OMG R U Serious??

Australia Day is changing its name to Multicultural Day. Okay, well it’s not, but let’s not let that get in the way of making up stories to stoke the patriotic xenophobic fires. Add a little bit of ‘why do they say it’s racist to take pride in our country’, when the people who call you racist don’t do so simply because you’re proud of your country. We all are. If we weren’t proud of our country, we wouldn’t care so much about booting turkey slaps like these out of here. They give the rest of us a bad name.

On a side note, January 26th might be a significant part of our history, but it’s important to remember that it represents invasion and land occupancy to our Indigenous people. Having a national day of celebration for the anniversary of when Aboriginal people were given the vote and counted as Australians in the census, or the National apology would be certainly worth embracing if anything were to ever happen to Australia Day…

But’s that’s enough blaspheming.

128 thoughts on “OMG R U Serious??

  1. Isn’t it interesting how the majority of racist, idiotic and downright ignorant comments that are made are made by those with an inability to spell? As well as the content of their comments, it speaks volumes about their level of education…

  2. I wish we could do away with Australia Day and simmer down the convected grief and gratitude over Anzac day…We desperately need a day that includes all Australians. A national multicultural day would be pretty good I reckon.

    • Rodriguez, its cunts like you that cause bogan like behaviour. You need to smacked in the back of the head with a baseball bat and sent back to whatever shithole country you came from. I bet you still support your homelands soccer team, ever though you purport to be Australian. Hope you contraqct swine flu and die dickhead

      • Talking about soccer, Australia, really, really sucks. The way they are developing it is very nativist and concerned about bringing them home. The Americans are busy levelling them up and exporting them to Europe.

        Btw, Rodriguez could just be an internet name, just as I am Rudolf Belka, and I could be German, Asian, English, French and anything actually. So STFU.

  3. OMG I had the multicultural day story pulled on me by someone while posting about Invasion Day on facebook earlier this year. It goes without saying it’s nothing new, but some are just far too thick to see it.

    • Jayden (cool name headcheese), yes invasion day, the day that white man came to this country. But what if Indonesian colonised Australia, all the black fella’s would have been killed and turned into satay sticks. So where do you get off you tool. Your another canditate for a smack in the mouth. Now go and suck daddy’s cock.

  4. I love Australia Day and wouldn’t want to see it removed -it also happens to be at a great time of year for a public holiday.

    I wouldn’t object at all if there was a separate day to celebrate all our wonderful cultures (well, most of them).

    • Yeah most of em, exactly brother, im with you. Lets have a national multicultural day and just keep the fucking towel heads out. Yeeeeha, fucken goat fuckers.

      • Ahah – I read that with my “polite filter” on and my brain presented it to me as, “Let’s have towel head day, the day we all dry the curls.”

        Seriously, I would be all for a day we wear towel turbans on our heads after a good hair wash. TOWEL HEADS DAY!

  5. Rodriguez, on the off chance your username reflects your heritage I think it is a bit rude to ask Australians to “simmer down” ANZAC day.Foreigners or their bagpipers will never gain any traction with that one.

    • At the very least, one can simmer down Australia Day, and leave it as a fine time for families to enjoy a holiday in peace, and an opportunity to reach out to one another, instead of a day where people get bashed.

    • Are you suggesting that someone whose surname is Rodriguez is less of an Australian than a Smith or a Jones, and has less of a right to talk about what happens in his country? Do you really want to go down the path of saying who can and can’t have an opinion based on surnames and racial heritage? There I was thinking people were equal before the law…

      • “Before the law” The law is a fucken joke, created in parliaiment by morons like Kevin Rudd and his band of merry ass fuckers. We are all equally, we have the right to our own opinion, we have the right to dislke sponging boat people that claim to be oppressed. Suck my balls, you are just as low as an aids germ inside the uterus of a 75 year old hooker from Kabul.

  6. Rodriguez is unlikely to have any ties to that era of Australia, so it is best they dont explain what we should or should’nt do.I would’nt migrate to Asia nd then presume I could tell the Asians to simmer down their national days.It would be rude.I would’nt do that in ANY country I’d migrate to,not unless I had some tie to the event.

    • No, you don’t have the right to determine what Rodriguez can or cannot say about Australia based on his ethnic heritage. That would be using freedom of speech as a cover for racism (which you don’t seem to get worked up about as much as using freedom of speech to criticise ANZAC day, which in turn ironically illustrates Rodriguez’s point about how it is exclusionary and jingoistic and should be simmered down-because of idiots like you who have a race-based structure determining freedom of speech and because you believe that immigrants don’t have ties to ANZAC day).

    • I should add that racists like you can’t seem to grasp that when someone migrates here and takes up citizenship they are Australian, not foreigners. Racists find that incredibly difficult to grasp for some reason, and take affront at migrants – who are Australian – expressing their opinions, the usual retort being ‘don’t tell us what to do, you are not one of us, you are guests here in your own country’. Rodriguez uses ‘we’ in his post implying that he or she is Australian. Yet-typical racist-you criticise his or her post on the basis of a foreign sounding name.

      • I repeat.there is no use in crying “freedom of speech whch is not enshrined in this country.We are not covered under the Amerca constitution.Anzac day IS Australian and an important event for most Australians.How is it exclusionary ?? It is not meant to be a forum for jingoistic leftist/multicultural claptrap.

        Im enjoying the low emotional control here,it is apparant .More fucks than a brothel

        If someone wants to come in then they need to accept what we have, noone should be asked to “tone down” anything. Say what you mean…”we have issues with ANZAC day because it is traditon created by white people”.

        We need “idiots like you” to stop wanting to change everything from the flag to holiday traditions for being too Anglo but demanding we fully accomodate all traditions practised by newcomers…….

  7. Excuse me, my name – internet or otherwise – is not of Anglo origin, yet I was born and bred here, and all the family that matter to me are here. And I have as much tie to Australia Day as anyone with an Anglo name. big_baggies, no one has the right to tell anyone what they can and can’t say – it’s democracy and with it comes freedom of speech; the real freedom of speech, NOT the one the FOWF crowd go on about.

    The Aborigines rightfully can say that it is their Invasion Day. They are not hurting anyone by saying this. They are stating how they feel about the day. They aren’t saying “Anglos, we’re full, fuck off and go home”. The biggest common denominator here is lack of care or thought for the other.

    • Look Ummmmm, you fucken slope head, the coons didn’t tell us to fuck of cause ‘we’re full” because they could see the light. Here comes white man to our rescue, oooh, they created a wheel, fuck this ancient way of life we live, these white cunts are great, in a few generations we will win the right to vote, then we can do that Lebbo thing and cry, COMPENSATION, we will get free money from Centrelink and due to our inability to finish school, we will be given token jobs, just because we are coons. And best of all, we were too stupid to make alcohol and the white man can make it for us. Yeah, let these white cunts in hey. Now considering, my good mate, Jigaboo John is a coon, I have the right to say these things that I am sure you will toss and turn about. JUST SAY NO TO MUSLIMS, THEY ARE GOING TO FUCK THE PLANET.

