Your (sic) Talkin (sic) to Sum (sic) One that Reps (sic) the White Power KKK

.

(Inside the mind of a refugee, fleeing a country deep in turmoil for fear of being murdered, tortured or persecuted):

“Hmm.. I really want to take over Australia. I wonder how I’ll do it… A ha! I know! I’ll get on a leaky boat with none of my possessions, and hope that it doesn’t sink on its three week journey to Australia. Then, when I get there, I’ll get thrown into a detention centre for a few years. After I finally get out, I’ll have to build my life from the ground up – with minimal education and no work experience in Australia. Once I’ve got enough money and resources together, (provided I’m still young and enthusiastic, and wanting to take over the country), I’ll walk up to Parliament and demand that they give me the top job. Ah yes… A failsafe plan. Those Aussies won’t know what hit them! Ha!”

 

98 thoughts on “Your (sic) Talkin (sic) to Sum (sic) One that Reps (sic) the White Power KKK

  1. Dude, perhaps you should have some English lessons first before you start posting your heavily opinionated and punctuation lacking remarks!

  2. This guy proudly proclaims on his FB page that he’s “100% aussie” and “hate(s) wogs an i9 love to get drink an fight with any one”. Mmmmm… obviously a very articulate and intelligent individual here. And, like any racist, he appears to have a very poor grasp of the English language.

  3. Isn’t it sad that some of these “dirty boat jumpers” that this twit writes of, can probably speak better English than him. Moreover, their spelling is probably better than his and they probably have a better education than him. (Which wouldn’t be hard in his case!)

    Perhaps for every boat load of refugees arriving in Australia, we can send the boat back on its return journey filled ‘Australians’ like him.

  4. what I find most interesting about people that speak out so loudly about racism, is they really have no idea what they jumping up and down about, it appear the moment you make comment about another culture, it racism… as returned Veteran
    we fought for everybody to have free speech and to express there point of view because it not pleasing to somebody else few point and there culture that has nothing to do with racism its one view point,,, can tell you dont like muslim and some black cultures and will freely speak my mind in regards to those cultures and issue when asked… does that make me racist.. no does not, why because am married to asia lady and have grand children that are islanders
    and like said I fought for the rights of everybody to have free speech regardless of whether I agree with it or not ….

    for those that want to write in about something the young guy from the Gold Coast wrote on his facebook, should first take good look at themself before passing judgement.. this person by the name of caroline that sent off email to his employer.. perhaps should taken the time to contact him, and express her viewpoint and get his reponse beforei what l would call a very cowardly act.

    one does not need to be very brave to stab or hit person from behind.. or to send off a email knowing that there will be no comeback on you… so those that
    are so outspoken about racism should firstly spend sometime living in other countries if they really want to learn the meaning of racism within those countries that then come here and cry racism when we speak about the way they treat there women etc.

      • If you cant work out that he is not the best at english, you must be being racist right now by asking him if he is taking the piss……well, thats how petty this shit is. This is a crock of shit, Bazz is right weather or not he is “taking the piss”. All you bored motherfuckers should go get lives and get on with your own shit instead of worrying about everyone elses. This guy is stating an opinion of his, you are giving this bullshat more attention by doing this for him, therefore you are as bad as he is…… look at the technique of the finest of brush strokes when judging a painting, dont look at the whole picture and judge. And the dick that i replied to, have more respect for people who fought for you to be able to judge everyone around you but yourself.

      • I don’t quite fully understand what bazz is raising? I notice that his English isn’t the best. He has mentioned that he was a soldier(veteran) and has grand children. So it’s not hard to guess his age range & that he wouldn’t have required a great deal of literacy skills to carry out his job.

        Heard “You can’t teach an old dog new tricks”?? I guess that applies to bazz. I personally wouldn’t bother too much & I think what he has mentioned are more prejudice on his part about muslim & some black cultures. My only hope is that he wouldn’t spread his ‘fears’ & ‘prejudice’ to his islander grand children.

        If bazz is real and is as old as he says he is, even marrying an Asian would’ve been a huge deal in his day & age. My only doubt is that if bazz is ‘real’? I have reasonable doubts that he isn’t.

        I don’t quite understand why TAB made that comment either, but what I know is that TAB has information that I don’t have about bazz, like his e-mail address & the IP address he is posting from. So TAB is in a better position to establish if bazz is fake than I am.

        I don’t know what PHV is on about. 😦

    • One also doesn’t have to be very brave to make hate filled comments about asylum seekers (including children) dying in a tragic accident or about masacring asians and muslims at dream world.

      The man in question was contacted over facebook and chose not to respond. His workplace had a right to know that he was not only breaking company policy but that he was doing so in a very public arena. When the company viewed the evidence they decided that the best course of action was to fire him.

      Racism is cowardly, speaking out against it is anything but.

      • I agree entirely with you Caroline, and very well said. Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing, however it does not entitle you to make raciest and bigoted remarks.

      • You do-gooders need to go and get alife, its free speech to say i dislike Muslims or blacks, not a crime and none of your bloody business. Facebook police like you make me sick. Don’t come up to toowoomba anytime soon, we don’t tolerate fuckwits like you up here and you need to open your eyes a bit, the growing tide is turning against multiculturalism, keep australia white and great.

        • Why would anyone want to go to Toowoomba? Everyone is hanging around waiting to screw your mum, and you’re pissed off about being 37th in line for her.

          Bunch of drunken inbreds.

      • Toowoomba Aussie,

        So is it only white people are welcome in Toowoomba?

        I am involved in organising excursions to International Exchange students at Uni & some of these students aren’t white, we have a responsibility to ensure their safety while showing them Australia. I’m personally ashamed to tell them that they can not go to Toowoomba because they aren’t white and that is how Australians treat non-white people. That won’t be a very good message for them to take back to their countries.
        Just want to clarify… appreciate any information.
        Thank You.

    • Do us all a favour and learn some proper spelling and grammar before expressing your opinion. The fact that all those who claim to be such proud Australians are barely able to string a sentence together, frankly, makes me ashamed to be Australian as it makes the entire country look as thick as shit.

    • anything that links a persons race or ethnicity to any particular bahaviour is racism so yes this person is being racist.

      Personally I think Caroline who sent to message to his employer did the right thing and hopefully this young man realises his hateful rantings are hurtful to another human and change it in the future.

