A Crash Test In Law

defame |diˈfām|
verb [ trans. ]

damage the good reputation of (someone); slander or libel
_________________________________

_________________________________

Now, let’s have a look at some public comments, made public by the people whose names appear next to each post:


_________________________________

Now, what we’ve done, is taken ALREADY PUBLIC comments, and PUBLISHED them. We take NO responsibility over what people choose to say in a public forum, with their names and pictures attached. But of course, here come the ‘law enforcers’. (LOL):

_________________________________

Time and time again, bogans. If you’re going to say something in the public forum, using your name and your picture, that’s your stupidity. If you’re going to breach the Racial Discrimination Act 1976, The Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001 and the Telecommunications Act 1997, then don’t get on your high moral horse and threaten legal action from your sweaty computer chairs.


70 thoughts on “A Crash Test In Law

  1. Widespread and severe floods throughout much of Queensland, 200,000 people affected, 10 people dead, tremendous amount of damage done, the cost estimated at some 2 billion dollars.
    Will Pakistan, Indonesia, and the many other countries that Australia has given aid to over the years come to our aid? Will they send money and aid? Will Australia send out the call for help? Will certain people DEMAND that these foreign countries help?

    OR…

    Will Australians dig deep to finance their own recovery, and will Australians roll up their sleeves to help themselves and each other…as usual?

    WHILST…

    Still giving (and being expected to keep giving) untold billions of dollars in aid and supplies to foreign nations…AND…suffering the arrival of hundreds of thousands of immigrants and refugees each year???

    • Hey Snotty,
      While I applaud your effort at derailing the topic let me address your concerns.

      Haven’t you yourself or the very people you jump to defend on this blog have said in the past that natural disasters only happened to black/Muslim/third world etc people due to the wrath of (your) god?

      So I wonder what went on in Queensland to piss off god?

      I think Rebecca has adequately pointed out the differences in GDP’s etc but I guess you’re too stupid to comprehend & your hate filled mind will fail to see the facts.

      The right wing (Non- Liberal, Leftist, Multicultist, Uni-student,Atheist, Educated) and what ever labels you chose to use governments you support like the Howard Government that was in power for 11-12 years has never appealed (send out call for help) to any country. I don’t recall UK or USA jumping to help Australia either.

      Even today with the floods in Queensland UK has not offered a penny. What are your ancestors with ‘super’ white ‘genes’ doing Scott?

      Yes! Scott, We will roll up our sleeves & help each other & mop up the mess, just like we always have in the past whilst thanking the contribution of immigrants that has enabled us to be independent financially. We did that with the Victorian bush fires.

      How much time/money did you contribute Scott??? will you forgo your centerlink payment so that money can go to help people (white) in Queensland?

      What was your contribution at the time of need when the Victorian bush fires happened?? just interested to know… 🙂

    • Hey Scotty

      Let me frame this in a term of reference that you may understand:

      I pay my taxes so that a dole-bludger like you can afford to survive. I have money and you do not. I am rich and you are poor.

      Because I am rich I can put money aside and have built up a healthy portfolio of investments.

      Your “investments” on the other hand, are probably an old Milo tin containing loose coins that you rescued from your Kmart tracky-dacks before your mum washes you clothes each month.

      Your house burns down (including your Milo tin) – you ask the government for help which is basically me and other people of my ilk who actually pay the taxes you so astutely have avoided paying.

      As much as I dislike you, I’m actually okay with this because unlike you I have a sense of humanity and altruism. I am not a small minded bigot like you.

      On the other hand, if my house burnt down – would you be coming to my rescue? Could you even consider affording to help me?

      No – because you are dirt fucking poor whilst I have private insurance to the maximum and more than enough capital to rebuild my property even if I didn’t have insurance.

      So you idiot – in this analogy I am Australia and you are Pakistan.

      You are poor and I am rich.

      I will help you because you are poor and homeless but I don’t want your charity in return because I am rich and I don’t need it – not that you could actually afford to help me even if I did want it.

      Get the picture?

      By the way, you are not just a topic derailer – you are mentally derailed as well.

    • I am sure if we were in the condition of many of the countries we give aid to we would ask for and get support from rich countries like ourselves. We are one of the only cpountries to come through the world recession practically unscathed whom do you expect to get money from??? We have enough money to support our people in need and will do so.