  8. What is the “excuse me” for ?

    Trying to play down the importance of ANZAC day won’t work. with talk about a “simmer down” then the person is clearly indicating that the importance of the day needs to be slowed down because it is a White Anglo based tradtion.You forget the Aboriginal defenders of Australia too .

    I know Aboringinals who served in Korea and your opinion would piss them off, so dont act like you have the personal approval of the Aboriginal population.

    BTW the “freedom of speech” just reeks of too much U.S tv.We hve no enshrined “freedom of speech” rights.It looks ridiculous to even use such a defence to undermine ANZAC day as a concept.

    “They aren’t saying “Anglos, we’re full, fuck off and go home”

    YES! Because Anglo Australia goes on a mad rampage every national holiday draped in flags and bashing people.You’re extrapolating one event to some kind of rampant Australian tradition and having the audacity to come at the argument with that in your head.

    • No, Rodriguez didn’t say ANZAC day should be toned down because it was am Anglo tradition-you’re trying very hard to play the victim card. It was because the exclusionary nature of the day (an exclusion that you have exemplified, by declaring who is allowed to feel ties to the day and who hasn’t based on their surnames)

  9. You ARE attacking…!
    Our traditions are victims.

    He is excluding himself….did’nt you notice ?He said I dont identify withe themotivationsof theday.He described itin terms “convected grief &gratitude” He clearly has no grasp of the meaning, he did’nt mention inclusion, he implied a tone down. Why ?? the point of the day is grief & gratitude.

    • “I repeat.there is no use in crying “freedom of speech whch is not enshrined in this country.We are not covered under the Amerca constitution.”
      And I repeat, it doesn’t matter. People are allowed to criticise how ANZAC Day is celebrated irrespective of their cultural backgrounds. You need to deal with that. Your sudden concern for our constitution reeks of hypocrisy when you aren’t concerned about how it is used as a cover for racism. You are only concerned about it when it is used as a cover to criticise ANZAC day – which doesn’t break the law (but hate speech does). Also, your knowledge of freedom of speech is limited – we don’t have a First Amendment but freedom of speech IS implied in our constitution when it comes to political matters. The only things on this site that break Australia’s provisions for free speech are the racist comments. this site uncovers – but these racist comments don’t bother you one bit even though they are being made under the auspices of freedom of speech.

      Rodriguez is not excluding him or herself – simply pointing out how he or she is made to feel on ANZAC day – a feeling caused I suspect by idiots like you. And you emphasise just HOW idiotic you are with your comment:

      “We need “idiots like you” to stop wanting to change everything from the flag to holiday traditions for being too Anglo but demanding we fully accomodate all traditions practised by newcomers……”

      The pathetic thing about your comment is that THIS VERY BLOG ENTRY on which you are commenting is about how brain-dead racists such as yourself are all too quick to make up lies (about how migrants and lefties want to change things) to justify their racism. I’d comment on the irony…but then again, racist bogan idiots like you don’t understand irony.

      • Noone said anything about not being allowed to celebrate Anzac day based on their heritage.Im attacking those who are clearly recent arrivals who opt to attack it and expect no recourse.

        Ive lived in many countries and one thing I would never imagine doing, as it would be the height of rudeness, is to presume that because I spent many years in a place I should denigrate their national holidays, question them & suggest the locals tone it down a bt.I’d get a lot worse reaction than the average aussie would give.Even those countries who suggest they are “mulicultural” does not mean that the majority of people want the minority groups having digs at their traditions and culture.It is up to us to adapt, not for them to have to adapt to us.Multiculturalism is no excuse.White Australians are still well over 90% of inhabitants in this country.

        You use the word “racist” way too much and make the word very ineffective.

  10. …racist bogan idiot…blah blah blah..is all I see here,.Change the record,.
    You lose, your arguments gain no traction, Australians generally hate people like you….so go ahead.

  11. …racist bogan idiot…blah blah blah..is all I see here,.Change the record,.

    Yes whenever you and your two or three friends post. What you are in denial about is firstly the fact that you are racist bogans and secondly the fact that you do not represent mainstream Australia.

    You are not going to change the minds of any other people who post here, nor is TAB going to smite their collective foreheads and say that you are right. So why bother unless you wish to continue to show yourself as an offensive bigot? Stormfart publishes racist rants, go over there and you’ll be with your own kind.

  12. Sorry Josh but Im very sure I’ve spent a lot more time with people of non Anglo heritage than you or anyone here.I lived in the UAE for years, I’ve lived in Malaysia, Hong Kong, Macau and on and on.

    Im a bigot because Im asking how Anzac day isexclusionary ?? Someone called Rodriguez says the day is merely about “convectd grief” and suggests a simmer down and noone is allowed to be offended by that ?
    If someone gets offended then you launch your “you’re a racist” attack ??

    So, HOW is ANZAC day exclusionary ? Which practices and tradtions are you talking about ? You need far better examples than rounding on people who are rightfully offended when you arrogantly cultivate all other ethnic traditions while suggesting australians should change theirs.

    There is no “lies that lefties want to change everything because it is a fact, they are angry all the time, they are angry at the flag, the anthem, at our culture(oh sorry we dont have one!), at our tradtions and traditional holidays, at the majority who do not want mass immigration, it goes on.

  13. I am sure any “traditions” I might observe bear no relation to what you assume are “Australian”. Strangely enough most of us are not interested in the usual chest-beating “patriotism” of ignorant yobbo culture. We don’t need tatts to tell us which country we come from, nor do we use the flag as a sweaty neck-rag. We also do not regard women as either a separate species or as a convenient accessory.

    For instance real Australians would like ANZAC Day kept quietly as a solemn commemoration of the awfulness of war and of the lives lost in wars, not as an excuse for a piss-up with its attendant capacity for violence and its thrusting loudmouth “Stryans” who if the truth were known wouldn’t be fit to serve in any Army anywhere.

    Real Australians have no problem acknowledging that the for the Indigenous people of Australia, Australia Day was the day their country was invaded and occupied by strangers.

    Real Australians have no problem with the notion that Australia is a society where Indigenous and immigrant people and their descendants live harmoniously side-by-side.

    Real Australians know that part of their obligations in a secular democracy is to recognise, acknowledge and tolerate the religious beliefs (or non-beliefs) of all its citizens.

    Real Australians recognise that racism and bigotry, whether crudely expressed by the semi-literate or couched in the language of spin, manipulation and mendacity, is illegal. Not only is it illegal, it is immoral and degrading to its victims.

    Real Australians will not have the nature of this country, its values and its traditions defined by haters and bigots.

    • And I bet you would be to gutless to go to war Josh, just a little maggot you are. How’s mum going mate, tell her I will be over to fill her ass with my jism. YYYYEEEEEEEEEEHA. Can you ask her to was her fanny though, it was a bit poony last time.