    • Yeah, can you imaging it:

      Caroline: ‘Hi Jason, my name is Caroline, I wanted to talk to you about your hateful comments on Facebook, particularly those targeted to ethnic or religious minorities’

      Jason: ‘Fuck off bitch, don’t spout your lefty lies to me .. get back in the kitchen where you belong’

      Click.

      Get a grip Baz.. arseholes like that don’t deserve to have jobs. If you post it on facebook, it’s there for the taking.

  5. Oh look a website dedicated to anti whiteness!
    So much for freedom of speech – its the first casualty when the socialists start to assert themselves. Please go right ahead and mold our every thought to serve your oh so high purpose oh superior ones.

    • Hey! The authors of this website are white and we don’t hate each other! You’ll find that what these people have in common is not necessarily their skin colour, but their hateful comments.

      If you knew anything about Australian law, you’d realise that freedom of speech doesn’t include hate speech.

      Bye bye bogan!

      • Actually, I believe that a fellow in WA was recently imprisoned for posting a hate speech on Youtube. Now, for those people that like to criticise us “socialists” for attacking racists, would you at all tolerate Islamists posting hate speeches online? I certainly wouldn’t, because such speech promotes hate, and I very much doubt that you would either.

      • A restriction on freedom of speech – under the guise of bringing about the cessation of so called “hate speech” is still an afront on the citizens liberty. Hitler was prosecuted 34 times for “crimes” akin to so called “hate speech”. This did not stop him.
        On the contrary the restrictions on speech you and the other socialist losers who support this site endorse are tentative steps down the slippery slope that leads to fascism. Fascist socialist scum clamouring for limits to free speech. Enemies of liberty. Usurpers. We dont bow down to you and your thought control.

        • Hitler still had his job, and a plethora of supporters. What reason did he have for stopping?
          It’s like the guy who owns a $340,000 Ferrari getting a $80 parking fine.

    • what’s anti-whiteness plum? sounds to me something you hallucinate into existence on the basis of the assumption that those who aren’t for you are against you, which is the basic operating principle of anyone seeking to avoid self-criticism.

      you’re such a victim, aren’t you. your problem is that you can’t tell the difference between freedom, or doing what you want as long as you respect the equal rights of others, and license, or doing what you want regardless of the consequences for anyone else. actually you probably can; you just assert license in the name of freedom and accuse anyone who attempts to call you to account for your atrocious behaviour towards people of different ethnicities of being authoritarian.

      if you think about it that’s just projection anyway since your whole belief system is designed to scapegoat the weak for social problems created and perpetuated by the powerful anyway. you’re like a toddler chucking a tantrum because you can’t get your own way, except you’re grown up and you’ve developed a whole system to chuck your tantrum in more ignoble ways. a toddler’s excuse is that they don’t know any better, what’s yours?

      irony is someone who believes in a racial hierarchy accusing others of being high and mighty and superior.

    • When people jump to defend racism by claiming it is discriminating against white people it makes me die inside. You do realize that being racist and being white are two different things? You don’t have to be white to be racist. Though you do have to be stupid to assume that is the case. Please get an education and stop posting inane things that hurt my brain.

  6. If any of these clowns knew anything about the Australia they are so proud of..They would all be aware that Australia was built on ethnic backgrounds..The ones who migrated with nothing but the clothes on their backs..Harbour Bridge..Opera House..Snowy Mountains Project..All built by ethnics..How do i know..My Grandfather ( A German ) was the chief engineer on the SMP..Instead of flapping your useless mouths about nothing,get off your arse and get a job..Your only concerned about your dole payments

  7. To Nathan Stollery,
    I won’t mention all the things everyone else has mentioned (spelling, grammar, lack of intellect etc) as they are blatantly obvious and I really don’t think anyone with any intelligence would bother being offended by anything this moron has to say.
    What I will mention is the one thing that jumped right out at me, and which also perfectly illustrates this moron’s lack of even general knowledge about this country he is supposedly defending. “This is white land”!!! I hate to burst his little bubble of ignorance, but us whites were “boat jumpers”! This country of ours was inhabited by the Aboriginal peoples – who happen to be BLACK!
    I feel he needs a serious lesson in history as well as spelling, grammar, punctuation, human decency, compassion, charity…..I could go on, but I’m sure you get the picture!

  8. Bazz, racism does exist in other countries, but that doesn’t mean we have to accept it here. we shouldn’t lower our standards to someone elses, we should set our owwn standard, that’s why we want to live here.
    take it from someone who was born and raised here yet was called a wog and all the rest, but if i go to where my parents were born, there are also people who lay it on there as well, cause i may look like a local, i don’t sound it.
    it all boils down to ignorance and thinking that everyone from a certain place are all the same, fact is, we’re not

  9. To put it simply, I am of the view that we are all the same species, black, white, pink, olive or whatever skin you have. Where you are from is not important, it’s who you are that counts. As far as I’m concerned, anyone who attacks another based on Race, Birthplace, Religious views or any other category that has not come to mind is enforcing some form of racism. We are one people. To quote John F. Kennedy’s speech at the end of the Cuban Missile Crisis “… We all breathe the same air and we are all mortal”. We are One.

    Before people go calling me a socialist or whatever, I am a free enterprising individual living in Perth, WA who believes that we are one, I don’t care what you look like, what your customs are, religious beliefs or whatever so long as you can do the job. This has made me successful and has made me a lot of friends in the neighbourhood and often the ‘of choice’ shop for the area despite the very varied demographic.

    • How dare you misuse free speech to speak your mind.
      Tut Tut Tut. A “real” defender of free speech would not like your peaceful and tolerant views. If every one thought as you do we might just get along with one another better and create world with less hatred and we cannot have that. How on earth will the scumbags of the world be able to use race and religion to make money and grab power?

  10. Nathan is an 18 year old that has a profile as “100% aussie i hate wogs an i9 love to get drink an fight with any one”. The parents have a lot to answer for…..

  11. Plum.
    How exactly is speaking out against racism hindering anybodies freedom of speech? I dont read anything on this site about being for or against “anti-whiteness” (whatever that is).
    Defensive much?

  12. Bazz. If you are proud to have fought hard for free speech then you wont mind also if someone also uses that free speech to speak out against racism or predjudice.