      As for migrants coming in to this country all of us are either migrants or decendents of migrants unless of course we are indigenous. We get a very small number of people seeking asylum compared to other countries with our wealth in reality many countries who are rally poor take millions of asylum seekers compared to our thousands.

    • In the aftermath of the QLD floods Indonesia has donated US$1 million whilst Sri Lanka donated a consignment of tea, which may not seem much but then again Sri Lanka had their own flood crisis which displaced hundreds of thousands of people. Not sure what Pakistan has donated but like Sri Lanka they have been dealing with their own flood problems.
      The truth is that a lot of countries that we help out pay us back in return, if only in a small way. Another example is in the aftermath of the Victorian bushfires Indonesia donated US 1m and Papua New Guinea US $2m, whilst it seems that all the British government offered us was their sympathy. (However the Royal Family and many British companies did donate money) We rarely hear about this in the media.

  2. Scott, you were the one complaining that everyone but yourself on this site dodged the issue, despite dodging the issue and changing the topic again and again and again. Here is yet another fabulous example of you…dodging the issue. What’s the matter, can’t think of any way to defend and justify the comments highlighted on this post so you try and introduce an entirely different topic?

  3. Scott – while you’re derailing the topic nicely, here have some data… Australia’s GDP versus Pakistan’s GDP:

    http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=wb-wdi&ctype=l&strail=false&nselm=h&met_y=ny_gdp_mktp_cd&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=country&idim=country:PAK:AUS&tstart=-315619200000&tunit=Y&tlen=49&hl=en&dl=en

    So yes, Australia will mop up the Queensland flood without expecting a significantly poorer nation (who still haven’t recovered from their own floods and mass internal migration due to same) to help out in any way.

    Oh, and hundreds of thousands of immigrants and refugees do not arrive each year. Probably around 150,000 migrants and refugees arrive in Australia each year (look up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Australia). “A total of 86 277 people indicated that they left Australia permanently in 2009–10.” (from: http://www.immi.gov.au/media/fact-sheets/05emigration.htm) leaving a total of around 63,000 more people in Australia – often contributing to the economy by working.

    But to stop derailing now.

  4. Have the racists found any actual laws you’re supposed to have broken anti-bogan? You’ve quoted an actual Act of Parliament in Victoria, yet these buffoons can’t even correctly spell the laws you’ve supposedly broken.

    • This is all a part of their “let’s pretend we know something” strategy which is supposed to frighten and intimidate people. It is a technique often used by bullies, and this is basically what and where these people are. We are all grown-ups but they haven’t moved from the playgrounds and classrooms of their youth, where they’d all get together against some kid who didn’t “fit” for some reason.

      They vilify the voiceless and the vulnerable, and gang up on people on their sites they perceive to be “weak” (women and young people for instance).

      Between the bullying, the foul sexist and racist language and the tin-foil hat paranoia it makes one concerned at the state of mental health services in this country.

  5. *Clarification on Laws
    Queensland and Victoria are the states that impose criminal and sanctions for religious and race vilification.
    Western Australia impose criminal sanctions for race.
    New South Wales and South Australia impose civil and criminal sanctions only on race.
    Tasmania imposes civil sanctions on both race and religion.
    All states also adhere to the 1975 Racial Discrimination Act which is federal law.

  6. Mmmmm… it seems that they all have “lawyer” friends. I suspect that their “lawyer” friends, based on the advice that they allegedly have provided, were not properly apprised of the situations.

    • Imagine what the poor guy on the phone at Slater and Gordon must be thinking when the bogan rings up, horrified, saying I POSTED SOME FUCKIN RACIST SHIT ON FACEBOOK AND THESE CUNTS PUT IT ON THEIR WEBSITE HOW CAN I SUE THE BASTARDS????

      • If I manned the phones:

        Please make an appointment to meet with one of our solicitors, can I have your credit card details please, it will be $300.
        Thank you very much.

        🙂

  7. Now let me see Snotty, I bet if we could be bothered we could go back through all of your rantings here and find a few instances at least where you have breached the law.

    In addition to the anti-vilification laws cited, there are sections of the Crimes Acts for each state which cover offences such as stalking, intimidation and extortion, all of which are offences committed at various times by racists.

    As well there are a number of legal precedents which further define and strengthen statute law. The main ones are:

    1. Dow Jones and Co V Gutnick [2002]

    The publication containing the defamation does not have to originate in Australia for the defamation to be actionable.