      • And you think you’re brave enough to face machine gun fire, sniper fire, rocket attacks, all from nowhere in particular? Infact its people who think they are SO BRAVE that are more likely to end up with PTSD.

  14. Yes, there are “Australian” traditions that may be of European heritage or influence but still all our own.Anzac day Is all our own, as is Australia day.I have seen decades of ANZAC days and not once seen “violence & loudmouths” that just reeks of you being a bigot.I dont care if people have “piss ups” that Is part of the tradition, to relax, be with friends and have a drink and most do it with utmost civility.You have a problem with that ?
    What you are trying to do is loosely tie in Anzac day to an unhealthy patriotism so you espouse rubbish like “they get drunk, bash people an make them kiss the flag” when in actual fact it simply is a myth.

    For people who seems almost obsessive in yor concerns about “racism” you seems very happy to attack people by even calling them every name the Gods ever came up with.To me there is no difference between people you call racist scum and scum who call people “racist fuckin prick” both are incapable of emotional control and best avoided.Both undermine their own arguments .

    The rest of your post is just soapboxing and has no relevance.

  15. You don’t really think I am awestruck by your alleged” experience” do you now? Anyone can say that, and equally anyone who reads it can generally take it with a large bucket of salt.

    Interesting traditions you like to support.

    Racism is illegal and racists not only break the law but bring shame and disgrace upon their country. I think the ANZACs you so admire probably would have thought of them as traitors, since so many soldiers died fighting the very Fascism which drives them and which you apparently support.

  16. Our soldiers didnt die fighting fascism.MY Grandfather & any WW2 soldier I met always talked of their fight against “the japs”, so calm down.
    You think the allies were better people ?

  17. Josh, so you have serious reservations about Anzac day because the populations alcohol consumption is of major importance to you ? So it has nothing to do with bigoted and racist views about Anglo Australia and what it reveres ?

    Yes, becaue on Anzac day you can guarantee that white Australia will drink up and proceed to beat the crap out of each other . Maybe you need to lay off the weed.

    ok

    • There is definitely a desire to pay respects to the diggers and attend dawn services on ANZAC day. I doubt anyone will deny that.
      But you’re a fool if you choose to deny the fact that the majority of Aussies who have a beer on ANZAC day don’t stop at one or two. ANZAC day is seen as a piss up and a respect-paying day equally. But unfortunately the piss up part is devaluing the day in a devastating fashion and I would agree that those that choose to ‘celebrate’ a day of reflecting solemn loss should definitely be ‘toned down’ and given a lesson in ethics. Not toned down in terms of how much it is covered in the media, nor how RSLs get behind dawn services, nor how should remain a public holiday. But toned down in the idea that it is somehow considered a celebration and a day to get completely wasted.

      • The piss up Anazac day style is so tribal and that is what pisses you off.Tribal Anglo anything scares the hell out of you. White people have used alcohol in all their cultures and with a remarkably low “alcoholism” rate for a very long time.You wont get anywhere saying “it is all just abour beer” because everyone knows that is just the vehicle for socialising at the gatherings.We are clearly very aware of the greater sentiment of the day/.

      • Geez go and read! A book called plants of the Gods would help you. It would be abnormal for White Australia to be alcohol free for days of reverence.Every single group on Earth has used “something” to enhance the social events after a traditional ceremony.

  18. “Our soldiers didnt (sic) die fighting fascism.MY Grandfather & any WW2 soldier I met always talked of their fight against “the japs”, so calm down.”

    So the government of Japan was not Fascist? So the practice of Jingikan was not part of the apparatus of a Fascist state? So Australian soldiers did not fight Wehrmacht and Regio Esercito troops in the Middle East, North Africa and Europe?

    “You think the allies were better people ?”

    Better than whom?

    Drunken yobbos trashing ANZAC Day ? I have plenty of links like this one.

  19. big_baggies:
    “Noone said anything about not being allowed to celebrate Anzac day based on their heritage.Im attacking those who are clearly recent arrivals who opt to attack it and expect no recourse.”
    The reason you feel a broken record is being played is simple – you don’t understand the debate, thus the need to repeat points again and again. Criticising how ANZAC day is celebrated is not against the law. We don’t have a first amendment – irrelevant. People are allowed to criticise things – and yes irrespective of how long you personally have deemed their families have been in Australia (from a name on the internet, no less). Once they’re citizens they are Australian. Deal with it. ANZAC day wasn’t meant to be exclusionary – but people like you make it so because you feel there should be a hierarchy of who can and can’t criticise Australia based on what you think their ties to the country are, or how long you think they happen to have been in Australia.

    You complain that the response to idiotic comments made by racist bogans (yes like you) is always a cry of “racism”. That’s because (as Josh pointed out) you are racist. If you want a broken record look at the response from racist bogans to anyone who criticises Australia – “fuck off somewhere else then, if you don’t like it leave it”. That’s a broken record for you.

    You dismiss what Josh says as “soapboxing” because you’re too stupid to understand the truth, or don’t want to – that there is a difference between racism and calling racists insults. Of course you are keen to portray Josh’s comments as irrelevant. Of course, to you there is no difference – because Josh’s points demolish your own comments that there is no difference between denigrating racist comments, and racism.
    One is against the law. The other isn’t. You work it out.

  20. You keep shifting he goal post on why things upset you.

    The debate IS his comment.

    I dont care if I’m called racist.You do’nt get that.To me it is just a symptom of too much Americanism as demonstrated bythe “right to free spch” references.Being called racist by cetain types is par of fthe course.
    I see decent, everyday people labelled racist by people like you but they may simply be anti immigration.You alienate people from your argumenet with the violent and waspy reactions.

    Josh’s post is irrelevant in the last half. Maybe I know more productive Aboriginals than you because I know a few who have fought in wars.You offend people you claim to be speaking for.They would tell you to shutup.As for “ivasion, what can you do ? Aboriginals were colonised once.Im happy for them because we have been colonised over and over and faced bloody battles for millenia.

    • “I see decent, everyday people labelled racist by people like you but they may simply be anti-immigration.”
      I’m sure they might be. But that doesn’t deter from the fact that a) you are racist because you think people should be accorded different rights to criticise Australia based on their ethnic heritage; b) you don’t have the capacity to understand that what this site uncovers breaks Australian laws, but criticising the behaviour of people on ANZAC Day or insulting people who hold racist views does not. You don’t care if you are called racist? Good. You’ll continue to be labelled as one.

  21. And baggies, just because you claim to know a couple of Aborigines it doesn’t give YOU the right to speak on behalf of them. Aborigines are not some homogenous group who all think the same way. It’s a fact that some indigenous people do see Australia Day as invasion day – see http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/40967

    Also, your comment about living in other countries and not criticising their national day simply underlines your stupidity as well as your racism. Your example is completely irrelevant – you lived in other countries temporarily and didn’t take up citizenship or stay there permanently, unlike the people of migrant heritage you’re telling to shut up about ANZAC day because you decide that they have no ties to the day. Personally I don’t care if someone’s last name is Rodriguez or Wong or Abdullah, I don’t ask them to behave like guests in their own country.

