So Just What Is Multiculturalism?

So, shrill the triumphalists of the conservative press, multiculturalism is dead. It has proven to be a complete disaster.

We know this because we have it from no lesser authorities than the prime ministers of both Great Britain and Germany. David Cameron claims that multiculturalism promotes division rather than unity; Angela Merkel asserts that it has utterly failed. What else is there to say?

Well, just one thing, and Malcolm Fraser has dared to say it: they don’t know what they are talking about, because neither of their countries has ever had a policy of multiculturalism.

What they have had is immigration programs – or perhaps the lack of them – which have collapsed in a heap of unintended consequences and social unrest, because no one ever tried to make them balanced and inclusive.

In Germany’s case, the trouble was the so called guest worker scheme: cheap labour was imported from countries such as Turkey. No attempt was made to integrate the newcomers, who were never meant to stay for long anyway; but the economy could not do without them, and they formed ghettoes which became the breeding ground for resentment and discontent.

In England the problem arose from the end of the empire; Harold McMillan’s winds of change drove many thousands to seek refuge in what they had been told was their home country. In particular Asians fled from the newly independent countries in Africa, and the floods arrived before the doors could be closed. Now, of course, not even Australians are welcome; but those who made it cannot be deported. Once again, it was totally unplanned and there was no policy to deal with it.

So just what is multiculturalism? The Tory pundits shake their beetled brows and say it is all too difficult, too complex to explain. But in fact it’s so simple you can set it to music:

We are one, but we are many;
And from all the lands of earth we come;
We share a dream and sing with one voice:
You are, I am, we are Australian.

Or, as the Americans put it even more concisely in the motto on their great seal: E Pluribus Unum – out of many, one. The two definitions are especially pertinent because they come from the only two countries ever to have consciously embarked on a policy of multiculturalism and the two which most vigorously defend its outcome.

Both were the result of war. After the first world war the United States opened its doors to the homeless and tempest tossed of Europe and the new world became the great melting pot. The immigrants did not shed their identities – rather they gloried in them. Generations later many still describe themselves as Polish Americans or Italian Americans, but they are all, unarguably, Americans.

The noble experiment had its setbacks: a complicating factor was the presence of a large number of African Americans, involuntary immigrants who were for a long time denied their rightful place. Indigenous Australians, of course, were even more marginalised but being less noticeable could have their problems ignored for longer. But although these issues were important, they did not impede the great march forward.

America was the flag bearer, and after the second world war Australia followed suit. Until then, migration had been predominantly British with a trickle of other mainly northern Europeans. The post war reconstruction scheme broadened the intake to include large numbers of southern Europeans, and ventured into the Middle East. It took another 20 years before the White Australia policy was effectively killed off and multiculturalism officially enshrined as a word and as a law, but in fact the concept had been developing for far longer.

As Immigration Minister Chris Bowen pointed out last week, there is a peculiar genius in the Australian version of multiculturalism and its ties to nation building and citizenship. It is more than an idea whose time has come; it is an inescapable fact of life, and one of which Australia should be hugely proud.

Of course from time to time there are hiccups; the boat people have constituted one, just as the far greater influx of Mexicans has produced rumblings in the United States. But there is no reason to believe that these set backs will be any more severe than others have been in the past – unless, of course, they are exploited by unscrupulous and opportunist politicians for their own cynical advantage. Which brings us, inevitably, to Scott Morrison.

It is uncontested that Morrison raised in shadow cabinet the matter of fear and loathing of Muslims within some Australian communities. It is also pretty certain that he did not go one to say: “Of course such attitudes are divisive and dangerous, born of ignorance and nurtured by bigotry, and we should join with the government and present a united front to do everything possible to educate and inform those who hold such wrong-headed views.”

Given his record, it seems likely that reports that he advised his colleagues to seek out ways to use whatever prejudice and hate they could uncover as weapons to wedge the government are at least pointing in the right direction. After all, this is One Nation policy, and One Nation’s demented Queensland mouthpiece Ian Nelson is already claiming credit for inspiring Morrison’s outburst against bringing asylum seekers to attend the funerals of their close relatives, and for getting Abbott to drop aid to Indonesian schools which teach policies of moderation.

This latter policy will give aid and comfort to Muslim extremists and so incite greater paranoia among the vulnerable in Australia, fully in line with what Morrison is reportedly advocating. And Gary Humphreys, the Liberal senator for the ACT, presented a petition calling for an end to all Muslim immigration. It was signed by just three people, none of whom live within 300 kilometres of Humphrey’s electorate. But, he said smugly, he was just doing his duty.