    More detail here and here

    2. Jones V Toben [2002]

    On a publicly available website, the publication of racially vilifying material whether text, graphics, audio or video, on a web site that is not password protected, is an act which causes words, sounds, images or writing to be communicated to the public under s 18C(2) and is in breach of that act.

    More information here

  8. defame |diˈfām|
    verb [ trans. ]

    damage the good reputation of (someone); slander or libel

    Which has nothing to do with generalisations about groups,
    only specific individuals (e.g. Mr Iskanda Mattadulli, of 56 Jentrin Street, Knoxville, not “ragheads”).

    Oooh, another “list”.

    Would you ever care to actually refer these matters to the appropriate authorities, or are you scared these trivial cases would set a legal precedent of “Who cares?”.

    • Shockadelic: “Would you ever care to actually refer these matters to the appropriate authorities, or are you scared these trivial cases would set a legal precedent of “Who cares?”
      The bogan trash named and shamed on this site are now caring. You care – very much so, otherwise, you wouldn’t spend so much time writing essays on this site and defending the inbreds who feature in it. Once again, you haven’t read about the purpose of the site as you repeatedly show that you have no clue about why it exists. The site’s purpose is to expose dumb racists:

      We take screenshots of comments already made public, by members of the public in the online arena. We critique them and present them to the same audience as they originally posted to. Many of their comments can be taken as being inciting, hateful, discriminatory, racist and sexist. Context remains irrelevant in all posts. Several comments serve as evidence of breaches of the Anti Discrimination Act 1970 and also the Telecommunications Act 1997.

    • wank·er (wngkr)
      n. Chiefly British Vulgar Slang
      1. A person who masturbates.
      2. A detestable person.

      Which has everything to do with general people like you,
      and specific individuals (e.g. you, yourself, Shockadelic).

      Oooh, another useless waste of time post from you.

      Would you ever care to actually keep your toxic thoughts to yourself for a change, or are you a scared, little trivial piece of fecal matter that just *has* to share every bit of inane gumpf that crosses that vacuous little mind of yours? Ultimately whenever I read anything that you write I am left with only one response – “Who cares?” – actually make that two responses – also: “Who gives a flying fuck?”.

  9. Terror AUSTRALIS!!! said
    “So you idiot – in this analogy I am Australia and you are Pakistan.
    You are poor and I am rich.”

    And your analogy is bunk.
    You and Scott are citizens of the same “community”.
    Australia and Pakistan are not.

    You are also not letting Scott move into *your* house.

    You are also confusing your alleged altruism with the state’s.
    You claim it is your own altruism that is helping Scott, but its not.

    A *third party* with greater authority, the government, is making these decisions, and you have no say in them whatsoever.

    Your “analogy” confuses two different agents: you and the government.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aid
    “Aid (also known as international aid, overseas aid, or foreign aid) is a *voluntary* transfer of resources from one country to another”
    There is nothing voluntary about tax collection.

    The only way this analogy would be valid is if Australia and Pakistan were joined in an inextricable mutual union of some kind (a “society”), both subservient to a greater authority (analogous to a “government that compulsorily collects taxes and pays welfare”).

    You and Scott *must* live in the same society, whether you help each other or not.
    You must both submit to the same political authority.

    There is no analogous society that Australia and Pakistan must share (“the planet” is not a society, it’s a geographical space).

    Get the picture?

    • Shockadelic: You and Scott are citizens of the same “community”. Australia and Pakistan are not.
      That’s why it’s called an analogy. Look it up in the dictionary. Next.

    • Shockadelic: Your “analogy” confuses two different agents: you and the government.
      Christ, you really do not know the meaning of the word analogy!

  10. Snotty hasn’t returned since his arse got owned. 😦
    But shock moron has, “No brain – No shame” seem to be his motto.”

    FFS! Shock, stick to what you are good at; cock sucking, at least that ain’t infuriating.
    What are you demented????

    Due to globalisation countries are like individuals in the ‘society’ – world.
    Government of Australia is appointed by its people to represent people of Australia because it is not practical for all 22 million to be there & do that.

    I thought a 13 year old knew this?? *sigh! 😦

    • M-Dawg: “FFS! Shock, stick to what you are good at…”
      You mean being a complete and utter hypocrite, constantly changing the topic, and being dishonest when trying to debate? That’s all he seems to be good at…

  11. The “topics” on this site cannot possibly be ‘derailed’!
    This site is set up with the express purpose of opposing and insulting Australians that speak out against what is being done tho their country, and in the longrun to further the degradation and fracturing of Australia through the mass importation of alien races and clashing cultures.
    Sometimes I tackle the “topic” of a post on here, at others I simply use this as an opportunity to confront the general ignorance and sheer malice of liberals and the multicult agenda.