  13. This guy Nathan says to “fuck the black man”. Haha, I’d rather have a black guy instead of a bogan any day! Looks like poor little Nathan isn’t gonna get laid anymore. LMAO!

    • hahaha this site is fun! with a name like willy b you probs are a black man! ooppss jks does that mean I’m not racist cause I don’t always remember to say jks just love a good laugh most aussies do

      • but just because you say jks doesnt make something funny. You are right a lot of aussies do like a laugh but mostly just at funny stuff. A black man called willy b. Wow hilarious…..

  14. Hey everyone just thought I’d say a lil somethin and yeah I don’t wanna spell correctly my choice not because i can’t just couldn’t be bothered on a site like this,
    1 everyone is racist
    2 I’m proud to be an aussie we’ll as aussie as ya can get without being an abbo
    3 if a culture is sterotyped its because they or the majority act that way it’s not right but it’s human nature
    4 the media is 99% lies so don’t believe TV
    5 this site is really quite pointless pointing the finger at others and dedicating a whole site and a lot of time focusing on racism is a waste get on with your life and live not everyone in the world is going to like you thats a fact, but if your a good person a lot of ppl will despite of colour of skin. a lot of ppl you call racist have had experiences that make them think that way just like a lot of ppl have felt judged by others because of where they are from.

  15. All the different waves of immigrants have suffered this kind of racism. Italians, Greeks, Asians etc..
    It will pass when the next disaffected people come along.
    However, moderate Muslims could help themselves by speaking up against militant Islamists crying jihad.
    The problem is that alot of Sharia law is not legal in the western world. However, Sharia law was not conceived from the Koran. It doesn’t have to be part of Islam.
    They shouldn’t have Sheik weird Al Halay in Lakemba as their spokesperson as he distances Muslims from the rest of the community.
    We, in turn, should not glorify alcohol and the ‘my dick is sooo huge’ culture.
    We should tell the pricks making money from our alcohol consumption to get stuffed & say bugger your old man swill, we want marijuana & ecstasy legalised & regulated.
    We will be much happier & will have less hatred that can be fuelled by the piss …

    • Are you aware of the various Muslim groups inhabited by the thousands that exist in this country that distance themselves from Islamic extremists and fundamentalists? That oppose religious dictatorship?

  16. Racism is an attitude that destroys people`s lives either through actions or words . Freedom of speech also exists with limits . Like in science every action will get an equal reaction , or you reap what you sow.

    We live in a sensitive society and we more connected than ever . Big brother is watching your every move. Boys will be boys . The thing i find difficult is that kids these days are not diciplined enough like the old days , a little respect for yourself and others goes a long way . Bad habits start at a early age so it was up to our folks to set boundaries in place . If you never had this upbringing so how can you be a responsable adult . Everyone deserves a second chance . Losing your job is no joke. At the end of the day , think before you open your mouth after all your family`s depending on your salary.

    These comments are not for or against people`s believe`s but common sense is lacking in many individuals . Let`s lighten up folks , we all live under the same flag . Viva Australia.

  17. It is nice that people fought for freedom of speech – guess what this is Australia and freedom of speech is not part of our constitution. Americans have a right to freedom of speech enshrined in their constitution Australians do not. To make judgement on any group because of place of birth, skin colour etc is discriminatory and bigoted. It may not be racism (Islam is a religion not a race) but it is ignorant. All Aussies are lazy dole bludgers…..a commonly held belief does not become fact.

    “this is my land” – goodness he must be a very wealthy individual to own all of Australia under white man’s law. The original inhabitants of this land were possibly dinosaurs but I was not around to actually know if this was true. The oldest human population of Australia that we are aware of is the indigenous Australians who just happen to be dark skinned and even they are meant to have walked across from Asia. The Dutch were supposedly the first “boat people” here but they weren’t interested in staying. The bloody “boat people” that wanted to take the country over (Captain Cook and his countrymen) did rob the Australians (indigenous).

    There is a part of Nathan’s rant I agree with though and that is that robbing people is wrong and nobody should do it. Work hard, earn a living and respect others. It would be nice if it were that simple but at least we should strive to act in this way. I might not like what you say but I will defend your right to say it – even if you are wrong and a whole lot of people need to point out how foolish you are (after all they have the right to say what they want to as well).

  18. I’d like it to be known that some of these boat people do assault and rape women of this country. I’d also like it to be know that they do not rebuild themselves from the ground up in this country, they receive handouts, entitlement, housing and education at the governments expense after being processed through immigration.

    • Can you also let it be known what % of these ‘boat people’ assault and rape women of this country please?

      I’d like it to be known that people who were born here also assault and rape women of this country.

    • Like who? Could you please provide examples?
      Even if it were the case (immigrants assaulting or raping), caucasian Australians who were born here ALSO assault and rape… oh, and go on Centrelink benefits too. What is your point?

  19. Racists love their ‘freedom of speech’, don’t they? Well guess what? We do not have a ‘freedom of speech’ right in this country. Stop watching so much fucking American television and crack a book open sometime you ill-educated c**ts. In Australia we have a thing called an ‘implied freedom of political communication’. If you are so proud of your country, learn the laws of it. Racism is not political communication, it is the ill-conceived ramblings of a fuckwit. What you are doing is not only unlawful, but it is just plain stupid.

    Also, learn to fucking read and write sometime.

  20. …that discriminate directly against the core White population!
    Who’s legal and social system actually rules here, because we brought civilisation here.
    Otherwise there is no society for others to want into, or for brats like yourself to want to give to them.
    A legal system, which is now often being retro-engineered to discriminate against the very people who’s system and society it is!

    When we, as a people and a nation, enshrined our White Australia Policy, we very wisely and healthily used our discriminating mind to protect ourselves.

    That’s what made the great nation, that others want, and that you want to give away…ironically.

    It’s tragic what’s being done to it and us now.

    We still can though, practice such healthy discrimination again.

    “We” don’t have anti-discrimination laws. We have our tried and true British law.
    Malicious power elites and interest groups have contrived “anti-discrimination” laws…so as to silence the foundational White population.