At least the bastards are consistent.
Mungo Wentworth MacCallum is a political journalist and commentator.

Source

75 thoughts on “So Just What Is Multiculturalism?

  1. Great article.
    In the early 1960s my parents actually travelled to Europe including both Austria and Germany. They both remember sighns outside some businesses that said (words to the effect): “No Turks or Arabs allowed”. And this was as recently as the 1960s…scary.

  2. I have a little story to tell, along the lines of identifying with mixed ethnicities a’la, “Polish Australian”.

    I was in the supermarket with my girlfriend a few weeks back and this old guy comes up to me yelling to me loudly in some language which I hazard a guess as European. I twig and ask, “Polish?” he says, “Of course”, and I reply, “I’m Australian and I don’t speak Polish but my grandparents were Russian and Polish. Do you like Poland?” and he replies, “Haha, why not, it’s the best country on Earth!!!”

    A friendly little thing, we laughed, and that was that… until I visited my mum a little while later and told her the story, imagining how her eyes would well up with tears at the wonderful contribution her parents made to her son’s looks.

    But instead…

    Her: Next time, tell him to go back.
    Me: Huh?
    Her: Tell him to go back to his own country if he feels it’s so great.
    Me: Why?
    Her: They shouldn’t be allowed here. He should go back to his own country.
    Me: *I can see where this is going, and prepare for the worst* Why?
    Her: He has to accept that Australia is the best country on Earth.
    Me: I’m sure he was just being friendly and likes both countries.
    Her: That doesn’t matter. You should have told him. He can go back if he thinks Australia isn’t the best.
    Me: I’m not going to start a race war in the supermarket over a friendly comment.
    Her: You should have told him!
    Me: *face palm*

    I’m an Australian with proud, if unexplored, links to a racial heritage. She’s just an Australian through and through. *eye roll*

  3. David Oldfield: “I’m not here to make chums in the media, or amongst politicians either, I’m here to do my bit, however small, to make our nation ours. That’s right – that it remains ours. The nation I want it to be – for my children. Indeed, the Australia my father would have wanted it to be for his grandchildren”

    How the fuck do we give clowns like this a voice on national radio!? Hell, they get their own station. This surely isn’t far off the propaganda that the nazi’s used to spout on their airwaves..

    • Haha, when I saw David Oldfield’s comments I thought of it as being really positive. I mean when you describe a nation as “ours”, one that we “want for our children”, and that our “grandparents would have wanted for their children” (yes I misheard that one)… the only thing *I* can think of *IS* one that is free for every race.

      (BTW what are we racing for?)

    • The main difference between the Nazi’s and David Oldfield is that the Nazi’s were responsible for millions of deaths.. mass genocide.. to compare anyone’s comments on border security with Nazi ideology is fucking stupid..

      • The Nazis started off somewhere – with a bunch of wackos and malcontents not dissimilar to One Nation and all those other miniscule ratbag parties.

    • those are so bad…

      “Tracker Posted at 2:10 AM Today
      Asians & Italians happily integrate with Australian culture. Muslims are outright racist & don’t want to assimilate – they want to force their beliefs and laws on everyone else.
      Comment 19 of 310”

      this seems to be a good summary of the big lie that conservatives and racists really believe
      how did this happen?

      • It’s disgusting how the majority of comments read on that article.. I sleep easy knowing that it’s just the Shock’s and Geoff’s of the world that sit there consistently posting hate rants under different screen names..

  4. Hahaha. I use my real name. I use my real email address. But keep on with misleading yourself ‘J’. You wouldn’t have any idea. Haha.

  5. “Multi-culturalism” means multi-racialism.
    “Multi-culturalism” means flooding White/Western nations with enormous numbers of foreign nationalities, of different race and culture.
    “Multi-culturalism” means firstly disenfranchising and marginalising the White population of Western countries, then fracturing this society, and allowing multiple cultures, of radically different and divided races and ethnicities to grow in it’s place.
    “Multi-culturalism” is entirely fabricated, and is entirely damaging to the White population, and to Western civilisation.
    “Multi-culturalism” is designed to destroy.