    What right do you, “M-Dawg” (M-Dawg? Really!), have to even mention “derailing”, when you brazenly throw your lot in with the vindictive derailing of Australia from it’s formerly assured and brilliant trajectory?

    The convolutions of self-loathing white liberals is near to mind-bending as well…just HOW could immigrants help US with OUR financial independence???
    How can anyone be independent while being made dependent upon others???

    Australia’s independence can only be assured as the racially homogenous and culturally coherent nation that we were, and still can and should be.

    I don’t know where you get this “dole bludging” thing from, for I was working and paying taxes, likely back when you were barely into pre-school.
    It’s astounding as well, the contradictions of people such as yourself and the agenda that you subscribe to! For last year alone, some 240,000 foreigners migrated here, to stay, for good…just HOW do you imagine a country that enjoyed a hard-earned high standard of living can continue to do so as each year hundreds of thousands of foreigners arrive?

    There’s no “your god”.
    First of all, give God the respect at least of a capital.
    There is God, one God.
    God is only yours/mine in the personal sense.

    Why do people such as yourself, and your libertine cronies here, hate your own race, nation, society, and civilisation so much?
    Why?
    Do you think that there are similar attitudes amongst the nationalities arriving here about themselves and their own?
    Do you think if by some chance they had been able to create a society like Australia they would so rashly give it away?

    Make no mistake, mass immigration aids the finances of anyone BUT the genuine Australian!

    You, and your liberal cohorts here, AVOID the entire crucial issue here, that each “topic” on this site revolves around!

    By the way, “arse got owned”? Why are you so obsessed with ‘homophobia’ and with arses getting owned?

    Essentially, as long as mass immigration continues eventually all of our arses will get owned, for a while, until we are discarded.

    NO society can survive racial dissolution and mass immigration of foreign groups.

    Australia is being derailed, being drievn off the rails by scum with nought but cynicism for Australians.
    We can, however, get this grand engine back on the right track again!

    • The “topics” on this site cannot possibly be ‘derailed’!
      This site is set up with the express purpose of opposing and insulting Australians that speak out against what is being done tho their country, and in the longrun to further the degradation and fracturing of Australia through the mass importation of alien races and clashing cultures.
      Sometimes I tackle the “topic” of a post on here, at others I simply use this as an opportunity to confront the general ignorance and sheer malice of liberals and the multicult agenda.

      You just detailed it moron, & here I am responding to your drivel & not talking about the law. Now that is ‘derailment’ from a topic. FFS! get an education, you’re giving La Trobe uni a bad name. Drop out NOW! if you already haven’t. 🙂

      What right do you, “M-Dawg” (M-Dawg? Really!), have to even mention “derailing”, when you brazenly throw your lot in with the vindictive derailing of Australia from it’s formerly assured and brilliant trajectory?

      I have every right to, well more than you anyways!.
      WTF are you on about?? I haven’t done any of that. I’d feel very powerful if I could single handedly achieve anything of that magnitude, but why would I do that to myself?? I’m not some masochistic fool. I live here you moron, I want the best for the country & I work towards that goal, unlike you I make positive contributions, not just be a keyboard warrior.
      You have been warned once! NO FUCKING LABELS!

      “The convolutions of self-loathing white liberals is near to mind-bending as well…”

      wtf?? I love myself 🙂

      just HOW could immigrants help US with OUR financial independence???

      Has been explained to you before by many had knowledge and qualifications in Finance, but I guess you are a lost cause.

      Australia’s independence can only be assured as the racially homogenous and culturally coherent nation that we were, and still can and should be.

      Your fucking opinion mother fucker! 🙂
      water off a duck’s back, till you substantiate your claim. 🙂

      I don’t know where you get this “dole bludging” thing from, for I was working and paying taxes, likely back when you were barely into pre-school.

      Well why don’t you tell us Scott, Where do you work? (Not a geographical location) & what you do to pay taxes?
      You should’ve, I’m only as half as old as you are and I will never get the opportunity to catch up. 😦

      It’s astounding as well, the contradictions of people such as yourself and the agenda that you subscribe to! For last year alone, some 240,000 foreigners migrated here, to stay, for good…just HOW do you imagine a country that enjoyed a hard-earned high standard of living can continue to do so as each year hundreds of thousands of foreigners arrive?