  21. @TAB, yes the majority of Muslims in Australia are moderate.
    I’m not anti-Muslim, however, the Muslim community could help their integration by denouncing some militant groups that are destructive to their people. Not bowing down to the Aussie flag instead of Allah but acknowledgment of the cloud that hangs over their heads.
    Most Muslims in Australia are english speaking & have arrived originally by plane (if they weren’t born here), so this is possible.
    I’m not against the Muslim community, I just see somethings that could be altered to help stop simpleton media like ‘Today Tonight’ feeding some bogan bullsh*t to people like this moron ….

    • I think the Muslims certainly need to take active ownership of their own community and not to hand it over to the garbage media, but neither should the community accept that the garbage media standards are to be taken seriously. I am not sure how one does that without imposing legislation, which of course is not desirable.

      Maybe some of the more serious media outlets should be featuring more Muslim op-ed writers, or current affairs presenters.

      I don’t think that extremist organisations have a great presence or influence in the Muslim community any more than neo-Nazis do in the community as a whole. However the growth of one will no doubt fuel the growth of the other, and both have criminal elements and associations which need to be closely scrutinised.

    • Today Tonight couldn’t care less if 99% of Australia’s Muslim community worked as volunteers for the SES. If one douchetard Sheikh or Imam speaks up about Australians being cursed to an eternity in hell for wearing bikinis, they’ll be all over that story in a flash.

  22. I have read all your comments. And in “my opinion” I agree and also disagree with some comments. I believe focusing on things like grammar/spelling, education/intellect or whatever else, are all not the point. I believe this site was set up to highlight racism in Australia.
    Yes it exists in Australia and I don’t believe it is right (the world is not fair or just all the time), but I also believe reporting one guy who doesn’t appreciate that Australia “in general” believes in multiculturalism is quite right, because there are plenty more out there (Caroline. are you the racism police, if so you have a lot of work to do) I also believe that soldiers who fought for and died for the flag give us this opportunity to speak our mind. While this fellow did it in the wrong place and time there is little anyone can do to stop hateful remarks coming from people’s minds and out their mouths.
    Don’t concern yourself too much with everyone else but don’t let people you know get away with talking badly about subjects that you deem inappropriate tell them it’s hurtful and why you find it hurtful, rather than calling someone a racist, this will do little to change their ways . I’m sure his opinion has changed little he just now knows not to voice it.
    Now I stumbled across this from ninemsn and was reluctant to the point I was almost not going to comment and dismiss all of your comments as “just people’s opinions” as this is just mine, but felt compelled (as Caroline must have) to remind everybody that you are your own person, you are entitled to your own opinion (but be wise enough to know when to voice it) and don’t worry about what someone else you don’t know thinks about certain subjects, if you’re smart enough to concern yourself with “someone from facebook’s opinion” then be smarter than them and realize they would probably have lost their job anyway with their attitude or at the least everyone they work with doesn’t think much of them anyway.
    At the end on the day what this guy said was not acceptable and he has paid the price for speaking in a public domain such as face book.

  23. TAB: “The authors of this website are white and we don’t hate each other!”

    Once you’re in the Borg you don’t count as White.

    ites : “your problem is that you can’t tell the difference between freedom, or doing what you want as long as you respect the equal rights of others”

    Whose rights have been taken away by this man’s comments?

    “you’re like a toddler chucking a tantrum because you can’t get your own way”

    Look who’s talking!
    Someone said a nasty word on Facebook, WAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!

    Pumpkin: “When people jump to defend racism by claiming it is discriminating against white people it makes me die inside.”

    Rest in peace.

    Box: “Harbour Bridge..Opera House..Snowy Mountains Project..All built by ethnics.”

    Oh, is that when “Australia” started?

    Hello?: “This country of ours was inhabited by the Aboriginal peoples – who happen to be BLACK!”

    Was. Past tense.
    “Our land” now.

    Michael: “To put it simply, I am of the view that we are all the same species, black, white, pink, olive or whatever skin you have.”

    Species, yes.
    Ethnicity, no.
    Civilisation, no.
    History, no.

    John Citizen: “I dont read anything on this site about being for or against “anti-whiteness” (whatever that is).”

    That’s because unlike Nathan Stollery, TAB won’t *admit they’re racist.

    WhiteAussieGal: “It is nice that people fought for freedom of speech – guess what this is Australia and freedom of speech is not part of our constitution.”

    And a “right to eat Cornflakes” isn’t either.
    Natural and Common law rights are *not required to be written in official legislation.

    Brooke: “In Australia we have a thing called an ‘implied freedom of political communication’.”

    So our right to “communicate” is restricted to “political” comments, eh?

    • Um, surely freedom of speech means that if Nathan Stollery has a right to be able to make his vile racist comments than surely people have a right to point out that he’s making vile racist comments?

    • Ah yep, that’s what I wrote. What a good little doggy you are, reading A WHOLE COMMENT all by yourself. Here, have little doggy treat.

      Cockhead.

      The shit you are spurting is not protected by legislation, so stop acting like you have some mythical ‘right’ to be a cockhead, because you don’t.

  24. Hello?: “This country of ours was inhabited by the Aboriginal peoples – who happen to be BLACK!”

    Was. Past tense.
    “Our land” now.

    lol you’d think someone such as yourself who is anti-immigration would have some sympathy for what happened to the aboriginals. hypocrite much?

  25. HURRDURR said “lol you’d think someone such as yourself who is anti-immigration would have some sympathy for what happened to the aboriginals.”

    I do.
    Which is why I don’t want to see my own people sniffing glue in a slum in 200 years time.

    You are the “’hypocrites, much”.
    Every ethnic group BUT White ones are entitled to their territories, cultures, racial gene pool.

    You guys wouldn’t dare say the things you say to White Australians to Tibetans or Eskimos or African pygmies.
    Would tell them “Cry me a river. Suck it up. Poor baby.”?

    • lol if you really cared about the aborginals you’d not be on here spewing your shit, hence, ‘hypocrite much?’.

      have a cry shocky, australia’s situation is in no way comparable to tibetans etc. so much butthurt, get a reality check.

      also, ‘neckbeard internet armchair warrior’ is more fitting for you.

      U MAD BRO?

  26. Shockadelic said: “Which is why I don’t want to see my own people sniffing glue in a slum in 200 years time.”

    Pretty sure this has always been a bogan pasttime.

