Would you house an asylum seeker in your home for $300 a week?

Asylum seeker 1

Along come the Pathetics to add their two cents’ worth

APP asylum

And even the Tanty Bogans are prepared to put aside their malign hatred of asylum seekers if there’s a dollar to be extracted from taxpayers and charitable organisations – not to mention some cheap labour to exploit.

Asylum seeker 2

And not only are the Tanties in full bellow, the Burqapede has also managed to grind out some piss-poor poetry – no doubt hoping for a financial literary spinoff.

Centipedia

We won’t bore you with the whole turgid rant. However the dirty bedsheet set were fulsome in their praise along with much exchange of e-fluids followed by the usual bogot chow-down. Riveting stuff.

Burqapedia

Never get between a bogot and a fistful of dollars

149 thoughts on “Would you house an asylum seeker in your home for $300 a week?

  1. Geez, Assylum seekers as slave labour for $300per week to the homeowner (Need to double check that), this isn’t a game of limbo, the objective isn’t to see how low one can go! Reminds me of that scene from Schindler’s list where the officer is explaining that the pay goes to the SS guard for each Jew, skilled was double the price of unskilled… I have no idea what to say about all that, I really don’t.

      • I can see the similarities, but somehow I doubt that these people would actually get off their backsides to do something like that. The power of the keyboard means one can supposedly say so much that would never seep from the tongue, let alone actions.

  2. For $300 a week I might….MIGHT…..consider housing a Bogan but I would be afraid that their hate-fuelled stupidity would infect my children.

  3. i hate to tell the morons this but the govt have already been housing the youth tht arrived without adult family in youth services already… thts why they wanna try this coz its worked with the youth assylum seekers for over 12 months…

  4. It’s almost funny to see how bitter and twisted they are. It’s kind of nice to think that, with all the hatred they spew out, they infect their own little bubble the most.

    I can’t imagine a life spent walking around thinking nasty thoughts about every person in the street, or on TV, or in the news, who doesn’t think/look/talk like me. It must be such a miserable fucking existence.

    It must also be tough to be that thick that you don’t realise that the money you’d receive would be largely used to feed and house people – it’s not a cash payment for service. It’s beyond the bogots’ mental capacity to understand that some people do things because they want to help other people and because they want to do something good for a fellow human being.

    Sometimes the bogots make me angry, but a lot of the time I just feel complete and utter pity for how pathetic their lives must be.

  5. I wonder if a similar program were introduced offering cash incentives to house homeless Australia citizens, whether this lot would react the same. My thoughts are they wouldn’t put their hands up to help anyone but themselves, the selfish, hateful attitude they perpetuate…

    • They always bleat about the homeless when they’re trying to argue against taking in asylum seekers. I would put good money down on a bet that if the asylum seekers all stopped coming tomorrow, and the ones who had arrived here in, say, the last few years packed up and went elsewhere… they would campaign for a tax break or higher child benefits or something before they would ever speak of spending money on the homeless.

      I also once floated the idea that if they’re so concerned about the homeless, how would they feel about an additional tax to ensure housing for all homeless people? You can guarantee that if you tried to introduce such a thing, the majority of the bogots would start up on the homeless, telling them to stop being bludgers and stealing their Hard Earned Tax Dollars and get a job, etc etc.

      They’re full of shit, they don’t want to help anyone. They just try to validate their hatred by hitching it to a good cause.

    • Why should they accommodate Muslim boatpeople?

      It was the left & far left that has created this problem. The ALP had a solution that worked, they dismantled this solution & created a problem.

      You lot created a problem, now the bogans are selfish’, because they dont want to help you fix your mess? You fuckwits.

      Perhaps you’d like to iterate what your solution is to the current problem? The only thing the Australian people are seeing is a softer & softer approach & the subsequent arrival of more & more boats. You lot never had a solution, in fact the more Muslims & more boats the happier you’ll be.

      The abolition of the pacific solution by Gillard & her ‘Green’ bedfellows created this problem, and this goes to show just how desperate Bowen & Gillard are. It will only be a matter of time before there are rapes if this madness is implemented.

      • “The ALP had a solution that worked, they dismantled this solution & created a problem. ”

        What solution was that Grant? The solution that resulted in a super-expensive transportation to island nations, bribery of said island nations, and increased costs per asylum seeker due to health concerns, mental health damages, and time off work due to these above health complaints? This is your solution, of which asylum seekers ended up in Australia anyway?

