Muslims and Asians Breed Faster = Sharia Law in Australia

Poor old deluded ‘Alicia Ryan’. Because Muslims and Asians ‘breed faster’, they must be kept out of parliament. Alicia thinks that Asians and Muslims are only having children because they want to infiltrate parliament to install Sharia Law. And Asians? WTF? Sharia Law?

“WHY CANT (sic) PEOPLE SEE REALITY DIDNT (sic) (sic) THEY STUDY MATHS OR WERE THEY NOT VERY GOOD AT IT (sic)”

Here are some facts for you Alicia:

* 37% of the 341,000 Muslims in Australia were born here, and over 80% have high proficiency in English.

* Only one third of Australian Muslims speak Arabic.

* Despite being in Australia for over 100 years, Muslims (of all descents) represent less than 2% of our entire population.

Go away.

22 thoughts on “Muslims and Asians Breed Faster = Sharia Law in Australia

  1. Um. Polls show a very small percent of muslims want sharia law. If support for Sharia law was growing, it would come from CONVERTS rather than migrants or children of muslims.

  2. long live the secular state, long live democracy and long live Australia!! No to SHARIA LAW! and MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL!!! lots of love a lapsed christian xo

  3. On behalf of the rational, mannered and knowledgeable society of Australia I would like to apologize to all muslims living in Australia who have experienced implicit, subtle or explicit hatred. Period.

  4. It is good Wakeup wrote “apologize to all muslims living in Australia who have experienced implicit, subtle or explicit hatred. Period”

    But don’t people find strange they wrote this, even those it seems they are defending another racist in another forum on this website with “Anyway I will answer it, a person is free to choose their opinions however illogical/morally corrupt they may be”?

      • Yes people are free to choose their opinions. And yes “They are not free to broadcast hate speech on any media” and if someone is racist or bigoted – keep it to yourself.

        But reading their own comments “a person is free to choose their opinions however illogical/morally corrupt they may be” wakeup think racists are free to broadcast hate speech on any media?

      • In my comment were the words expressed or broadcast used? NO

        A person can form the opinion… but not express it so as to stop others from being scarred, belittled.

        Why are you attempting to manipulate my views?
        You are implying that i am pro-racism and bigot by promoting my own freedoms to critique and question racist claims through the use of the word “free”.

        I thought this was a forum for sensible discourse whereby experiences could be shared and bigoted views challenged through reason and logic I was wrong
        It was nice as short as it lasted.

        Laters

    • As per usual your quote has been taken out of context.

      A person is free to express their views. This statement does not imply a agreement with all views expressed by any persons. Let me give you a clear example improvised from a past article on TAB.

      Mary says everyone has the right to free speech and their opinions.

      Bob says all Muslims are terrorists and should be burned with tyres in their necks.

      Since Mary agrees with Bob’s right to express his views she would like to engage in genocide.

      This is the logic you are using. It does not make sense. (1) It is akin to a politician reiterating a basic human right – freedon of speech. (2) A party supporter inciting racial hatred and genocide. Thus since the party supporter based his opinion on (1) the politician agrees with the party supporter without explicit expression. You are employing a fallacious argument

      Furthermore i criticised bigoted views by describing them as morally corrupt.

      I rest my case and ask you to employ reasoned logical arguments when attempting productive discourse. In parliament, to further the anti-racism cause only reason logical debates work… not baseless statements plastered without any glue.

      So inorder to discourage bigoted views explicitly degrading others based on gender, ethinicity, nationality, etc.the above mentioned are required.

  5. As per usual wakeup replies without proof reading especially to falsely claims others employ reasoned logical arguments. When It is them who doesn’t come up with “reasoned logical arguments” like on one hand saying sorry to Muslims for what racists has said or done and then on the other hand defend a racist with “Anyway I will answer it, a person is free to choose their opinions however illogical/morally corrupt they may be”.

  6. Are you really criticising bigoted views by describing them as morally corrupt, even those you wrote and I quote “a person is free to choose their opinions however illogical/morally corrupt they may be”?

    • Perhaps the point being made is that a person is free to have their own opinions however immoral and corrupt – BUT as soon as they make those opinions public it’s fair game to criticise, or in extreme cases – prosecute.

      • It isn’t extreme to prosecute… they have violated laws designed to protect individual liberty and deserve to be punished … however severe

  7. Now back to forum subject and let wakeup, wakeup to work out where they went wrong by not proof reading their own comments, especially to see they haven’t employ reasoned logical arguments.

What do YOU think about this?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s