  27. Wow. I can’t believe I only just discovered this page. I love it. About time someone shamed this dumbarse racist bogans, they make all Australians look bad.
    Count me in!

  28. Brooke: “Ah yep, that’s what I wrote.”

    And you’re wrong.
    Our “implied” right to speak is not restricted to “political communication”.

    “The shit you are spurting is not protected by legislation”

    Please quote the “shit spurted” VERBATIM that was illegal.
    Cockhead.

  29. Mat said “Um, surely freedom of speech means that if Nathan Stollery has a right to be able to make his vile racist comments than surely people have a right to point out that he’s making vile racist comments?”

    Yes.
    But fine him for it?
    Cancel his account or Facebook group?
    Gaol him?
    Send the comments to his employer, who then fires him?
    (as recently happened with Name Removed)

    Making speech a *crime* or an excuse for unethical treatment of people because of their opinions is an Orwellian downward spiral.

    *Where* do we draw the line?
    Name Removed’s JOKES were considered the same as a SERIOUS statement.
    Is that reasonable?

    Who are these Almighty Enlightened Ones who will magically decide which “words/opinions” are permissible and which aren’t.

    There are no such Almighty Enlightened Ones.
    And there never will be.

    Which is precisely why the concept of free speech appeared in the first place.

    • easy if the words dicriminate then they come under discrimination lawsz
      the ‘Almighty Enlightened Ones’ are our independent judicary, as well it should be.
      and discrimination is not covered by freedom of speech. so fuck you dickwad

  30. AAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHH………

    This is me yawning at you Shockadelic.

    Fuck you are boring.

    Okay – let’s me respond in kind then:

    Why does Princess Shock A Delic attack my character? Anger? Fear? Stupidity? Some deep inaniloquent urging of her soul? The answer cannot easily be found, but the sun has never shone on a more choleric and destructive person than Shock A Delic. In the rest of this letter, I will use history and science (in the Hegelian sense) to prove that I myself am morally and ethically opposed to her wheelings and dealings. I once told her that her monographs are colored by a sycophantic adoration of opportunism. How did she respond to that? She proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that Princess Delic will just moan and groan until we give her permission to manipulate everything and everybody. Of that I am certain because I’m not writing this letter for your entertainment. I’m not even writing it for your education. I’m writing it for our very survival.

    If you were to tell Princess Delic that her avowal that there should be publicly financed centers of jujuism is all cant and hogwash, she’d just pull her security blanket a little tighter around herself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. What’s interesting is that we must soon make one of the most momentous decisions in history. We must decide whether to let Princess Delic open the gates of Hell or, alternatively, whether we should complain about malignant euphuists. Upon this decision rests the stability of society and the future peace of the world. My view on this decision is that Princess Delic’s spokesmen believe that men are spare parts in the social repertoire—mere optional extras. Although it is perhaps impossible to change the perspective of those who have such beliefs, I wish nevertheless to give Princess Delic a rhadamanthine warning not to make my blood curdle.

    Princess Delic’s subhuman, footling plans for the future often resemble an inverted fairy tale in that the triumph of innocence comes at the start and the ugly sisters of parasitism and radicalism enter on stage in triumph for the final curtain. Although Princess Delic likes to pontificate about how truth is merely a social construct, the truth is that for her neo-neurotic plans to succeed, Princess Delic needs to dumb down our society. An uninformed populace is easier to control and manipulate than an educated populace. As soon as our backs are turned, schoolchildren will stop being required to learn the meanings of words like “ultramicrochemistry” and “roentgenographic”. They will be incapable of comprehending that I, for one, find that some of Princess Delic’s choices of words in her apologues would not have been mine. For example, I would have substituted “sex-crazed” for “anthropomorphization” and “primitive” for “labyrinthibranchiate.”

    In whatever form it takes—magazines, music, propaganda, or any other form—Princess Delic’s rhetoric is designed to pilfer the national treasure. I’m sure Princess Delic wouldn’t want me to eavesdrop on her secret conversations. So why does she want to consign most of us to the role of her servants or slaves? I don’t pretend to know the answer, but I do know that she would not hesitate to threaten the existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet, if she felt she could benefit from doing so. It is not uncommon for her to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole smarmy affair as some great benefit to humanity. Even so, I must admit that I’ve read only a small fraction of Princess Delic’s writings. (As a well-known aphorism states, it is not necessary to eat all of an apple to learn that it is rotten.) Nevertheless, I’ve read enough of Princess Delic’s writings to know that Princess Delic claims that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. Well, I beg to differ.

    Princess Delic has been known to lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality. That always spurs on her factotums to waste hours and hours of our time in fruitless conferences and meetings. That, in turn, encourages Princess Delic to disparage and ridicule our traditional heroes and role models. This cycle inevitably, inexorably ratchets upwards and outwards until at last some callous euphuist winds up substituting pap for art. It is quite true, of course, that I want to speak in the strongest possible terms against her excuses. But she says that she is a spokeswoman for God. Yet she also wants to pursue a twofold credo of antiheroism and isolationism. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because there’s something I’ve observed about her. Namely, she may not know how to spell “teleoroentgenography”, but she obviously knows how to rob, steal, cheat, and murder. I’ve further observed that I must indisputably add my voice to the chorus of those who reveal the truth about Princess Delic’s antics. But I digress. Princess Delic says she’s going to engulf reason and humanity within waves of fascism and fear before long. Is she out of her intransigent mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that by her standards, if you have morals, believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children—let alone teach them to be morally fit—you’re definitely an infantile talebearer. My standards—and I suspect yours as well—are quite different from Princess Delic’s. For instance, I undeniably believe that she once had the audacity to tell me that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point. My riposte was that she has been trying to convince us that courtesy and manners don’t count for anything. That argument fails to take into account the reality that Princess Delic’s fusillades are becoming increasingly patronizing. They have already begun to traffic in our blood, our birthright, and our security. Now fast-forward a few years to a time in which they have enabled Princess Delic to influence the attitudes of dominant culture towards any environment or activity that is predominantly untoward. If you don’t want such a time to come then help me draw a picture of what we conceive of under the word “phototelegraphically”. Help me disentangle people from the snares set by Princess Delic and her assistants.