      Reference???
      TAB gave you a figure of 100000 or so leaving Australia permanently a year, referenced an immigration department link.
      You are yet to respond to that, so I will give how much of a shit to your 240000 figure plucked out of your arse??? Zilch, Zero. 🙂

      There is one Easter Bunny, My Easter Bunny.
      There is no god, imaginary friends after the age of four is kind a un-cool. 🙂

      Why do people such as yourself, and your libertine cronies here, hate your own race, nation, society, and civilisation so much?
      Why?

      Says you! I love all of that, I love my self may be even a bit too much.
      I just hate stupid racist assoles like you.

      Not to mention you’re sponging off my tax money. Hey while you are talking about the floods in Queensland, how much did you donate to the flood relief appeal?? Call 1800 219 028, show your love to fellow Australians.

      “Make no mistake, mass immigration aids the finances of anyone BUT the genuine Australian!”

      What is it? some kind of certified Organic? Australian..
      You are anything but, so it shouldn’t affect you.

      “You, and your liberal cohorts here, AVOID the entire crucial issue here, that each “topic” on this site revolves around!”

      Fuck off with the generalising!! I can’t speak for all but for me the crucial issue is in 2011 there are un-evolved assoles like you breathing the same air as I do & that bothers me a LOT!

      “By the way, “arse got owned”? Why are you so obsessed with ‘homophobia’ and with arses getting owned?”

      “arse got owned” is not a phrase related with homophobia or homosexuality or any sexual activity for that matter. It means you lost badly.
      Oh! & tell your ‘arse’ buddy Shock, that I didn’t have to take a class to work out what or how an analogy worked.

      “Essentially, as long as mass immigration continues eventually all of our arses will get owned, for a while, until we are discarded.”

      It is inappropriate use of the phrase, but I get what you mean.
      Not mine Scotty, I have acquired a highly sort after set of skills that I will be top dog in any English speaking society. If I bothered to learn another language I can widen my opportunities or even they will pay for an interpreter to obtain my services. 😉
      So even this elusive dooms day arrived I won’t be discarded, but you will be, so this dooms day is sounding much more appealing to me than today! 🙂

      NO society can survive racial dissolution and mass immigration of foreign groups.

      Australia is being derailed, being drievn off the rails by scum with nought but cynicism for Australians.
      We can, however, get this grand engine back on the right track again!

      Opinion of a unemployed 40 year old wanker living with his mum.
      Ok let’s get the engine back then Scotty, you start with yours & I will start killing all dole bludging useless twats so we can use the money for development & running engines. Yeah?

      • @ M-Dawg! – ROFL!

        “Your fucking opinion mother fucker!
        water off a duck’s back, till you substantiate your claim. ”

        Scott – I have copied and pasted this and will use this every time your write your retarded drivel from hereon.

  12. Scott: The “topics” on this site cannot possibly be ‘derailed’! This site is set up with the express purpose of opposing and insulting Australians that speak out against what is being done tho their country…
    Wrong and wrong. Yes the topics on this site can be derailed – you just did, by responding to a topic posted here with completely irrelevant “points” (and were subsequently owned). This post is about the idiocy of the bogans exposed by this website when it comes to the law. You’re talking about the Queensland floods. That, dickhead, is called derailing the topic. And it comes from someone who urged every other commenter on this site to stick to the issue. This site has an “about” page – read it before spouting off one of your ill informed rants about its purpose. Grow a brain, Scott, you’re a fucking embarrassment to this country and you do not speak for the majority of Australians.

  13. Why Why : “Christ, you really do not know the meaning of the word analogy!”

    Yes, that’s why Terror’s is wrong.
    An analogy is a comparison between things to show similarities.
    His is supposedly about Australia and Pakistan, two agents, one rich one poor.
    His “analogy” however introduced a *third* agent, beyond Terror (Australia) and Scott (pakistan): the government which compulsorily taxes Terror to pay Scott.
    For this to be a true “analogy” there would have to be a thrid party which compulsorily takes money from Australia (not AUstrlia itslef, a *third* party) and gives it to Pakistan.
    Since foregin aid is volutarily given by Australia (Terror), not a *thrid* party, the analogy is false.

    There is no compulsion for Ausstrlia to give aid.
    There is for Terror to pay taxes.