        So, just so we’re all clear here, Grantsurbator, your solution is costly, more damagin, doesn’t change the result, and can only be said to result in lower asylum seeker numbers if you are actually believing that the policies of Australia somehow also lead to a decline in asylum seeker numbers world wide. Is that what you think?

        “It will only be a matter of time before there are rapes if this madness is implemented.”

        Prove your allegations. What is your proof that asylum seekers are more likely to be rapists than australian born citizens?

        • The solution, dunce, was that the boats were reduced to negligible numbers, like about 3 a year instead of 5 or six a week.
          .
          The boats were stopped, after this, Naura was gradually emptied out. Then next to no boats- problem solved.

          But you, with your immagined moral superiority and your ‘we know better’ stance, sought to kiss foreign ass, oh dothz poor widdle tings.

          Well pal, the party will soon be over.

          Your claim ‘ they ended up in Australiá anyway’ is the usual bullshit answer we hear from the open borders brigade.

          Did, or did not, the boats stop with the implementation of the pacific solutuion?

          “Prove your allegations. What is your proof that asylum seekers are more likely to be rapists than australian born citizens?”

          I seem to recall the case of an asylum shopper that molested a schoolgirl at a Darwin municiple pool. But thats perfectly OK with you eh? Just business as usual?

        • Funny how you lot “seem to recall” cases yet offer no evidence.

          Funny how you lot seem to have minds like flypaper the minute you get the (often erroneous) scent that an offender is not a standard white man yet are totally oblivious to the far greater number of crimes committed by white men. Example below.

          Funny how you were spluttering with confected indignation when you thought the Oslo bombings and the Utoya massacre were committed by ‘teh_mooslems” yet suddenly became totally silent when it turned out to be a lone white neo-Nazi. Then you even ventured out of your holes long enough to say things like “what he did was stupid (stupid???) but we can understand why because he was angry at the high level of immigration blah blah blah” or words to that effect.

        • I suspect that your average bogan has no idea how much of their “hard earned” tax dollars are spent holding people in offshore processing centres. It would also be hard for them to grasp the fact that 100% of the $300 given to families who support refugees is then spent back in the community and local economy. The benefits of this kind of scheme go way beyond being able to make $300 for giving someone a bed, but again that is way outside the scope of the bogan brain.

          I for one would like to see my hard earned tax dollars being re-invested back into our local economy rather than benefitting corrupt officials overseas or the large multi-national companies that administer detention centres here in Australia.

        • “The solution, dunce, was that the boats were reduced to negligible numbers, like about 3 a year instead of 5 or six a week.”

          Yes, it was a termendously succesful scheme-if you ignore the worldwide drop in asylum seeker numbers. Or are you telling us, Grant, that the policy of one country, that no other coutnry adopted, lead to a world wide drop of asylum seeker numbers? Is that right?
          .
          “Then next to no boats- problem solved. ”

          Except now you had a population of refugees that were mentally ill, and unable to work due to their time in detention. What’s your proposition for them, Grant? Coem on, you think it’s a winning system, so what do you do with the refugees who, thanks to your policies, are unable to work, and require significant mental health support?

          “Your claim ‘ they ended up in Australiá anyway’ is the usual bullshit answer we hear from the open borders brigade.

          Did, or did not, the boats stop with the implementation of the pacific solutuion?”

          No, they didn’t. They dropped, the numbers dropped significantly. But they still came-you’ve said so yourself. And they dropped worldwide. Are you telling us, Grant, that Australia’s policy to asylum seekers lead to a reduction of asylum seekers to Canada? Is that what you actually believe?

          “Prove your allegations. What is your proof that asylum seekers are more likely to be rapists than australian born citizens?”

          “I seem to recall the case of an asylum shopper that molested a schoolgirl at a Darwin municiple pool.”

          I ask for proof that asylum seekers are more likely to be a rapist than Australian born citizens. You respond with “I seem to recall”, then describe one case.

          So…one person is a representation of a whole, are they, Grant? One person, with no source mentioned at all, just a bigot’s failing biased memory, is proof that an entire population of people are rapists.

          Well, if that’s the case, step back because I’m going to blow your mind, Grant. Because I have, according to your logic, absolute proof that people who have “Grant” in their name are more likely to be rapists than people not called Grant.

          My proof:
          http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/rapist-paroled-with-no-tracker/story-e6freoof-1226237826732
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delroy_Easton_Grant

          That’s right-2 rapists, serial rapists no less. Each with sources.