    Like a lion after tasting the blood of human victims, Princess Delic will deploy enormous resources in a war of attrition against helpless citizens. From secret-handshake societies meeting at “the usual place” to back-door admissions committees, her habitués have always found a way to redefine success and obscure failure. She keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that priggism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us. The purpose of this deception may be to label everyone she doesn’t like as a racist, sexist, fascist, communist, or some equally terrible “-ist”. Or maybe the purpose is to fleece us. Oh what a tangled web Princess Delic weaves when first she practices to deceive.

    Ever since Princess Delic decided to place insane, misinformed treasonous-types at the top of the social hierarchy, her consistent, unvarying line has been that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. Her underlings tend to fall into the mistaken belief that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues, mainly because they live inside a Princess Delic-generated illusion world and talk only with each other. She has delivered exactly the opposite of what she had previously promised us. Most notably, Princess Delic’s vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and domination. And, almost as troubling, her vows of equality did little more than convince people that she has never disproved anything I’ve ever written. Princess Delic does, however, often try to discredit me by means of flagrant misquotations, by attributing to me views that I’ve never expressed. In the end, her biases are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, “bunk”—an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well—because she claims that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors. I think that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that seeing Princess Delic succeed at creating a desolation and calling it peace has left me with a number of unanswered questions—questions such as “How can we break her hypnotic spell over bloody-minded showboaters?”

    Princess Delic’s cohorts all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way she keeps them loyal to her is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. I wonder what would happen if Princess Delic really did start wars, ruin the environment, invent diseases, and routinely do a hundred other things that kill people. There’s a spooky thought.

    While Princess Delic and other sanguinary couch potatoes sometimes differ on the details and scale of their upcoming campaigns of terror they never fail to agree on the basic principle and substance. Hence, it is imperative that you understand that on the issue of propagandism, she is wrong again. Sure, this is partly connected with what I wrote earlier concerning ignominious prima donnas. But all she really wants is to hang onto the perks she’s getting from the system. That’s all she really cares about. It’s precisely because Princess Delic’s agendas are a lascivious, wicked carnival of serfism that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, clearly assert that there are in fact many people who possess the intelligence, wisdom, talent, and ability to transform our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence. My goal is to locate those people and encourage them to help me halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction.

    When surveyed, only two percent of Princess Delic’s followers agreed with the statement, “It would be a semantic quibble to deny that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, find Princess Delic’s ruinous policies and dubious values unacceptable.” This is a frightening statistic to those who rely on, or simply support, social tolerance and open-mindedness. Just because I understand Princess Delic’s calumnies doesn’t mean I agree with them. A great many of us don’t want Princess Delic to understate the negative impact of exclusivism. Still, we feel a prodigious societal pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to her shambolic, repulsive prophecies. She just reported that society is supposed to be lenient towards snarky, prurient politicos. Do you think that that’s merely sloppy reporting on Princess Delic’s part? I don’t. I think that it’s a deliberate attempt to reduce social and cultural awareness to a dictated set of guidelines to follow. Let me close by remarking that if I have succeeded, as I hope and believe I have, in presenting such a combination of facts and arguments as has demonstrated the propriety of insisting on a policy of zero tolerance toward wowserism, I shall regard it as evidence complete that these lines have been judiciously penned.

  31. Terror AUSTRALIS! said “AAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHH………”

    Not as much fun, this time.
    But here’s the edited highlights for all you comedy fans.

    “Why does Princess Shock A Delic attack my character? Some deep inaniloquent urging of her soul? the sun has never shone on a more choleric and destructive person. ”

    “her monographs are colored by a sycophantic adoration of opportunism”

    “her avowal that there should be publicly financed centers of jujuism is all cant and hogwash”

    “we must soon make one of the most momentous decisions in history. We must decide whether to let Princess Delic open the gates of Hell or, alternatively, whether we should complain about malignant euphuists.”

    “I wish nevertheless to give Princess Delic a rhadamanthine warning not to make my blood curdle.”

    “Princess Delic’s subhuman, footling plans for the future often resemble an inverted fairy tale in that the triumph of innocence comes at the start and the ugly sisters of parasitism and radicalism enter on stage in triumph for the final curtain.’

    “As soon as our backs are turned, schoolchildren will stop being required to learn the meanings of words like “ultramicrochemistry” and “roentgenographic”. ”

    “I would have substituted “sex-crazed” for “anthropomorphization” and “primitive” for “labyrinthibranchiate.””

    “why does she want to consign most of us to the role of her servants or slaves? I don’t pretend to know the answer, but I do know that she would not hesitate to threaten the existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet, if she felt she could benefit from doing so.”

    “Princess Delic has been known to lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality. That always spurs on her factotums”

    “This cycle inevitably, inexorably ratchets upwards and outwards until at last some callous euphuist winds up substituting pap for art.”

    “she says that she is a spokeswoman for God. Yet she also wants to pursue a twofold credo of antiheroism and isolationism. Am I the only one who sees the irony there?”

    “she may not know how to spell “teleoroentgenography”, but she obviously knows how to rob, steal, cheat, and murder.”

    “Is she out of her intransigent mind?”

    “you’re definitely an infantile talebearer.”

    “Princess Delic’s fusillades are becoming increasingly patronizing. They have already begun to traffic in our blood, our birthright, and our security.
    Now fast-forward a few years to a time in which they have enabled Princess Delic to influence the attitudes of dominant culture towards any environment or activity that is predominantly untoward. If you don’t want such a time to come then help me draw a picture of what we conceive of under the word “phototelegraphically”.”

    “Oh what a tangled web Princess Delic weaves when first she practices to deceive.”

    “Princess Delic’s vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and domination. And, almost as troubling, her vows of equality did little more than convince people that she has never disproved anything I’ve ever written.” [non sequitur par excellence]

    “she claims that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors. I think that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves”

    “How can we break her hypnotic spell over bloody-minded showboaters?”

    “I wonder what would happen if Princess Delic really did start wars, ruin the environment, invent diseases, and routinely do a hundred other things that kill people. There’s a spooky thought.”

    “While Princess Delic and other sanguinary couch potatoes sometimes differ on the details and scale of their upcoming campaigns of terror”

    “this is partly connected with what I wrote earlier concerning ignominious prima donnas.”