    There are many myths about a so-called “multi-culturalism” in America being told now, that are not accurate.
    The truth is that there was for some time various races, national groups, and their cultures, present in America. The Indians, The Spanish, the French, The African slaves, The Chinese, and a gradual host of European immigrants. The majority population though, for the longest time, was White/British, and most vitally the overall ruling CULTURE was British or post-British American.
    As recently as the 1970’s the White population that were the descendents of the British colonists and founders of America were close to 80% of the population.
    Some waves of immigrants – mostly from Europe – arrived from the late 19th century and throughout the earlier 20th. They were of broadly similar race and culture as the Americans, and the policy was for assimilation.
    A more lax, open, and utlimately destructive immigration policy was only introduced in 1965.
    Whites are now rapidly being made a minority in many parts of America.

    NONE of the social factors in American society and history – aside from British foundation – apply to Australia!
    The Aboriginal/indigenous population of Australia were always numerically small and socially negligeable.
    They were not of the numbers, stature, development, or martial strength of the American Indians.
    There were NO competing colonial powers present in Australia!
    There were NO African slaves brought to Australia!
    From foundation, through settlement, to federation and dominion, and on to commonwealth nation…the population and culture of Australia was White/British.
    Some very small migrant ethnic communities arrived here later on.
    This did not consitute different cultures being present in this continent or within this nation.

    Australia very wisely avoided all of the pitfalls that plagued America.

    It is then an entirely deliberate – and entirely malicious – act for a tri part axis of politics, business, and the left, to now go against the Australian people, Australian history, and the Australian culture, and instigate a process of massive multi-racial immigration, of racial dissolution and social fracture, to engineer “multi-culturalism” for Australia!

    It’s entirely wrong. The vast majority of Australians resolutely oppose it, which is regularly made apparent. This is ruthlessly ignored by the powers orchestrating it. This is why Australians must so stridently speak and stand against such an assault.

    • “Multi-culturalism” means multi-racialism.

      well not really, i’d say north and south korea have a vastly different culture; northern ireland and ireland; etc. etc.

      rest of your points are too stupid to respond to. you’re just a scared, deluded little shit. grow a fucking pair scott.

    • Paranoia is a thought process thought to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion.
      Paranoid thinking typically includes persecutory beliefs concerning a perceived threat towards oneself.

      Persecutory delusions are a delusional condition in which the affected person believes – wrongly – they are being persecuted.
      Specifically, they have been defined as containing two central elements:
      1. The individual thinks that harm is occurring, or is going to occur.
      2. The individual thinks that the persecutor has the intention to cause harm.

      • The Aboriginal/indigenous population of Australia were always numerically small and socially negligeable.

        Yup, compared to a few thousand british when they arrived here, the Indigenous population was around 300,000-700,000 people.

        Ever heard of the Stolen Generation either?

  6. In response to the disaster in Christchurch, New Zealand, Benedict Brogan – the Daily Telegraph’s deputy editor – called for British aid and care for New Zealand, and (a rarity in British and other Western media now) he wrote that “the historic bonds of family and kinship mean something”!
    There is something very important to think about there, for those here that so despise their own kith and kin, people, culture, civilisation and nation, and who so maliciously want to see “multiculturalism” inflicted here.

    • Blah blah blah. Boring as ever, I see.

      “…for those here that so despise their own kith and kin, people, culture, civilisation and nation, and who so maliciously want to see “multiculturalism” inflicted here.”

      You still don’t get it, do you? Just because people respect multiculturalism, that doesn’t mean they hate their own culture. It’s only you xenophobic bigots that see it in such narrow-minded terms.

      • +1

        you’re a dipshit, scott. multiculturalism and help from old allies isn’t mutually exclusive. it’s sad that you must read a lot of news, and draw random fucked up conclusions or totally miss the point.

  7. So-called “multiculturalism” directly involves the fracture, obliteration, and eventual elimination of the host culture, “Ragin Asian”.
    It is, by intent, utter disrespect for the host culture, and it’s population.

    I can guarantee that NONE of those taking advantage of the enforced “multiculturalisation” of Australia and other Western countries would have such disrespect of their own countries and culture!

    So many Australians feel absolutely disrespected by this “multiculturalism”, and yet you’ve the nerve to claim there’s no disrespect to it?
    Australians are repeatedly told now that they have “no culture”, and that they are to sink into the shadows in their own society, and then to die off altogether, and you’ve the nerve to claim that there’s no disrespect intended by mass immigration, multi-racialism, and “multi-culturalism”?

    It is total disrespect!