    If Terror hadmade an anolgy about giving his persoanl money *directly* to Scott, the analogy would be true.
    this is not what he said.
    He referred to the indirect transference of money, compulsoruly aquired, by a third agent.

    There is no trird agent in the Australia/Pakistan comparison. Thereoifre no analogy.

    M-Dawg!! “Due to globalisation countries are like individuals in the ‘society’ – world.”

    No, there is no global society.
    A society may be said to exist between *some* countries, with mutual interests and commonalities.
    But no such “society” exists on a *global* scale.

    And it is irrelevant to the error in the “analogy” anyway.
    The analogy involves a *thrid* agent.
    Who is the thrid agent, M-Dawg?
    The third agent that takes money from Australia and decides to give it to Oakistan?

    You cannot claim to be making an “analogy” between
    (1) 2 parties (directly volunatruly interacting) and \
    (2) 3 partiies (indirectly compusolriy interacting).
    That’s *not* an “analogy”!!

    Go back to school, 13-year-old.

    Scott “By the way, “arse got owned”? Why are you so obsessed with ‘homophobia’ and with arses getting owned?”

    M-Dawg was going to do a class on Analogy once.
    He thought it something to do with Anal.

  14. Shockadelic: “His “analogy” however introduced a *third* agent, beyond Terror (Australia) and Scott (pakistan): the government which compulsorily taxes Terror to pay Scott.”
    The analogy is a very simple one yet everyone but you understands it. TA represents Australia (rich) while Scott represents Pakistan (poor). A rich country like Australia shouldn’t ask for aid from a poor country (which is what Scott is attempting to argue).

    Shockadelic: That’s *not* an “analogy”!! Go back to school, 13-year-old.
    PMSing, Shocky? Your best friend Scott’s ass was owned. By trying to defend the clinical precision with which TA handed Scott’s ass to him on a platter, you sound just like the intellectually vapid screaming hissy-fit throwing scene queen intellectual wannabe that you are.

  15. Shockaholic – what a nit-picking little shit you are.

    Dictionary.com:

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/analogy

    a·nal·o·gy   /əˈnælədʒi/ [uh-nal-uh-jee]

    –noun, plural -gies.
    1. a similarity between like features of two things, on which a comparison may be based: the analogy between the heart and a pump.

    You on the other hand:

    But…but… but… but an analogy is a comparison between things to show similarities. *sob*

    This is supposedly about a heart.
    This “analogy” however introduced a *mechanical* agent and a heart is organic.

    For this to be a true “analogy” there would have to be another organic object that transfers blood from one part of the body to another.

    Since pumps principally deal with non-blood related liquid transferral then the “analogy” is clearly false.

    THERE ARE JUST TOO MANY VARIABLES – I CAN’T COPE!!!!

    The best analogy for a heart is this:

    A heart reminds me of a hollow, pumplike organ of blood circulation, composed mainly of rhythmically contractile smooth muscle, located in the chest between the lungs and slightly to the left and consisting of four chambers: a right atrium that receives blood returning from the body via the superior and inferior vena cavae, a right ventricle that pumps the blood through the pulmonary artery to the lungs for oxygenation, a left atrium that receives the oxygenated blood via the pulmonary veins and passes it through the mitral valve, and a left ventricle that pumps the oxygenated blood, via the aorta, throughout the body.

    *********************************

    Good enough an analogy for you Shock-tard?

    Fucking tool.

  16. Terror AUSTRALIS!!! (02:36:32) : “Shockaholic – what a nit-picking little shit you are.
    Dictionary.com:
    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/analogy
    1. a similarity between like features of *two things*, on which a *comparison* may be based: the analogy between the heart and a pump.
    You on the other hand:
    But…but… but… but an analogy is a *comparison* between things to show similarities. *sob*

    On the other hand?

    Two things (not three)
    Similarities = like features
    Comparison = comparison

    My definition is *exactly the same* as the dictionary: You compare two things to show the like features/similarities.

    “This is supposedly about a heart.”

    Nobody even mentioned a heart.

    You made a comparison between You/Australia and Scott/Pakistan.
    But in your analogy “you” aren’t “Australia”.
    You are still you.
    Paying taxes *to* Australia.
    Who then gives money to Scott.

    If you had made an “analogy” with giving money directly to Scott yourself, *that* would be a correct analogy.
    You didn’t do that.

    Foreign aid is a voluntary direct transference between Australia and Pakistan.
    For your analogy to be correct, there would have to be a voluntary direct transference between you and Scott.
    Not through a *third* party.