    “It’s precisely because Princess Delic’s agendas are a lascivious, wicked carnival of serfism that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, clearly assert that there are in fact many people who possess the intelligence, wisdom, talent, and ability to transform our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence. My goal is to locate those people and encourage them to help me halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction. ” [that would be me, apparently]

    “When surveyed, only two percent of Princess Delic’s followers agreed with the statement, “It would be a semantic quibble to deny that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, find Princess Delic’s ruinous policies and dubious values unacceptable.” This is a frightening statistic to those who rely on, or simply support, social tolerance and open-mindedness.” [or reality]

    “Still, we feel a prodigious societal pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to her shambolic, repulsive prophecies.”

    “She just reported that society is supposed to be lenient towards snarky, prurient politicos.”

    “I’m not writing this letter for your entertainment. I’m not even writing it for your education. I’m writing it for our very survival.”

  32. Oh so you wanna keep playing then.

    Please oh please keep reading and regurgitating me back to me:

    This has three main sections. In the first, I argue that Chairwoman Crock Of Shockadelic’s ballyhoos are shrouded in a fog of authoritarianism. In the second, I make it clear that we must stick to our guns and not let Chairwoman Shockadelic convince us that the government (and perhaps she herself) should have sweeping powers to arrest and hold people indefinitely on flimsy grounds. And in the third and final section, I conclude that she has a one-track mind. The following text regards my complaints of recent days against her and her subtle but empty-headed attempts to encourage and exacerbate passivity in some people who might otherwise be active and responsible citizens.

    In hearing about Chairwoman Shockadelic’s views, one gets the distinct impression that Chairwoman Shockadelic dreams of a time when she’ll be free to silence anyone whom she considers sniveling. That’s the way she’s planned it, and that’s the way it’ll happen—not may happen but will happen—if we don’t interfere, if we don’t tend to the casualties of her war on sanity. I defy the lascivious slumlords who paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures, and I defy the powers of darkness that they represent. Unbalanced trollops are sharply focused on an immediate goal: to prostrate the honor, power, independence, laws, and property of entire countries. If we let Chairwoman Shockadelic sow the seeds of obscurantism we’ll be reaping the crop for quite a long time. For heaven’s sake, she has arrived at the highest degree of imposture. I mean, think about it.

    We need to compare, contrast, and identify the connections among different types of sinful animalism. Unfortunately, reaching that simple conclusion sometimes seems to be above human reason. But there is a wisdom above human, and to that we must look if we are ever to free people from the fetters of negativism’s poisonous embrace. It has been proven time and time again that if Chairwoman Shockadelic were to consign most of us to the role of her servants or slaves, social upheaval and violence would follow. It is therefore clear that Chairwoman Shockadelic sometimes has trouble convincing people that if she kicks us in the teeth we’ll then lick her toes and beg for another kick. When she has such trouble, she usually trots out a few biased psychics to constate authoritatively that ebola, AIDS, mad-cow disease, and the hantavirus were intentionally bioengineered by amoral tricksters for the purpose of population reduction. Whether or not that trick of hers works, it’s still the case that Chairwoman Shockadelic is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don’t seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in her own biases, gets into all sorts of wishy-washy speculation, and then makes no effort to test out her speculations—and that’s just the short list! There are those who are informed and educated about the evils of emotionalism, and there are those who are not. Chairwoman Shockadelic is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that’s why if I had my druthers, she would never have had the opportunity to inculcate the hermeneutics of suspicion in otherwise open-minded people. As it stands, Chairwoman Shockadelic has—not once, but several times—been able to increase society’s cycle of hostility and violence without anyone stopping her. How long can that go on? As long as her self-absorbed, satanic allegations are kept on life support. That’s why we have to pull the plug on them and guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by Chairwoman Shockadelic and her gang.

    Chairwoman Shockadelic’s diatribes are not our only concern. To state the matter in a few words, if you’ve read this far then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me. It would stand to reason that if Chairwoman Shockadelic’s prevarications get any more disdainful, I expect they’ll grow legs and attack me in my sleep. The baneful nature of Chairwoman Shockadelic’s ideals is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify. If Chairwoman Shockadelic succeeds in her attempt to threaten our core values, allegiances, and beliefs, it’ll have to be over my dead body.

    As our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the kinds of people Chairwoman Shockadelic preys upon. She exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that’s really just a defense mechanism to cover up her obvious inferiority. Chairwoman Shockadelic has spent untold hours trying to offer hatred with an intellectual gloss. During that time, did it ever once occur to her that her sentiments are out of step with democratic practices of equity and fair play? We should be able to look into our own souls for the answer. If we do, I suspect we’ll find that her cold, analytical approach to cynicism doesn’t take into account the human element. In particular, those who have been hurt by cynicism know that Chairwoman Shockadelic has already begun denying us the opportunity to set the stage so that my next letter will begin from a new and much higher level of influence. I wish I were joking, but I’m not. What’s more, Chairwoman Shockadelic is just trying to pick a fight. That’s why she says that granting her complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air.

    Behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when Chairwoman Shockadelic denies ever having strived to jump on everything that is written, said, or even implied and label it as either lazy or imperious. She plans to spread hatred, animosity, and divisiveness. What can you do about that? Start by reading about how Chairwoman Shockadelic confuses demagoguery with leadership and undocumented conspiracism with serious research. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propaganda surrounding her promotion of officialism. Tell everyone you know that besotted stool pigeons tend to dismiss reason, science, and objective reality. This is not what I think; this is what I know. I additionally know that that fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. “Thinking” is the key word in the previous sentence.

    What Chairwoman Shockadelic apparently fails to realize is that in her objectives, larrikinism is witting and unremitting, craven and snooty. She revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to create massive civil unrest. If she hadn’t been condemning children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, rape, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors, it simply would not have occurred to me to write the letter you now are reading. Why, I might have taken the day off altogether. Or maybe I would have been out drawing a picture of what we conceive of under the word “superphlogistication”. In any case, you don’t have to say anything specifically about Chairwoman Shockadelic for her to start attacking you. All you have to do is dare to imply that we should wage war on vigilantism.