          Grant, if you were convinced by one case of a half remembered news story of a molestation that all asylum seekers are rapists, then you must also be convinced by my TWO cases of SERIAL rapists, that people who have Grant in their name, including you, are more likely to be rapists than people who are not called Grant.

          I invite you to either challenge my assertion, without destroying your own argument; accept that you’ve got no evidence that asylum seekers are any more likely to eb rapists than Australian born citizens, or (And this is my favourite), go to yuor polcie station and tell the police officers “I’ve just found out I’m more likely to be a rapist-I better be locked up immeidatly!”

      • The Pacific Solution cost $500,000 per asylum seeker, and all but a handful of the people detained during that time were allowed into Australia anyway, after it costing all that money.

        When Labor replaced the Pacific Solution it coincided with a severe increase worldwide in people seeking asylum. Conversely, when the Pacific Solution was introduced, there was a worldwide drop in refugees seeking asylum. There is no actual proof that the Pacific Solution stopped people coming. And there is little difference to the net result these days. Asylum seekers are still detained for an unreasonably long amount of time, at a cost to the taxpayer, and then they are granted refugee status and they come to Australia anyway. It’s a monumental cost and effort to detain people, with little or no benefit. Which is why other countries don’t do it.

        You’ve also completely avoided the subject of whether you would champion the idea of doing a similar scheme for the homeless. Would you take a homeless person into your home if you were given $130 a week to house them? Or is it okay to bleat about the homeless to try to stir up hatred towards asylum seekers/refugees, without actually pulling your finger out of your arse and doing anything for the homeless regardless?

        • I would take neither. However if Australia cannot handles its own homeless we don’t want Muslims here to exacerbate Australia’s social problems..

          $500,000 a year? where are these figures from?

        • So rant, speaking as a member of the APP, how do you propose helping the homeless? I look forward to your response.

        • “I would take neither.”

          So were you born a selfish, hypocritical prick or did something make you grow into one?

          “However if Australia cannot handles its own homeless we don’t want Muslims here to exacerbate Australia’s social problems..”

          There are far more issues with the homeless than there just not being space to put them. In many cases there are shelters for homeless people to stay in, but there is a curfew and they can’t use alcohol or drugs if they want to stay there. For some, they’d rather not comply with those rules so they don’t stay in the accommodation. That’s not the fault of asylum seekers.

          How do Muslims, overall, affect social problems in Australia in an adverse way? Do you have any information to back that up? Do you even have any information that relates to rates of certain crimes amidst that demographic compared to other demographics? Or are you just pulling it out of your arse as usual?

          “$500,000 a year? where are these figures from?”

          Since you have such an inherent inability to research, here you go:

          “it cost more than $500,000 per person to process fewer than 1700 asylum seekers in Nauru, Manus and Christmas Island. By comparison, the cost of holding asylum seekers in a mainland centre, based on Department of Immigration estimates, was 3.5 per cent of the running costs of the Pacific solution.

          “The report found it cost $1830 a day to keep someone on Christmas Island compared with $238 a day at Sydney’s Villawood detention centre.

          “In calculating the $1 billion cost, the authors included navy interception, detention centre infrastructure and running costs, aid packages to Pacific governments, transport and health services.”

          http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/pacific-solution-cost-1b/2007/08/24/1187462523594.html

        • Grant’s stupidity is highlighted by the fact that he uses the terms “Muslim” and “Asylum Seeker” interchangeably. It just shows that he’s a paranoid xenophobe.

      • Excuse me? The left are the reason there are asylum seekers fleeing their countries??

        In 2008-2009, most offshore visas were given to asylum seekers from -

        Iraq (2874) – right wing politicians took a ‘war on terror’ there after acting on non-evidence suggesting there were WMDs that would aid enemies in the Middle East. They were wrong, and now over 134,000 people have died there.

        Burma (2412), – in 1962 the democratic government was overthrown and has been ruled ever since by a despotically junta. These guys have systematically raped and tortured those who have called for the return of democracy. They have displaced 1.3 million people, conscripted people into forced labor and extorted the public for example most recently quadrupling the gas prices. Left wing policies? I think not.

        Afghanistan (847), – right wing politicians decided that because a handful of nutjobs caused terror in the USA they would start a war there and thus stop factions of Islamic fundamentalists from hating the West. Logic error by right wingers.