    The xenophilia of those who have been taught to hate themselves, their families, their people, their history, their civilisation, their race, their nation, and their culture…and who so eagerly welcome such racial devestation and cultural loss, is the problem.
    Those who think that massive amounts of foreign races will be brought into Australia (and other Western nations), and that the Australian people will not raise even an eyebrow about it, accept their premature oblivion without question, and that all of these large numbers of people, of different races, and disparate cultures will thenall just “get along” in blissed out, hands held, multi-coloured (minus white), peaceful bliss…are extremely NARROW MINDED!

    I do not “fear difference”. I fear what is to be legitimately feared.

    • Multiculturalism doesn’t involve anyone taking advantage of anything, you paranoid fart. Where the hell do you get this stuff? It’s pointless arguing with you because you can’t get your head around the concept of mutualism. Instead, you have this strange fixation with the notion of parasitism. Look it up in a biology book, you might learn something new.

      P.S. You’re still boring.

    • Still ignoring the polls in LaDiDa land?

      As an asian it deeply offends me… So im born with an asian face therefore I am destroying the white population.

      That reminds me of these videos:

      then

      then

      • According to Today Tonight Kenny, you’re only destroying the white population if you don’t know who Don Bradman is or what a pavlova is.

      • wow. those asians in the chaser could barely speak english, they were obviously reading prompts as well. You kind of just destroyed your whole argument there anti-bogan. Its a great situation when immigrants to a country dont even have the respect to learn the lingua franca.

        • We weren’t the one who posted the videos. Not sure how you can comment on the English proficiency of a person who appears on television for less than 2 seconds anyway.

          How’s your English going anyway? You missed several capital letters, apostrophes and other punctuation marks there.

      • lol levi, you don’t know shit about fuck. those people could’ve been straight off the plane/boat/whatever, people on international business, international students, tourists, visiting family, your future boss, whatever. i’d like to see how you fare in a non-english speaking country.

        also, no shit they were reading prompts, as if anybody knows who that TT reporter is? hurrrr durrrr

        i always wonder how it goes down in bars or at social events when TT or ACA reporters get introduced to people…

        ‘hey xxx, meet yyy, he’s zzz’s mate and a reporter on ACA / TT”
        “LOL GET A REAL JOB YOU CHUCKLEFUCK”
        *everyone moon walks away*

    • Scott, can you please tell me how multiculturalism has obliterated Australian culture? It it so easy to make sweeping generalisations like this but you have no proof.

      We Aussies still love our sport and a beer and we still are suspiscious of authority. Perhaps we have become a little more PC and no longer use derogatory language to describe those who are different to the norm, but I think most Aussies are as laconic and humourous as ever. Aussies still barrack for the underdog as far as I know. Australian writers and artists are still celebrated.

      One area of our culture, or national identity I guess would be more accurate, that has changed is our willingness to give everone a ‘fair go’. I first noticed this aspect changing when Howard became PM, although it may have been started earlier. It has been noted that Howard was the one who mentioned ‘mateship’ as an Aussie value but not ‘fair-go’.

  8. He did not say “old allies” ‘HURRDURR’, he said “bonds of family and kinship”!
    The relationship between New Zealanders, Australians, and Britons, is deep and absolute…because we are the same people!
    We are kin, we are family, we are blood!
    We are British.
    We are the same people, society, culture, and civilisation.

    We were never merely “allied” to Great Britain.
    In times of war and trouble, Australians and New Zealanders answered the cal of the mother country.

    We’ve got many allies.
    They are not family.
    Allies do not have to send large proportions of their population into each other’s countries, to live…and I’m not talking about military garrisons.

    “Multiculturalism” IS mutually exclusive to all that Mr Brogan wrote about, and which I am confirming. “Multiculturalism” IS utterly exclusive of OUR family, kinship, history, and rightful future!

    Old ENEMIES, and many current enemies, under the guise of this “multiculturalism” are being irresponsibly brought into Australia now (as with elsewhere in the West)…you think THAT is not mutually exclusive to our well being, integrity, happiness, security, stability, homogenity, cohesion, culture and future safety???

    I don’t “draw conclusions”, I see ALL points being made – right and wrong – and I know the truth.

    • {Old ENEMIES, and many current enemies, under the guise of this “multiculturalism” are being irresponsibly brought into Australia now (as with elsewhere in the West)…you think THAT is not mutually exclusive to our well being, integrity, happiness, security, stability, homogenity, cohesion, culture and future safety???}

      Presumably you’re talking about Vietnamese people, as Australia has never been at war with Sri Lanka and is currently at war with Iraq and Afghanistan (and they’re therefore not ‘old’ whatevers).