    I should note that Chairwoman Shockadelic uses hooliganism to retain an institution which, twist and turn as you like, is and remains a disgrace to humanity. That’s the large elephant in the room that nobody ever talks about. Nevertheless, I undoubtedly feel that people really ought to start talking about it because then they’d realize that Chairwoman Shockadelic has been violating the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. If there were any semblance of decency left in her entourage that ought to be an affront to it. Sadly, that’s a big “if”; we all know that when Chairwoman Shockadelic was first found creating an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of colonialism, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Chairwoman Shockadelic is planning to put increased disruptive powers in the hands of what I call bad-tempered clowns, I’m surely terrified.

    I’ll talk about that another time. I have other, more important, things to discuss now. For starters, Chairwoman Shockadelic must have recently made a huge withdrawal from the First National Bank of Lies. How else could she manage to tell us that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points? I am cognizant that her arguments don’t even prove her point, but if you look back over some of my older letters, you’ll see that I predicted that she would keep us perennially behind the eight ball. And, as I predicted, she did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about Chairwoman Shockadelic could have made the same prediction.

    Even Chairwoman Shockadelic’s shills couldn’t deal with the full impact of Chairwoman Shockadelic’s press releases. That’s why they created “Chairwoman Shockadelic-ism,” which is just an intolerant excuse to feed us a diet of robbery, murder, violence, and all other manner of trials and tribulations. She wants me to stop trying to act as a positive role model for younger people. Instead, she’d rather I crawl under a rock and die. Sorry, but I don’t accept defeat that easily. I would like to go on, but I do have to keep this letter short. So I’ll wrap it up by saying that the extent of collaboration between Chairwoman Crock Of Shockadelic and warped perverts is unknown but presumably significant.

  33. Terror AUSTRALIS!!! said “Oh so you wanna keep playing then.”

    Please!
    This is so much fun!

    “Please oh please keep reading and regurgitating me back to me:”

    I edit for the benefit of the more sensible among us.

    “This has three main sections.”

    Okay. Let’s go.

    “In the first, I argue that Chairwoman Crock Of Shockadelic’s ballyhoos are shrouded in a fog of authoritarianism. In the second, I make it clear that we must stick to our guns and not let Chairwoman Shockadelic convince us that the government (and perhaps she herself) should have sweeping powers to arrest and hold people indefinitely on flimsy grounds. And in the third and final section, I conclude that she has a one-track mind.”

    Yours is off the tracks.

    “if we don’t tend to the casualties of her war on sanity.”

    “I defy the lascivious slumlords who paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures, and I defy the powers of darkness that they represent.”

    “Unbalanced trollops”

    “sow the seeds of obscurantism”

    “For heaven’s sake, she has arrived at the highest degree of imposture. I mean, think about it.”

    “sinful animalism.”

    “the fetters of negativism’s poisonous embrace.”

    “sometimes has trouble convincing people that if she kicks us in the teeth we’ll then lick her toes and beg for another kick.”

    “she usually trots out a few biased psychics to constate authoritatively that ebola, AIDS, mad-cow disease, and the hantavirus were intentionally bioengineered by amoral tricksters”

    “I had my druthers, she would never have had the opportunity to inculcate the hermeneutics of suspicion”

    “As it stands, Chairwoman Shockadelic has—not once, but several times—been able to increase society’s cycle of hostility and violence without anyone stopping her. How long can that go on?”

    “her self-absorbed, satanic allegations are kept on life support.’

    “if you’ve read this far then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me.” [or ROFL]

    “if Chairwoman Shockadelic’s prevarications get any more disdainful, I expect they’ll grow legs and attack me in my sleep.”

    “my next letter will begin from a new and much higher level of influence. I wish I were joking, but I’m not.”

    “she says that granting her complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air.”

    “confuses demagoguery with leadership and undocumented conspiracism with serious research.”

    “Tell everyone you know that besotted stool pigeons tend to dismiss reason, science, and objective reality. This is not what I think; this is what I know. I additionally know that that fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. “Thinking” is the key word in the previous sentence.”

    “in her objectives, larrikinism is witting and unremitting, craven and snooty. She revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to create massive civil unrest. If she hadn’t been condemning children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, rape, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors, it simply would not have occurred to me to write the letter you now are reading. Why, I might have taken the day off altogether. Or maybe I would have been out drawing a picture of what we conceive of under the word “superphlogistication”.”

    “when Chairwoman Shockadelic was first found creating an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of colonialism, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Chairwoman Shockadelic is planning to put increased disruptive powers in the hands of what I call bad-tempered clowns, I’m surely terrified.
    I’ll talk about that another time. I have other, more important, things to discuss now.”
    [more on the evil clowns later]

    “Chairwoman Shockadelic must have recently made a huge withdrawal from the First National Bank of Lies.’

    “I would like to go on, but I do have to keep this letter short. So I’ll wrap it up by saying that the extent of collaboration between Chairwoman Crock Of Shockadelic and warped perverts is unknown but presumably significant.”
    [very]

  34. zulu: “we do have anti-discrimination laws you uneducated fuckwit. thats what made this nation.”

    No, actually being VERY discriminatory “made” this nation.
    Over a century and a half of White, White and little bit more White.

    “and our laws and society are descended from greek laws”

    Plato: White.
    Socrates: White
    Aristotle: White

    “the ‘Almighty Enlightened Ones’ are our independent judicary”

    No, they’re not.
    They’re just human beings.
    They are not the gods on Mount Olympus.

    They make mistakes, they have their own preconceived notions, they get “bad mood days”.
    Otherwise there would be no wrongful convictions or corruption.

    “discrimination is not covered by freedom of speech. so fuck you dickwad”

    No, it’s not.
    Discrimination laws have nothing to do with speech.
    They pertain to employment and provision of services.

    Speech is restricted by “vilification” and “inciting racial hatred” laws.
    And it shouldn’t be, dickwad.

    “why is it always assumed that people against racism are socialists?”

    Because true liberals don’t throw a tantrum if someone has a different opinion to them, even a “despicable” opinion.

    “fascism and socialism are mutually exclusive plum”

    Only because they are rivals fruits from the same tree:
    Utopian state control

  35. I read David Cameron is calling in former Los Angeles Police chief William Bratton to function as a special advisor to the UK police, help them formulate a zero tolerance policy towards the rioters. What rubbish. Maybe we should send our police over to Los Angeles, help them get their murder rate down to something like what ours is – anyone ever think of that?

What do YOU think about this?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s