        Sudan (631), – al-Bashir, who is wanted by the ICC on 10 counts of war crime, is instating Sharia Law in the north, UN Forces are being withdrawn, civil war is imminent and over 40% remain in poverty. A left wing dictator in Sudan? Me thinks not.

        Bhutan (616), – a constitutional monarch has introduced ethnic cleansing, and is expelling one fifth of the country’s population. Left wing policy? Nosireebob.

        Ethiopia (478), – people are fleeing this country because of persecution, unrest and famine, and borders of Somalia are controlled by Islamist rebels. Yes, this is the second example of asylum seekers who are fleeing Islamist radicals out of fear.

        Congo DRC (463), – Enyele militia have installed a process of ethnic devaluation and cleansing. Left wing policy?

        Somalia (456), – war, famine, dictatorship led persecution and thousands of murders and rapes. Yes, people are FLEEING this, not bringing it.

    • I’ve asked many of these far right, hate all asylum seekers gangs that if they care abotu the homeless I can name a charity in their state that would be very eager to have a donation of their time, or money, or any other type of aid, to support the homeless. I say state because I don’t want any of them thinking I’m prying for information on where they live, and I keep theo ptions open so those that cannot donate their money (such as myself), can donate their time (And I do!).

      It’s been over a year now, I’ve been making this offer over and over again and again. I have had a grand total of 0 people who have taken me up on my offer.

      Similarly I’ve had someone complaining about asylum seekers and immigrants stopping her from gettign a job. I found her a job-a tough job, but a job that can pay well, and she then told me she didn’t want to work and preferred to spend all her time studying. Funny that.

      • I’ve asked many of these far left, hate all Australians gangs if they care about the immigrants they can share their own homes with them.
        It’s been over a year now, I’ve been making this offer over and over again and again. I have had a grand total of 0 people who have taken me up on my offer.
        It is a bit sad when the left and right of politics conspire to impoverish Australians, under the guise of ‘sustainable living’ and ‘economic growth’. Australian children have no future.

        • “Patriot”-don’t parrot me. You didn’t offer, and it’s already apparent that asylum seekers are being picked up in the community. You know how I know? Because, as other comments are stating, there are plenty of people picking up asylum seekers since the offer began. There has been a rush of people to accept asylum seekers in the community.

          Where is the rush of APP members helping out the homeless? Where?

          “Australian children have no future.”

          Wow-for a patriot, you really have no hope in your country. Why don’t you leave?

        • Unlike immigrants and their kids, I do not have the privilege of ‘dual’ citizenship so could not leave even if I wanted to.
          If any of you cared about homelessness in this country, you would not be pushing mass immigration.
          Australian housing and living costs are among the highest in the world thanks to the highest rate of immigration in the world, pushed by both sides of politics against the will and interests of the majority of Australians. Australians will take this country back from the elites.

        • So Patriot, is it all immigrants you object to or just brown ones fleeing war and persecution?
          I’m just curious because as a law-abiding immigrant who has probably paid more tax in the last 6 years than you will pay in a lifetime, I do wonder how the country would fare if all us immigrants were made to leave, and took our skills and trades and economic inputwith us, if we didn’t agree to give up our dual citizenship.
          Not that I have dual citizenship, I’m merely a permanent resident. By choice, might I add. I couldn’t think of anything worse than CHOOSING to be a citizen of the same country as people like you and Grunt at the expense of my Irish citizenship and the right to travel freely around most of the world.

        • “If any of you cared about homelessness in this country, you would not be pushing mass immigration.”

          Except that every singly housing agency in Australia knows that house prices and rental prices are NOT the main reason for homelessness. Think about it, if you lost your house, would you be ending up on the street? I wouldn’t-I’ve got family, friends and many other colleagues that could and would help me out.

          But go ahead with your solution. Keep on blaming anyone who’s brown for causing problems, see where that gets you. But pray tell, what exactly have YOU done to help the homeless? What exactly have YOU done to help a homeless person find accommodation? Because “Yelling about how terrible brown people are” is not very helpful at all for the homeless person. They’d prefer a blanket.

          “Unlike immigrants and their kids, I do not have the privilege of ‘dual’ citizenship so could not leave even if I wanted to.”

          Yeah-screw the British with their evil dual citizenship, right? By the way, you can leave the country if you hate it so much, without needing dual citizenship. It’s a thing called “Immigration”-you find work overseas, apply for a work visa, see where it gets you. IF you really have no hope for your country, this seems like a very attractive option for you.