    • Sometimes the criticisers are “just guests”…..Some live here and are citizens but do not identify with the dominant culture on any level.To me and many others that makes them mere guests.Australia is seen as a golden egg and nothing more to many people and they dont care about our traditions because they feel they dont have to.

      • Yeah and I guess the only reason refugees have sold their only belongings, said goodbye to their extended families that are still alive and climbed aboard leaky uncertain boats to face years of detention are coming here because Australia is the golden egg, right?

      • Your response simply illustrates my point – you think it’s your God-given right to determine if someone identifies or not with the dominant culture based on how long YOU think their family has stayed in Australia, and based on YOUR opinion of whether or not they have ties to ANZAC day (and ironically you criticise this website for being judgmental – the irony again!). Unfortunately, your views on this mean jack-shit to those people (as they should). The simple fact is that all citizens of Australia have a right to criticise the country no matter their ethnic heritage or YOUR OPINION of their ties to the country – and you just have to deal with it.

  22. IT might be “their own country” techically but it isnt “their “traditional heritage”.

    Yes, simply put if you are a new immigrant and want piss on and moan about Australia then why did you come here ? What do you get out of being here beyond a better lifestyle.

    Rodriguez is racist, simply put, his agitation about the day is based on race and nothing more.If Anzac day were held by the Chinese, for the same reason, Im sure he would celebrate it and call any talk of “simmer down” as racist.So , you and everyone else are simply racist. You will never admit it but the motivation for your discomfort about Anglo days of reverence is the whiteness of it all upsets you… 🙂

    • Unbelievable. Who are you even talking about when you talk about ‘their’? You do realise that our heritage for the past century has involved taking people in as citizens from all over the world, right?

      You seem to think that only ‘new immigrants’ moan about Australia-related matters. People whinge about petrol prices and supermarket costs and post office lines and alcohol costs and politicians and referees and the immigration intake and taxes and hospital queues and dodgy car salesmen and all sorts of things on a daily basis. Home grown Australians, as you’ll refer to us white Anglos, are far from being laid back, easy going fair-go merchants. We are a nation of whingers. We whinge more than the Poms that we whinge about. Who the fuck are you to suggest that being in this country for ‘x’ generations allows one to be able to complain about things in Australia.

      I’m an 8th generation Australian and I’ll complain until I’m blue in the face about the heavy drinking culture that exists in this country, and I believe that is exactly what Rodriguez was doing. Why can’t we be a nation who solemnly respect the actions of our diggers without the need to get completely shitfaced? You do realise how out of control alcohol-related violence is in this country, don’t you?

      You make reference to events held by the Chinese that go unnoticed by the ever-complaining Rodriguez, yet how much alcohol fueled violence results from the celebrations of Chinese New Year? This is an event that has hundreds of thousands of participants nation wide. ANZAC Day and Australia Day aren’t problematic in that they’re apparently reminiscent of ‘Anglo days of reverence’, but they are seen as opportunities for mass, out of control heavy drinking. And if you deny that then you’ve got your eyes closed.

      I’m an Australian who celebrates Australia Day without the need for an excessive flow of alcohol, and I recognise that the day also represents the time when the Aboriginal people were stripped of their land and any rights and freedoms they once may have enjoyed. This is not a hard thing to do. I’m an Australian who often goes to the dawn service on ANZAC Day to pay my respects to the diggers for their selflessness and courage (my grandfather was one of them), yet I don’t go ahead and spend the rest of the day getting on the cans, walking around with a cape hanging from my sweaty back, dragging through the dirt, and carrying on like an obnoxious alpha male bogan. This is not a hard thing to do.

      • Rodriguez made no mention of Australias alleged “heavy drinking culture”.Don’t speak on behalf of him because you keep bringing up unrelated matters.

        I’ve never seen “out of control”heavy drinking on Anzac day.Not sure about your crowd.I never hear anyone else complain of it. It is your red herring, your faux argument.It is still “they are too white”.

        Stop extrapolating Rodriguez post to suit your own ends.You have nearly re written everything he said and added a lot of flourishes.

        • What do you think he meant by ‘tone down’ then, Bill?
          And you’ve never seen drunken idiots on ANZAC or Australia Day? Do you leave your home?

    • “Yes, simply put if you are a new immigrant and want piss on and moan about Australia then why did you come here ?”
      Who says they WANT TO “piss on and moan about Australia”? I have no idea why you take so much offense at the idea that someone might want to criticise Australia, whose family hasn’t been here for two hundred years. I don’t understand how equality before the law is a concept that is beyond your comprehension – it’s really not that difficult to understand.

      Only a racist would assume that migrants WANT TO criticise things as a socio-political statement (instead of accepting that sometimes, maybe they have a different opinion to you (but I’m not surprised coming from you in particular – all of your contributions to this website have been based on assumptions). Only a racist would seek to enjoy freedom of speech while feeling they have the right to decide who that freedom is awarded to based on their race or ethnicity.

      Using your fucked up logic, your are declaring that new migrants have absolutely no right whatsoever to speak up against anything in Australia – that if they are discriminated against, they have to shut up; that if they are treated badly by officials, they have to shut up; that if they don’t like the public transport system, they have no right to say anything against it; that if they prefer Sydney to Melbourne, they aren’t allowed to express that opinion; that if their doctor sexually abuses them, they can’t criticise him; that if the weather is bad, they’re not allowed to say so; that if the pub down the road makes too much noise and contains violent patrons that make their children feel unsafe, they are not allowed to say anything. Sadly for people like you, there are no laws determining who has the right to criticise the country based on how long they’ve lived here.

      • Big Baggies, you’ve been served by Why Why.

        You should ask yourself why you are so adamant in brushing the views others.

  23. “I’m an 8th generation Australian and I’ll complain until I’m blue in the face about the heavy drinking culture that exists in this country, and I believe that is exactly what Rodriguez was doing”

    Why why.,..where EXACTLY does Rodriguez make even a vague mention of the claimed “drinking culture”:in Australia ?

    Where EXACTLY does he mention he feels excluded and by what exactly ?

    Some traditions are for those who started them and outsiders dont get involved because they are not part of it.This goes for traditions the world over, do I pout and demand some changes so a white Aussie can feel a part of it to ?? I would’nt be so bloody self righteous.

    • Rodriguez suggested that ANZAC/Australia Day were ‘toned down’. I’m making the assumption that he was not referring to our national sentiment, but to the loudmouthed drunken bogans that see the days as nothing but an opportunity to get shitfaced.

      I don’t recall him ever saying that he felt excluded… Did he? Would that even change the fact that these days are seen as national piss up days?

    • ““I’m an 8th generation Australian and I’ll complain until I’m blue in the face about the heavy drinking culture that exists in this country, and I believe that is exactly what Rodriguez was doing”
      Why why.,..where EXACTLY does Rodriguez make even a vague mention of the claimed “drinking culture”:in Australia ?”
      antibogan made those comments, baggies – I think you’re getting so worked up you don’t know who you are responding to.