      What you fail to notice is that humans do not have a hivemind. Not all humans think alike. Most Australians, for instance, do not think like you. Most Vietnamese, particularly the people fleeing Vietnam, do not believe that the government that persecuted them should exist. I daresay all Iraqis fleeing persecution in Iraq do not agree that political violence is a good thing.

      This brings up your second misconception- people flee political violence because they don’t like violence, not because they want to spread it.

      You also fail to notice that Australia, by definition, is not and has never been, monocultural. Australia is a settler society, meaning that many Australians are not white. A significant proportion of Australians never came from Britain; a significant number were here well before Britain was even a country.

    • “In times of war and trouble, Australians and New Zealanders answered the cal of the mother country.’

      And in those times of war we were never treated by Britain as an equal partner. In WWI we were used as canon fodder at Gallipoli, whilst in WWII Prime Minister Curtin had to fight Britain to get troops to defend our own shores. If we were really considered family surely the English would have given us a little more respect?

  9. Thanks, TAB for quoting someone else’s article verbatim.

    “multiculturalism is dead. It has proven to be a complete disaster.
    We know this because we have it from no lesser authorities than the prime ministers of both Great Britain and Germany.”

    And the French President.

    Strange how these people were upstanding examples until they criticised the holy cow.
    Then they can be flippantly dismissed just like a Facebook bogan.

    “they don’t know what they are talking about, because neither of their countries has ever had a policy of multiculturalism.”

    Oh, you have to have an “policy” or otherwise it’s just not there.

    All those people from other ethnic origins would simply vanish, invisible, where did they go, if you don’t have a “policy” about it.

    “What they have had is immigration programs – or perhaps the lack of them ”

    Like we have a “program”?
    50% unskilled in the last decade.
    Some fucking program.

    “which have collapsed in a heap of unintended consequences and social unrest”

    And that can never happen here, because we have a “policy”.

    “cheap labour was imported”

    And that hasn’t happened here?

    “they formed ghettoes which became the breeding ground for resentment and discontent.”

    And that hasn’t happened here?

    “So just what is multiculturalism?”

    “We are one, but we are many” [vomit]
    “E Pluribus Unum – out of many, one.”

    In other words, hogsbottle.

    Cultures are internally “diverse”, but this is an organic development, the result of history.

    What is trumpeted as “diversity” today is a totally artificial fabrication, with no connection to history whatsoever.
    Its only justification: utopian ideology.

    “The noble experiment had its setbacks: a complicating factor was the presence of a large number of African Americans…Indigenous Australians”

    Yes, but now we have a “policy”, they’re all rosy cheeked and skipping down the road.

    And because we have a “policy” that treats all ethnic minorities “equally”, we can ignore the particular histories of African Americans and Aborigines.

    We can condescendingly refuse them a special category of their own.
    Treating them “equally” to newly arrived Arabs and Koreans is actually an insult to their extensive heritage.

    “Until then, migration had been predominantly British with a trickle of other mainly northern Europeans.”

    But don’t let that fool you into thinking “Australians” are White.

    “It is more than an idea whose time has come”

    Or gone.

    “Of course from time to time there are hiccups”

    Gang rapists, hic, terrorist plots, hic, political assassinations, hic, drug gangs, hic, riots, hic.

    “But there is no reason to believe that these set backs will be any more severe than others have been in the past”

    Yes, they will be.
    Because today’s immigrants are not like the past.

    Until the mid-20th century, they were almost exclusively EUROPEAN.
    Whatever problems, there was an underlying commonality that could fill the gaps.

    “he did not go one to say: “Of course such attitudes are divisive and dangerous, born of ignorance and nurtured by bigotry, and we should join with the government and present a united front to do everything possible to educate and inform those who hold such wrong-headed views.””

    And where is the united front against the wrongheaded views of MUSLIMS?

    Views on women, homosexuality and other religions that are “divisive and dangerous, born of ignorance and nurtured by bigotry”.

    I won’t hold my breath.

    • “Strange how these people were upstanding examples until they criticised the holy cow.”

      The Prime Minister of Great Britain and the President of France were never upstanding citizens in my honest opinion.

      “Like we have a “program”?
      50% unskilled in the last decade.
      Some fucking program.”

      50% now? Why do your stats keep increasing? Also, our economy remains strong and our crime rate has not increased. You haven’t as yet identified an actual problem with multiculturalism other than the fact that it brings around *change* because there are more non-white people around.