          “highest rate of immigration in the world, pushed by both sides of politics against the will and interests of the majority of Australians. Australians will take this country back from the elites.”

          Please please please provide us with evidence of the majority of Australians opposing immigration. You’ve said that a majority of Australians oppose it-so please present us the proof of this.

          Please say in your answer why:
          A) Repeated studies have shown majority of Australians supporting multiculturalism (http://www.minister.immi.gov.au/parlsec/media/media-releases/2009/lf09044.htm, http://www.sbs.com.au/aboutus/corporate/view/id/107/h/Living-Diversity)
          B) All anti-immigration parties have failed to score more than 9% of the national vote (Any most score less than 1%).

          I await your answer and/or ignorance.

  6. $300 a week?

    Well, now’s your chance, do-gooders.

    Take a sex starved single muslim neandathal, who thinks anything not wrapped up like a kewpie doll ‘wants it’ LOL.

    I wonder how many blow hards here will take up the offer?

    Any of you that have daughters?, LOL, good luck.

    Better shot down to Bunnings for some locking door handles.

    Oh, and pop down to Bankstown & pick up some hijabs for your wives ( we wouldn’t want them to loose their minds would we?) It’ll make them feel really at home until they pick up with the local jihad network.

    • It’s $130 a week per asylum seeker, which is meant to cover the cost of having extra people living in your house.

      No surprises you’re too thick to have actually read enough about it to know that.

      People have been signing up, Grant. The network had 200 new applicants within the first day. And we’ll see how successful it becomes, and then hopefully the tide will turn and it will be seen that community processing is the way to go.

      It’s a change for the better. And the icing on the cake is that it annoys the likes of you so much… :-)

      • Let them sign up, i’ll be waiting for coming news of the rapes.

        $130.00 a week ( if that figure is correct) would be flat chat covering the costs, not to mention the inconvenience.

        Gillards boat people BS is political poison. it suits me down to the ground. This will merely worsen her electoral annihilation.

        Perfect.

        Will you be taking one? LOL

        • Grant, naturally you’ll have plenty of evidence that asylum seekers are in anyway more likely to rape soemone than Australian born citizen? Or are you just making up stuff again?

          And I love it when APP members talk about how badly Labour is going to lose, for two reasons:
          1)- Labour wins some elections, loses some elections. APP has won nothing.
          2)- The APP actually thinks it’s competing with the LAbour party for votes. I know, crazy right? They actually think that all their complaining about :abour is doomed” will lead to people voting for the APP, when in reality, we all know there’s a much larger, much more popular party for conservatives who hate Labour. It’s called the Liberal party.

        • Evidence to suggest that asylum seekers are more likely to commit rape?

          The evidence already exists that in the majority of rape cases, the rapist is known to the victim. Asylum seekers generally don’t know anyone when they get here, so statistically they are least likely to be committing rape.

    • Grant-have you actually ever found a “local jihad” network? Ever actually found proof of anyone? I’m wondering, do you think you can name more Muslims in Australia that call for terrorist acts, or the violent overthrow of the government than I can APP members? Let’s see you try, okay?

      And I’ll get to ALL the questions you’ve ignored previously at a later stage, but here’s a classic to start you off:

      Grant, can you say, for once and for all, on what basis do you believe the majority of Australians oppose Multiculturalism? Say it for once and for all. All you’ve done about it, despite being asked many many many times is say “I don’t believe any study that tells me different” (Even when confronted with poor showing by anti-immigration parties at every single election). So finally, let us all know, what proof do you have that australia as a whole is behind you, and that you’re not just a crazy loner?

      • (Even when confronted with poor showing by anti-immigration parties at every single election).

        A bit like the poor showing for the Greens at the QLD polls. Ha hah ha.

        “we all know there’s a much larger, much more popular party for conservatives who hate Labour. It’s called the Liberal party.”

        Better than the ALP & Green alliance though eh pal?

        • Still not answering the question Grant. shall we go again:

          Grant, can you say, for once and for all, on what basis do you believe the majority of Australians oppose Multiculturalism?
          So finally, let us all know, what proof do you have that australia as a whole is behind you, and that you’re not just a crazy loner?

          Grant-have you actually ever found a “local jihad” network? Ever actually found proof of anyone? I’m wondering, do you think you can name more Muslims in Australia that call for terrorist acts, or the violent overthrow of the government than I can APP members? Let’s see you try, okay?