      “Where EXACTLY does he mention he feels excluded and by what exactly ?”
      Have you bothered to read his comment?
      “I wish we could do away with Australia Day and simmer down the convected grief and gratitude over Anzac day…We desperately need a day that includes all Australians.”
      Funny that you get so upset by that comment, when this very website shows hundreds of publicly made comments that are a million times more offensive (not to mention illegal, incite violence and death, honor Nazis, and are badly spelled using profanities to boot). Your priorities are a more than a little skewed there.

  24. Using your fucked up logic, your are declaring that new migrants have absolutely no right whatsoever to speak up against anything in Australia – that if they are discriminated against, they have to shut up; that if they are treated badly by officials, they have to shut up; that if they don’t like the public transport system, they have no right to say anything against it; that if they prefer Sydney to Melbourne, they aren’t allowed to express that opinion; that if their doctor sexually abuses them, they can’t criticise him; that if the weather is bad, they’re not allowed to say so; that if the pub down the road makes too much noise and contains violent patrons that make their children feel unsafe, they are not allowed to say anything. Sadly for people like you, there are no laws determining who has the right to criticise the country based on how long they’ve lived here.”

    By your fucked up logic, new comers, often with scant loyalty to Australia beyond it’s economic system should strut around and be allowed to mouth off and denigrate our traditions and culture and demand we “simmer” it down a bit.The abuse by officials thing is unrealated to anything discussed and is just your flourish.

    • Hold on a second there, bogan… You are implying that new comers often have ‘scant loyalty to Australia’. What a fucking joke of an assumption. And logically, a person will only speak up about something they believe is wrong about society if they actually care about society. If a person has no loyalty to society, they have no inclination to want to fix the wrongs.
      Now you’re referring to Rodriguez’s comments as a ‘simmer’ down, when originally he was quoted as saying ‘tone’ down. And even though you don’t really know what he was talking about, you’re rejecting the idea that he might have been talking about the excessive drinking and yobbo behaviour that is prevalent on ANZAC and Australia Day. So what do you think he was talking about?

      • bogan*lol*

        See, encouraged to mouth off by the likes of reactionaries like you.Obviously I was talking about the ones with scant loyalty and didnt say “”they all have scant loyalty”.Amazing .

        ” Rodriguez says:
        May 12, 2010 at 10:46 am
        I wish we could do away with Australia Day and simmer down the convected grief and gratitude over Anzac day…We desperately need a day that includes all Australians. A national multicultural day would be pretty good I reckon.”

        No, he said simmer down, now you are even trying a little revisionism and STILL trying to explain his angle when you cant.He simply never said, hinted or implied ANYTHING about drinking.Speak for yourself.

        .

        • It seems quite obvious that he, like the rest of us, believes that the day is shrouded in faux mourning in some form of balancing respect, when most people look forward to these days simply because they represent mass piss ups.
          You were saying ‘tone down’, but let’s stick to the quote now. I agree that people should simmer down about the two events. Remember how furious everybody became when Ray Martin raised the flag debate on ANZAC Day? He received hundreds of death threats. Simmer the fuck down you fucking losers. It’s a democracy and there was no disrespect to the diggers whatsoever – in fact, none of them fought under the Australian flag anyway – they fought under the Union Jack.
          And of course you’ll remember the episodes on the most recent Australia Day… At multiple venues around Australia (the largest being in Manly), flag-draped drunken youths jumped on cars, yelled at non-whites, and carried on like ripe fuckheads, believing they were somehow entitled to act this way because they were Australian on Australia Day. And you will note how much anger and resentment rests with these people when they become aware of nationwide ‘Invasion Day’ festivals being held on Australia Day by Aboriginal rights groups – despite there being no anti-white sentiment associated at all during these events.
          If there were national holidays dedicated to acknowledging our Indigenous people or our cultural diversity, such division might not be felt. And don’t see this as an opportunity to say that non-whites don’t celebrate these occasions because they do. I used to be an executive at a high school with over 90% non-English speaking backgrounds, and the whole school was 100% behind both of these events.

    • “By your fucked up logic, new comers, often with scant loyalty to Australia beyond it’s economic system should strut around and be allowed to mouth off and denigrate our traditions and culture and demand we “simmer” it down a bit.”
      Not SHOULD, they are allowed to and there’s not a damn thing you can do about it. That’s why your logic (whereby YOU would like to believe YOU get the right to determine who can and can’t criticise Australia based on their ethnic heritage – such a sound intellectual argument, lol) is fucked up, racist, and illegal. I don’t need to address your racist and unfounded assumption that newcomers have scant loyalty to Australia as the antibogan has done so.

      • Yes, there is a lot that can be done about it and is.Ultimately Australians despise upstart lefties and their encouragement of new comers to be their mouth pieces by directing them to be upset or offended .In the end we do win because the numbers of immigrants has simply never got to the stage that the left ever wanted.BTW you seem to love to explain the law a LOT…maybe you are indicating your a government foot soldier who does way too much “dobbing” but in all honesty not one thing I’ve said here is illegal and in a court of law would be laughed out.Lucky Im married to a solicitor ‘ey?

    • “The abuse by officials thing is unrealated to anything discussed and is just your flourish.”
      It’s a little hard for you to understand, isn’t it. It’s absolutely related to the topic, which is in essence that you are calling for Australian citizens who are not white to shut up whenever there is something about Australia that they don’t like.

      • See, YOUR interpretation.I never said “non whites cant complain”.What I say goes for the white lefties and white newcomers just as readily.
        You seem to jump the gun and run off to conclusions a lot

        pfft

    • 1. I don’t think I’d touch your “traditions and culture” (or your warped version thereof) with a bargepole if you are representative of them.

      2. So you think we are going to be awestruck by your assertion that you are “married to a solicitor”? You are big on big-noting yourself aren’t you.

      I must say I have actually encountered one racist bigoted solicitor. Yes it was a woman. And apart from her gratuitous racist remarks entirely unrelated to the matter in hand, her written communication skills were so poor she had to redraft a set of simple probate documents entailing a routine inheritance of property while the clients were sitting in front of her.

      Stupidity and bigotry seem to be close companions. Fortunately they are rare amongst professionals.

  25. My idea of traditions ??

    Im not the one withe warped ideas that all Anglo people are capable of is bashing, inebriation and “exclusion”.Sadly it is obvious that those who inhabit these sites are the ones with the rather odd views on Anzac day and Australia day which are not shared by the majority.

    Considering how fast and loose people like you are with the words “racist” bigot” etc etc it has no impact. when it is coming from people like you if you saw anything as not being racist that would actually get my attention.I am on YOUR turf though and cliches and stereotypes are the order.Luckily only a very small minority comes here.Why ? Because the header “fuck off we’re full of racists” indicates straight off your alienation from the majority because of your own hatred.It also betrays your liberal use of the “f” bomb but seriously, noone should come here and expect anything more challenging than “fuck off ya bigot”.I was hoping for a challenge but it has been a big flop.