      “What is trumpeted as “diversity” today is a totally artificial fabrication, with no connection to history whatsoever.
      Its only justification: utopian ideology.”

      Opinion.

      “Treating them “equally” to newly arrived Arabs and Koreans is actually an insult to their extensive heritage.”

      Opinion.

      “Gang rapists, hic, terrorist plots, hic, political assassinations, hic, drug gangs, hic, riots, hic.”

      Aw really? How many of those in Australia are non-white?

      “Yes, they will be.
      Because today’s immigrants are not like the past.”

      You were around in the past were you? The only data you’ve got to go on is that there are more non-whites around these days. And if you want to keep attributing gang rapes, drug gangs and political assassinations to only non-whites then go ahead but we’re all laughing at you.

      “And where is the united front against the wrongheaded views of MUSLIMS?”

      They’re a extremely loud, extremely small minority in Australia.

      “I won’t hold my breath.”

      Please do. For about 3-4 minutes. That should do it.

  10. Is that Mark Goudkamp in the photo? Is that the same Mark GoudKamp who’ll be fronting Newtown criminal court tomorrow on various charges?

    • What a nice picture collection you have, however I’m not the one fronting Newtown criminal court on Monday. Its interesting there is no comment on those appearing, one can only assume you condone political terrorism and violent thuggery. Lets look at the charges your friends will be answering for at Newtown criminal court on Monday:

      A 29-year-old man charged with resist/hinder police and destroy or damage property;
      · A 41-year-old man charged with assault police and resist/hinder police;
      · A 20-year-old man charged with two counts of resist/hinder police and one count of escape police custody;
      · A 24-year-old man charged with assault police and resist/hinder police;
      · A 29-year-old man charged with assault police and resist/hinder police;
      · A 28-year-old man charged with two counts of resist police; and,
      · A 28-year-old man charged with two counts of resist police and one count of assault police.

      • Oh yes, people being arrested for protesting and resisting arrest equates to ‘terrorism’ and ‘violent thuggery’. Fair enough.

        And you’ve never had a problem with associating with people who’ve done time behind bars, Darrin? How many of those free memberships went to ex-criminals?

      • Also that report does not mention which of the accused are from the Pathetic Party and which are the good guys.

        Given the low quality of the Pathetics and their poor behaviour at previous demos you can be sure there are at least a couple in the mix.

      • Oh dear, is that the best you can come up with. Its not hard to imagine had the boot been on the other foot, that TAB would be yelling it from the roofttops, but since its TAB’s fellow travellers fronting Newtown criminal court there is only silence.

        • P.S:

          “…had the boot been on the other foot, that TAB would be yelling it from the roofttops…”

          Please show us where we ‘yell from the rooftops’ about your ilk fronting court.

      • Terrorists? You call resisting police arrest terrorism, yet you allow members of your own political ‘party’ to publicly support the blowing up of asylum seekers and refugees.

        Figured out why nobody in Australia likes you yet?

  11. ”Racists”, it emerged, were the real minorities in this country: ”about one in 10 Australians have very problematic views on diversity and on ethnic differences. They believe that some races are naturally inferior or superior, and they believe in the need to keep groups separated. These separatists and supremacists are a destructive minority.”

    (Interestingly, those most likely to hold racist attitudes tend to be older, non-tertiary educated, do not speak a language other than English, are Australian-born, and male.)
    The Age
    http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/in-a-tolerant-society-racists-hear-this-your-race-is-run-20110225-1b8hz.html?from=age_sb

    • sounds like the typical profile of a disenfranchised guy who thinks the world owes him something. anyway, 1 in 10 still seems like heaps, even if we are world leaders. i don’t think anyone i know would be in that 10%. oh well.

  12. Well, gee, you know Kenny.
    Media reports about things tend to take a different approach…depending on the day and the angle.

    We’ll, ironically, hear conflicting claims from those pushing “multiculturalism” on Australia as well!

    One day, apparently, all Australians happily welcome their demise, and are keen on their social and racial devestation and elimination.
    The next, Australians are all racists, and aggressive moves have to be made to “change” them!

    It is never ‘racist’ to oppose the invasion of your country.

    One must always take into account the demographic questioned, the circumstances, the timing, and so many other variables, in these all too often contrived and limited “questions” about race, ethnicity, identity, and sovereignty in Australia.

    There’s is all too often an (anti White/anti Western/anti Australian) angle to grind.

    Also, whenever these polls are (rarely) taken…if it’s made apparent that most Australians resent and oppose immigration and ‘multiculturalism’…then that “doesn’t matter”.

