t already know.

      Whoaaaa owned!

  7. Hi there! I came here and posted as mindmadeup! I’m actually a troll and I spent about half an hour of my sorry life typing up a 750 word rant in an attempt to be funny and *giggle* clever.

    Sadly, the real mindmadeup is currently editing the fuck out of my pathetic waste of 30+ minutes and now I look like an idiot.

    Oh well, back to fapping.

What do YOU think about this?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s