    “fuck off we’re full of racists” actually means”we are really fucking paranoid and see racists EVERYWHERE”

    • No, it’s just a turn around of ‘Fuck Off We’re Full’. That’s all. It pisses the FOWF types off to see it. Just like it pissed them off when Greeks and Italians turned wog around from being derogatory racism and used it to empower themselves in the same way as the American negroes used ‘nigger’.

      So if all this site does is call people racist when they aren’t, how come you’re not defending any of the posts, rather taking your offensive to the people commenting here? Are you an apologist for racism? Or do you simply believe that the content here is not racist?

    • Oh and P.S: This simple blog has nearly 50,000 hits in less than a month. That’s a lot of people looking at it and sharing it around, regardless of whether or not they’re leaving comments. And there’s plenty more material in the vault.

    • We’re not really interested in “debate” with racists. As far as we are concerned there is no debate to be had.Australia is a multicultural country. That is enshrined in law. More important than the statutes is a number of case law precedents which I won’t bother going into since I doubt if you’d understand them.

      Racists are losing any argument there is. The Internet has regrettably giving them a platform far outweighing their impact on the social fabric. But among their number are a group of psychologically and morally impaired individuals who represent a physical danger to the rights of others. Part of their impairment is their inability to realise that they are a fringe group who have no legitimate basis in the political life of this country. This site highlights that fact every single day with every single post. And along with their hysterical racism and bigotry comes the homophobia and sexism as close companions.

      Un-Australian? Indeed.

  26. Australian is a European outpost with over 90% of the population being “white”.We are not as multicultural as the media leads everyone to believe.Inner Melbourne & Sydney are not reflective of the whole of Australia.

    The “racists” are not losing.Look at ANY poll on refugees or immigration and every single time a lion share majority are against it in public polls.The majority is not a “fringe grouo” but the lefties and the “open borders” style pro immigrationers ARE the minority and a small one.

    • By “public polls” I guess you mean the ones run by the media (such as the Hun, your favourite newspaper) where people click on a button – where even these outlets have a disclaimer that these polls do not represent a properly conducted survey. Of course I wouldn’t expect you to actually source a result from a properly conducted and sourced poll, where you are going to find the results quite different to what you hope for.

      It’s too late for you to have the Blankestan you hope for. No one would want it anyway – what a dull and fearful alternative to an outward looking, exciting, sophisticated and tolerant society. Maybe we should call it Blandestan?

  27. council & government surveys, media run polls(so?)…unless democracy concerns you and people having the freedom to express their ideas is seen by you as the “tyranny of the majority”. Your problem is the source because it isnt green left weekly.”

    You think Australia which is made up of all Europe has to offer is “boring” ?? Is this why people spnd billions a year travelling to Europe ? There is nothing bland about Australia, I can give you a tip. The reality is that lefty’s in any western country always piss on and moan about their home country and the solutiuon in their eyes is “more immigrants”.Go ahead but all you do is create more and more underclasses, someone will be worse off and it wont be whiteman, never is.Despite endless invasions and colonisations we have stayed strong, prosperous and resilient.Others have fallen into shocking dissaray after just one invasion.

    So share your “properly sourced and conducted” polls that show a majority support for immigration ?

    • When my mother came here from England over 50 years ago the family came for the imagined better opportunities that a war-weary country could not offer. The same was true for the millions who came over from the rest of Europe at the same time, often from DP camps (we’d call them “refugee camps” now). Many were fleeing the tyranny of Stalinist Communism, traumatised by war, often survivors of concentration camps or former slave labourers. Sound familiar?

      What is the difference between them and the refugees and migrants who wish to come here now?

      When my mother came here Australia was overwhelmingly monocultural, dull and ruled by a paternalistic government who were quite happy to tug the forelock to an Empire whose time was gone, to be a backwater wedded to an imagined past and a quarry for the rest of the world. That has now changed, and Australia’s diverse human capital is the better for it.

      Don’t kid yourself either that the dominant culture welcomed European migrants with open arms. Your racists would have felt quite at home with the loud-mouths condemning “Poms”, “wogs”, “dagoes”, “reffos”, “Balts” and “Yids”, lurid headlines about Maltese “gangs” and attempts to portray any criminal of Italian origin as a Mafia member, jokes about the hygiene and accents of the British, descriptions of Mediterranean immigrants as “greasy” and “dirty”.

      One thing for sure, the loud-mouths haven’t changed. Just their targets.

      As for your demand that I do your research homework for you, my answer is I don’t want or need to. That you and the ignorant racists whose posts are featured here are totally out of step with the reality of Australia is patently obvious.

  28. Heres a tip…..demand a referendum on immigration.I personally would have no concerns with Australians going to a referendum on the issue.Would you ?

    • Here’s a tip:

      One in four people living in Australia is a first generation migrant.
      One in two people living in Australia is born of family that moved here from overseas within the past 50 years.

      Is the referendum open to these Australians?

  29. Explain “Australias diverse human capital is better for it”…what EXACTLY does that mean ?

    The reality is the “wops” “dago’s” “poms””yids” etc etc WANTED very much to be part of a whole and did everything possible to do so.They wanted to work .Within two generations many of them saw themselves as “Aussies” and did not whinge and complain.What we have now are people who have no desire or intention to adapt to the greater culture but hope to be apart from it, and this is fully encouraged by the advent of the “lefty”.Then the polocy of “multiculturalism” instead of integration.The left also encourage dissatisfaction with Australian culture and tradtions often going so far as to say it doesnt even exist!
    So far African refugees have contributed nothing to our economy and are already committing far higher rates of crime per head.This goes for many ehtnic groups including some Asian.

    No, you said there had been “properly” conducted polls that indicate a majority support for immigration and multiculturalism.I imagined they would be on hand but I also imagine you dont actually have such data because we both know it does not exist.I even googled polls and surveys on the issues and could not find anything but majority against.

    You want loudmouths ? Check out footage from Pauline Hanson meeting circa 1997 and check out the flying bricks, urine filled balloons, spitting & frothing anger and that was YOUR side! Funnily enough those going to hear her for themselves looked cool, calm and collected.

  30. “The reality is the “wops” “dago’s” “poms””yids” etc etc WANTED very much to be part of a whole”

    In the economic sense and in the sense that they wanted their children to take advantage of the educational opportunities available to them. But many times highly qualified doctors, scientists, lawyers and academics were forced to take menial jobs because the Anglo-centric establishment refused to recognise their qualifications and refused to allow them to retrain. And English classes were largely non-existent for most, particularly for women at home.

    This discrimination has been fortunately rectified only in recent times.

    Guess what Baggy, I’m Australian born, proficient in English and white and your definition of “culture” and the yobbo version which matches yours holds no interest for me.

    The data for support for immigration and multiculturalism exists, but I won’t waste my time doing your research for you because you would deny it anyway, and prefer the version which I see every time you have a thought bubble.