    If a very exclusive type of liberal crowd are questioned, who know and care not for the future well being of most Australians…then they are speaking for the majority.

    Ask yourself a serious question Kenny.
    DO YOU sincerely think that the majority of Australians want to see their society given away to the other races and nations of the world?
    Do you really think that the majority of Australians want to insult and spurn their ancestry so much?
    Do you genuinely think that Australians wish to to accept an ever more compromised, marginalised, disposessed, position in their own country…and to finally commit total racial suicide?
    Do you honestly think that most Australians want to lose everything? With not even a peep raised in opposition?

    No, the very mast majority of Australians are extremely hurt and angered by what is being done to them and their country!

    Many, maybe even a majority, of Australians feel forced though to shut up about this, or to pay lip service to accepting “multiculturalism”.

    If you went to ANY of the countries of the people arriving here now they would feel the same about their own society. That is continue to be theirs!

    Let’s break down your list of the attributes of those Australians adhering to ‘racist’ attitudes.
    They’re older?
    So.
    Many Australians are!
    You know, the people who lived in, worked in, and often fought for, their country!
    Are you plying that angle that dictates that Australia will be “better” once the older generation of Australians “dies off”, so there’ll be no-one to question what’s being done?
    I can guarantee the older generations of ANY country on earth would oppose it’s loss!

    They’re “non-tertiary educated”???
    SO?!
    They then have no say in their own country and future?
    Many people standing opposed to mass immigration, racial replacement, and ‘multi-culturalism’ ARE tertiary educated!
    Or else very well educated!

    Tertiary education does not always count for much anymore now though, for over the last 30 to 40 years the left wing doctrines that are destroying society have been promulgated through the tertiary insitutions!
    Tertiary institutions are rife with, are strangled by, neo-communist, liberal, left wing propaganda!

    WHY should anyone in Australia speak any language other than English?
    WE speak English!
    We conduct our societty in English!
    We are British, we are an English speaking nation.
    English is the greatest, most accomplished language on Earth!

    If these other peoples and their languages had made a civilisation comparable to our own then they would NOT want to be running off to our countries!!!!

    Do you also think that other people, in their own countries, who ONLY speak their own language, have now say in their country???

    English is a truly world-wide, highly accomplished, incredibly useful and descriptive, and truly grand, language!

    Unless we choose to, out of interest, Australians do NOT have to speak any other language than English!

    Speaking foreign languages would NOT make the other peoples and cultures suddenly better than us…nor would it mean that they have to come here!

    They’re “Australian born”???
    Yes!
    And?

    That’s what’s called having a country!

    What insanity are you dishing out?

    Yes indeed, Australians born Australians wish to keep our country for ourselves!
    What a surprise!

    You’ll find that a lot of Tibetan born Tibetans resent the Chinese and Mandarin being in their country as well!

    They’re Male?
    AND????

    Isn’t this site supposed to be “anti sexism”???

    Yes, MANY (but NOT ALL) females favour immigration and “multi-culturalism” now…because they’re so arrogant and spare no thought for anything, so pumped full of liberal/leftist/feminist propaganda they are. They do not think about what they ‘support’.

    Many females, many good women, oppose immigration, social fracture, racial dissolution, and “multiculturalism”.

    The Males of ANY country on Earth would defend it!

    Males, MEN, strove, endeavoured, and worked hard to make Australia!
    Australian MEN have every right possible to speak up in defence of their own people, nation, civilisation, and future!

    “Racism”? Yes, that covers a WHOLE lot of issues!
    Our race has proven to have been granted gifts by which we made ourselves superior.
    We have every right to defend and cherish our special, superior, place here.
    It is INSANITY to wish to throw us and our country into a racial quagmire now!

    The races DO need to be largely seperated, for very good reasons!

    “Racism” covers a breadth of issues and angles.
    The malicious moves to destroy White Australia IS RACIST!

    It is NOT racist for us to defend our people and country!

    • Wow, what an essay- that must have flown over my head.

      Even for a racist, you wouldn’t make a good argument- good arguments are short, sharp and straight to the point

      • ahaha scott says “WHY should anyone in Australia speak any language other than English?”

        reminds me of an old joke

        What do you call someone who speaks 3 languages? Multilingual

        What do you call someone who speaks 2 languages? Bilingual

        What do you call someone who speaks 1 language? Australian.

    • ‘Our race has proven to have been granted gifts by which we made ourselves superior.’