    Hearts and pumps.
    “This “analogy” however introduced a *mechanical* agent and a heart is organic.”

    There’s no reason why you can’t make an analogy between a machine and an organism (organisms are living machines anyway, aren’t they?).
    It depends on why you’re making the analogy, the elements you compare.

    “For this to be a true “analogy” there would have to be another organic object that transfers blood from one part of the body to another.”

    *Why* are you introducing a third object?
    You’re not making any sense.
    A heart and pump is two things, not three.
    You’re making the *same mistake again*, including some third element in your “analogy” that shouldn’t be there.

    “Since pumps principally deal with non-blood related liquid transferral then the “analogy” is clearly false.”

    What liquid is pumped makes no difference to the comparison.
    Analogies are not literal.

    “The best analogy for a heart is this:”

    No, that’s a description.

    Terror gives his own money to Scott is analogous to Australia gives Pakistan money.
    Terror pays taxes to Australia to give to Scott is not.

  17. May be someone will spell it out for you, how ‘i-g-n-o-r-i-n-g’ works in a blog post’s context & then you can nit pick on that with your dictionary definition & introducing third parties & what not.

    But that won’t be me.

    Irksome TURD!

  18. THE VINDICTIVE DERAILING OF AUSTRALIA FORM ITS FORMALY ASSURED AND BRILLIANT TRAJECTORY. THE VINDICTIVE DERAILING OF AUSTRALIA FORM ITS FORMALY ASSURED AND BRILLIANT TRAJECTORY. THE VINDICTIVE DERAILING OF AUSTRALIA FORM ITS FORMALY ASSURED AND BRILLIANT TRAJECTORY. THE VINDICTIVE DERAILING OF AUSTRALIA FORM ITS FORMALY ASSURED AND BRILLIANT TRAJECTORY. THE VINDICTIVE DERAILING OF AUSTRALIA FORM ITS FORMALY ASSURED AND BRILLIANT TRAJECTORY. THE VINDICTIVE DERAILING OF AUSTRALIA FORM ITS FORMALY ASSURED AND BRILLIANT TRAJECTORY. THE VINDICTIVE DERAILING OF AUSTRALIA FORM ITS FORMALY ASSURED AND BRILLIANT TRAJECTORY. THE VINDICTIVE DERAILING OF AUSTRALIA FORM ITS FORMALY ASSURED AND BRILLIANT TRAJECTORY.

  19. I discovered your site yesterday and i love it!!!!! It’s great to see that other people who hold similar views to me. On the other hand it’s sad that there are other people (hopefully a minority) who hold views such as those on that FB page as well as those of Scott. I guess that’s why this website was set up in the first place. Oh and I really do hate bogans with a passion (along with reality tv, cold chisel, 4WD’s classless macmansions…hang on they’re often interchangable with boganism arent’ they?)

  20. Just found your site TAB, well done, keep up the good work! We can’t make bogans disappear unfortunately, but exposing them and documenting their behavior is a good start.

    Very, very amusing to see these uneducated idiots threaten you for displaying their own public comments! 🙂

  21. I would high-five the people that run this site if I knew you. Go the anti-bogans! ♥ The ignorant people that make these disgusting comments are the ones STEALING OUR JOBS and WASTING SPACE in this grand country.

  22. They talk about charging this website for cyber bullying but isn’t it just posting the bullying remarks of them on here? If they try to take down the site on those charges, they’ll have to be fined as well. Reading the things some people have the audacity to say just makes me feel sick. What makes them feel so superior to people of other races/sexes etc? Its only by a stroke of chance that it’s not them forced to take the horrific journey by boat to a country where they have the right to walk down the street without the having the fear of being shot.
    These people deserve to be publicly shamed for their comments, along with all the people who thumbs up or encourage their words. It’s people like these that prevent our country for living harmoniously.

  23. Charlotte said “They talk about charging this website for cyber bullying”

    Now how much do you like the Thought Police and their rabid regulation of speech, TAB?

    “but isn’t it just posting the bullying remarks of them on here?”

    It is possible to bully a bully.
    And rape a rapist.
    And murder a murderer.

    “If they try to take down the site on those charges, they’ll have to be fined as well.”

    Only if you consider lawful prosecution “bullying”.

  24. Pingback: One Year Ago – TAB Under ‘Attack’ « anti-discrimination

What do YOU think about this?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s