    Not interested in Pauline Hanson, failed politician, serial bigot and beneficiary of the Australian taxpayer thanks to the $200,000 + from the AEC she reaped from her last attempt at election. Yet another oxygen thief. Nick Griffin and she will make a good pair.

    • That is the problem, you define anything Anglo Australian as “yobbo”.
      I do not view Australians with such bigoted hatred or define them and their culture as “yoboo”.

      Im sure there is little about Anglo Australia that sits well with you.

  31. Let’s make it easy. I’ll tell you what Australian culture really is not from where I sit and you will then realise how far off the mark your version is.

    1. Australia is a nation of immigrants, their descendants and its Indigenous people.

    2. Indigenous Australians are the owners and custodians of the land. Despite years of being treated badly by many of the descendants of the newcomers they graciously permit us to share the land with them. We should respect their culture, find out from them which parts of it they wish to share and integrate these practices into Australian society as a whole.

    3. Immigrants and their descendants have given us common law and parliamentary democracy. Both of these traditions are not set in stone but are capable of being expanded and adapted to a changing society as they always have been. So Australia pioneered votes for women, free public education and an enlightened industrial relations system. Given the chance, Australia can absorb the best that both Indigenous practices and cultural traditions from its immigrants can give to the society as a whole.

    4. The rich and ancient cultures from other countries have given us a world-class cuisine, the wine industry and a competitive agricultural sector among other gifts. No longer do we dine exclusively off the poor copies of British working-men’s fare (which was never as good as the real thing anyway) So an Australian culture can potentially include for example, circle sentencing for offenders, elements of Islamic banking practice and a more compassionate and inclusive care for the elderly – all practices of non-Anglo cultures.

    5. Australia as a tolerant and liberal country will allow freedom of expression, freedom for adults to view, see and hear what they wish and freedom for individuals to express their sexuality. At the same time racism and bigotry should be as unthinkable as murder.

    6. Australia will emphasise the importance of the English language by ensuring every citizen who needs it has the means to easily access education in literacy and language. At the same time, as a multicultural and multi-ethnic country, all of its citizens should have access to education and to materials in a multitude of languages. Australia should not be one of the few monolingual countries in the world. Educated Europeans and Asians these days speak at least two languages fluently. So do our Indigenous people in a lot of cases.

  32. “Yes, there is a lot that can be done about it and is.”
    Sure there is. I remember mass movements in support of Banning Criticism of ANZAC Day But Only By Non-Whites…oh wait. no I don’t. Seeing as you’re married to a solicitor, why don’t you ask your partner what laws exist to stop migrants criticising ANZAC day? You’re so worked up about your culture supposedly being denigrated but the fact of the matter is that the only thing you can do about it is complain, using badly constructed arguments, on an anti-racist website… *chuckle*

    “You seem to jump the gun and run off to conclusions a lot”
    This is coming from the same hypocritical racism apologist who determines someone’s ties to Australia based on the name used to post a comment on the internet. When it comes to taking the moral high ground on jumping the gun and making assumptions, you lost all credibility with your first hissy fit to Rodriguez.

    “It also betrays your liberal use of the “f” bomb but seriously, noone should come here and expect anything more challenging than “fuck off ya bigot”
    LMAO, you’re upset at the use of the F word? I don’t know if you’ve noticed but racists (such as those exposed on this site) don’t seem to be able to communicate WITHOUT the liberal use of the F word. Don’t see you getting morally offended by that. But I’m not surprised given the sum of your argument thus far – “Anti-racists evil and bigoted, wah wah wah, Nazis and racists good and the majority of Australians, so there!”.

    “I think your abuse of the words racist and bigot is the only hysterical thing”
    So you’re suggesting the comments made by Australians (who you claim are in the majority) aren’t examples of hysterical racism – comments such as “I could kill every Sri Lankan at work for my 20th” (https://theantibogan.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/screen-shot-2010-05-10-at-6-06-32-am.png), or “let’s electrify the fences on Christmas Island and fry the buggers” (https://theantibogan.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/screen-shot-2010-05-06-at-10-09-27-pm.png). What are they, examples of calm racism? How many Australians do you know would stand by and support those comments? Do you support them, or condemn them?

    “That is the problem, you define anything Anglo Australian as “yobbo”.”
    No, you simply made that up (or assumed…again). The problem is you don’t read this website very well. From “What is a Bogan Today?”: The modern day bogan is not necessarily a white Australian, nor is it all white Australians.

  33. “In the end we do win because the numbers of immigrants has simply never got to the stage that the left ever wanted”
    This argument’s an epic fail, and you’re desperately clutching at straws. It’s not about right or left, anti-racists exist on both end of the political spectrum. We call you racist because you are. You call us lefties because your intellectual cup doesn’t extend to anything else, so you dismiss everything as a left wing conspiracy. BTW, don’t try to pretend that anti-racists want a particular level of immigration – that’s a tactic of the racists and the FOWF types. No anti-racist has ever declared “wanting” a certain number of immigrants but the APP and FOWF types DO demand that we take NO refugess. You might notice on this site how it’s pointed out that refugees are nowhere near the level claimed by the likes of you. In the end, you fail and fail miserably, because the number of refugees or immigrants you make a song and dance about is much less than your scaremongering would have us believe, and the number of immigrants you’d like to see – zero – will never take place. So nice try at misappropriating an argument that really doesn’t work in your favour. Fail, fail, fail.

    • the word racist doesnt impact on me, it is the ammunition you have and the only ammunition.When in doubt call people racist and hope like hell they recoil in horror.

      I know Im racist, big so what.

      I start sentences with “Im racist but….”

      • I know this is hard for you, but try and get it. You don’t say too much that would suggest that you’re racist, other than your lame attempts at finding a few news articles that illustrate random examples of ethnic crime. But you are a racism apologist. You have the opportunity to distance yourself from the hardcore racism that appears on this website, and you don’t. You excuse it. And that suggests very strongly that you are a racist. And perhaps you wear that badge with pride. But that’s how sad you are. That you hold yourself superior to people who weren’t lucky enough to be born here.

      • Try addressing the topic for once – you claim “the left” have wanted a certain number of immigrants. Evidence? Couldn’t care less whether the word racist affects you or not – we just call it as we see it.

  34. A person who says “I want to kill paki’s for my 20th” is not a racist but a psychopath, maybe sociopath.Bit of a difference.Why not report them ? Some people who say that are not always making idle threats.

      • hard for you to understand is he is simply clinging onto what he thinks society is freaked out by.Everytime you OVEREACT to even subtle anti immigration sentiment someone who wants to be seen as a rebel will say something like this to get a reaction, which people like you clearly give in spades

        • Most of the stuff on this site isn’t ‘anti-immigration’. It’s HARDCORE RACISM. Believing people of non-Anglo ethnicity are sub-human scum. Encouraging the idea of mass killing of non-Anglos. About 5% of the content of this website would be anti-immigration sentiment that could be justified thinking.