      As for this point- here, from all my scientific studies- I have not seen additional gifts that are found in white people. White people do not have a third arm, a third leg, ability to optic blast, draw all metallic objects like a magnet, regenerate, cast lightning storms.

      Rudolf Belka,
      flinger of post-modern faeces

    • Do you really think that the ‘white race’ (because despite your beliefs white and Australian are not interchangable) is superior? What proof do you have for this? You say because we are an advanced country and only white people could have created a society like ours BUT, back in ancient times there were societies (some non-white) who were at a more advanced stage of development than we were at the time. I can also guarantee that in the not too distant future there will be a non-white society that will be more advanced than ours. Things change over history, nothing stays the same.

    • In the midst of all that steaming pile of crapola, Snotty said “We are British, we are an English speaking nation.” Really? You’re British, Scott? Because I always thought that citizens of Australia were, you know, Australians.

  13. Let me tell you one thing Tim.
    The very last thing I’m interested in is entertaining a mug like you!
    You’re probably one of those people who’ll go on about how “boring” Australia was when it was populated mostly by Whites, yes?

    Well, the kind of “excitement” you now want is NOT for you to bring upin Australia.
    If you want an ever more threatened and marginal existence, ears barraged by incomprehensible languages, living hand to mouth, then you go and live in some crowded, dirty, violent third world hellhole!
    Most Australians do no crave being buried in the kind of “excitement” that you’d have wished upon us all.

    I’ve got to bust your bubble Tim, I give so much less than a fuck if I “bore” you.

    Your ‘boredom’ is absolutely not the issue.

    Your friends want to stop Australia being White.
    That makes you, and your friends, racists.
    You can bleet and moan about that not fitting your standard definition of “racist” but that that’s the truth of it.

    None of my friends are stupid.
    People who genuinely practice real racial discrimination are rarely stupid.

    The thing is, I’m not sure if I could call you and your “anti-racist”(?) friends stupid!
    Though what you espouse is rank stupidity, I believe there is far more malicious intent behind it than what could be credited to the merely stupid.

    I can guarantee you, that NO-ONE, friend or foe, has ever thought me boring!

    • “Your friends want to stop Australia being White.”

      No problem with white people living in Australia. Not at all. We just don’t advocate for a whites-only Australia. Not sure how that equates to ‘white-hating’ or ‘racism’ or ‘self-loathing’…

      • … Although I am begining to become an advocate of an Australia free from Scott… Does this make me a ‘Scottist’?

  14. TAB said “No problem with white people living in Australia. Not at all. We just don’t advocate for a whites-only Australia. Not sure how that equates to ‘white-hating’ or ‘racism’ or ‘self-loathing’…”

    Since it used to be an almost-completely white nation (except Aborigines, who were already here), advocating a change does imply a negative opinion of the population “as-it-was-when-it-was-White”.

    Advocating a change from this history implies there is something *wrong* about a nation being composed predominantly of White people.
    It certainly does not imply an indifference to it.

    If you said you had no problem with Black people living in Congo, but don’t see why it should remain that way, you are implying there’s a problem or flaw that needs “fixing”, that the status quo is inherently WRONG.

    This implies a negative assessment of the existing population.
    And a more positive assessment of the “other peoples” who will supposedly “fix” the problem.

    It does not imply neutrality at all.

    • “Since it used to be an almost-completely white nation (except Aborigines, who were already here), advocating a change does imply a negative opinion of the population “as-it-was-when-it-was-White”.”

      No, not when you don’t care about the colour of the skin of the people who live here. Which I don’t. If I’m eating vanilla ice cream, why do I need to reject the rich flavours of chocolate, strawberry and caramel? Am I somehow betraying vanilla by eating other flavours? Am I showing a negative opinion of vanilla by accepting chocolate, strawberry and caramel? Get off the all-anti-racists-are-self-loathing-white-haters train. It’s going nowhere.

      “Advocating a change from this history implies there is something *wrong* about a nation being composed predominantly of White people.”

      No it doesn’t. You’re a perpetual fail whale.

  15. Josh “Given the low quality of the Pathetics and their poor behaviour at previous demos you can be sure there are at least a couple in the mix.”

    And the “Pathetics” wouldn’t even have felt the need to *be there*, if certain Kremlin Komrades haven’t decided it was their RIGHT to deny another’s free speech and vandalise their property.

    If the Kremlin Komrades could just mind their own business for once, the “Pathetics” could stay at home eating lamingtons and knitting a nice sweater.

What do YOU think about this?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s