  35. ‘no wanting to kill pakis isn’t racism! It’s actually sociopathic!’ lmao the point is he doesn’t want to kill white people-I know you’re loathe to condemn racism but that’s a pretty pathetic attempt at justifying and excusing it. As for reporting it try reading this blog. The authors have stated they DO alert authorities to this racism.

  36. oh please, he just expresses a desire to kill.That is the issue, no matter who he is expressing it about. If he was saying this about whites or women or children it would have no traction with you.
    The problem is the express wish to kill not that he wishes to kill paki’s or anyone else, the problem is the fact he feels a need to declare such a wish at all.Wanting to kill someone or killing someone based on race doesnt make it more horrible than killing for any other senseless reason.

    • He features on this website because he is racist. You’re trying to draw the attention away from his racism by saying that he is purely a psychopath. We don’t approve of his desire to kill, but we are exposing his racism first and foremost.
      You have a plethora of racists on this website and you can choose to defend any of them. The fact that you don’t, indicates that you can’t. Having said that, you remain an apologist for the material shown on this website, and that makes you no better.

    • “oh please, he just expresses a desire to kill”
      Oh please, get a brain. He expresses a desire to kill specifically Sri Lankans on a racist website. He doesn’t want to kill people who are white. I don’t know whether you are genuinely wanting to excuse or deny racism, or whether you are just pretending to be stupid in order to divert the topic from your own failings when discussing other subjects.

  37. Do the authors alert authorities if a non white says ” I want to kill a bunch of whites at work today ” ?
    or “I want to rape and kill some women “? Does this have as much gravity to you ?

    • Would you care to give us some verifiable examples which are not fake? No didn’t think so. It’s you lot who are all about hate and violence with your pathetic little “Defence Leagues” and Pythonesque political parties like the AFP and APP.

      It is your mates who are featured here wanting to blow asylum seeker boats out of the water, “manning up” with (no doubt illegal) weapons, pretending to be concerned about the rights of Muslim women yet treating your own wives and girlfriends like pieces of meat.

      • so much hate and so little time.Needless to say a lot of stereotyping too and who are the Defence league, APP & AFP ?

        So this is simply a hate on whites site…is that your points ?

        hate is hate is hate….get out in the sunshine and suck it up

  38. “So this is simply a hate on whites site…is that your points ?”
    “hate whites and only focus on whites?”

    No, that’s an accusation you are making to detract from the lack of evidence in your replies. It also shows, once again, that you have failed to grasp the meaning of this website.

    Let me explain it in terms simple enough for you to understand. You asked,
    “Do the authors alert authorities if a non white says ” I want to kill a bunch of whites at work today ” ?”

    I suggested that you send in some screenshots (as did Josh, who asked you to present verifiable evidence of the type of comment you claim exists). I was calling your bluff, because I knew you wouldn’t be able to.

    Your intelligent reply?
    “do you say woof woof?”
    Just as I suspected. No, you couldn’t find any screenshots. Yes, you were just trying to detract from your lack of ability to make a coherent point. And Josh was right.
    “Would you care to give us some verifiable examples which are not fake? No didn’t think so.” Yet another fail, baggies.

    “So much hate and so little time”
    Not in your case. It’d be closer to “so much offence and so few brains”

  39. Sorry why why but all you have argued with since the start is insults and swearing.you are like an angry drunk.I barely read a thing you say, like thsi post..

    • You’ve got nothing, Bill. You haven’t got the intelligence to respond to anyone. It’s pathetic. The amount of times you’ve brought out the box of tissues because of the ‘anger’ or ‘aggression’ or the ‘language used’ by someone arguing with you… What are you? 12 years old?

      We’ll soon start editing your pointless replies in an attempt to make you more entertaining if nothing else. It made our previous serial troll leave.

    • And all you’ve got to argue with is a constant need to use red herrings and straw men. Once again, you create this false sense of moral superiority by changing the topic to how bad it is to swear and use insults, but never once realising that your condemnation rings hollow because you have never distanced yourself from any of the myriad examples of violent and often illegal breaches of racial discrimination laws found on this site, and you have never condemned vile, racist comments (most of the time using swear words). Even worse you make piss-weak attempts at justifying and excusing comments expressing a desire to engage in homicide against a specific racial group as “anti-immigration” and “just sociopathic, not racist”. Once again, you don’t get worked up and hot under the collar when racists swear – only when people who dismantle your arguments do.

    • “I barely read a thing you say, like thsi post..”
      That’s obvious by the fact that you can’t respond in any coherent manner to the rebuttal of your point.

      “what about racism against white people, do the site authors report that?”
      “can you send any proof of that racism against white people? how about some screenshots?”
      “let’s change the topic! you say woof woof! oh and stop insulting me! boo hoo!”

  40. Ah fuck you all, the simple fact of the matter is that multiculturalism will never work, it has failed in past and is failing again. Certain ethnic and religious groups will never mix. Muslims want to take over the world and slowly but surely they are getting their way, and narrow minded fuckwits like ‘The Antibogan’ gang are prepared to sit back and let it happen. Why Why, woof woof to you, you maggot. Go and do something constructive and give someone a headjob.

    • I heard Muslims mix well with the Sikhs. I also heard in some more liberal Middle Eastern nations like Bahrain and Qatar, Muslims, Maronites and others mix well. Argument ruined, go bake yourself in an oven.

    • “Why Why, woof woof to you, you maggot. Go and do something constructive and give someone a headjob.”
      My, with such intellectual and persuasive arguments you’ve convinced us all of the superiority of your views.

  41. The lesson here is really this, multiculturalism breeds racism. Why can’t you guys get a grip. Lets look a Haiti, with out white aid dollars and white mans intervention there would have been typical nigger behaviour, like looting. They would have just run amok until armageddon. Blacks are to stupid to build, rescue, manage disasters, its always whites money and technology to help em. Useless bunch of cunts.

    • Yes, cheesy, we all know multiculturalism breeds racism…… amongst the intolerant rednecks. Oh by the way, you think you feel big by saying something to the contrary of general opinion to make you feel like a maverick- only on the internet, in real life I bet you shut your dirty mouth faster than a formula one.

      Haiti was ruined by the regime of Papa Doc, which had Western backing, and prior to that, French colonialization which stripped everything and shipped it back to France- that’s why many post-colonial societies remain impoverished. Blacks can build cities very well. The ancient Songhay Empire has proven this. Look it up on Wikipedia. If not the Kingdom of Abyssinia, who successfully…. wait for it….. defeated the Italians in three separate battles. If you’re talking about Caribbeans, look at Jamaica.

      Yes, western governments provide aid money to these impoverished nations. Stabilising them to First/Second World standard will be to the benefit of all.

  42. This debate is interesting, but also now a bit boring. I could get worked up about this but I won’t, there’s no point. I’d just like to suggest that “Parmesan Pete” should be the one confused and obviously pathetic microbe we all target. Have you even read some of his garbled comments?

What do YOU think about this?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s