          And now, your new comments (Wonderful blinkers you must have, by the way, to avoid seeing 98% of what you read).

          “A bit like the poor showing for the Greens at the QLD polls. Ha hah ha.”

          Greens had a bad show. True. APP didn’t even show up!
          And there is a bit of a different between the Green’s poor showing at the QLD polls, and the continued dissapointment of the APP. The Greens have had a lot of good elections recently, especially federally. The APP has never had a good election ever. Can you spot the difference?

          “Better than the ALP & Green alliance though eh pal?”

          Not for you, though, Grant. If you ever want the APP to win-you don’t need people to run to the Liberal party, you need them to run to the APP. That’s right, isn’t it? Otherwise, how will the APP ever succeed in any election ever?

          Or have you come to realise that the APP will never win in any election ever? Are you just following the party not because you think they’ll win, but instead because you are very lonely?

    • I’ve already applied, and I’ve stated (many times in the past, and again now) that I would do it free of charge.

      P.S – Not all asylum seekers are Muslims. Can you see the Catch 22 you dig yourself into each time you talk? If Muslim men are supposedly all about just going about raping whoever they want, and Muslim women are supposedly all about just going about blowing people up – why are they risking their lives to come here? Surely they aren’t fleeing wars and persecutions or any other silly made-up reasons.

        • So, Patriot, someone has applied to host one, but because they haven’t hosted one AT THIS PRECISE SECOND, then they must be talking bullshit, right?

          Do you apply this to all discussions at this time? You ask someone what they’re having for dinner, they say Pizza, do you respond:

          “How many slices of pizza have you had for dinner until now. ZERO!”

          You must be fun to be around.

        • Dude has had plenty of time to host refugees before pretending to apply for this scheme.

      • Easy to say when you’re operating under a secret id. So we can easily dismiss this as the run-of-the-mill bullshit available here. So, would you house a homeless white Australian? I think not

        • So Lloydy, Patriot and Grant operating under a secret id, would you house a homeless white Australian, even those living on the streets, they might not be used to living in a house? I think not. But the question is, would they want to live with someone like you and your fellow APP?

      • Why are they coming here pal?

        Lets see, they could apply to stay in racist Muslim Malaysia, but don’t. Why? The Malays don’t want them, & even if they did, there ain’t no Centrelink in Malaysia, right pal?

        Or, they could apply to stay in indonesia, same scenario.

        They come here because Australia is full of Muslim arse kissers like you mate, plus the centrelink.

        • “Lets see, they could apply to stay in racist Muslim Malaysia, but don’t. Why? The Malays don’t want them, & even if they did, there ain’t no Centrelink in Malaysia, right pal?”

          Could it be because they have no right to work in Malaysia, and face the constant threat of forced deportation? Could that be it?

          Tell me Grant, how exactly you could settle and live in a new country if you are constantly at risk of deportation, and cannot work legally? How would you do it?

          “Or, they could apply to stay in indonesia, same scenario.”

          On there we agree (At last). In Indonesia it’s the exact same scenario-cannot work legally, at constant risk of deportation-how does someone settle there?

  7. $140 each Cara. It’s $130 each if you have a breeding pair. Shit. What a fantastic idea ! I’ll take as many as they can supply. Set them up in big sheds like battery pigs. This is a damn good money spinner if I ever saw one. Where do I sign ?l

  8. Is it true that those who raped and mutilated Anita Cobby were Muslims? Ah no they were inbred feral bogan vermin who must be sterilised along with all the other bogan filth that pollute this country.

      • So on straya day when boglans everywhere sing the national anthem, what do they think the line “for those who’ve come across the seas we’ve boundless plains to share” means?

    • “Is it true that those who raped and mutilated Anita Cobby were Muslims? Ah no they were inbred feral bogan vermin who must be sterilised along with all the other bogan filth that pollute this country.”

      So TAB, you allow this racist hate speech on your blog right? How then are you any different to the ‘racists’ that you are trying to expose? And with a name like Farrakhan , is this one of your Muslim buddies?

      • “So TAB, you allow this racist hate speech on your blog right? ”

        Grant, are you telling us that “bogan” is a race now? Or is it a religion? A particular bogan culture?

    • Please specify bogan filth and how you perceive yourself as above it Farrakhan? What glorious esteem you must hold yourself in. Pray tell, are you smug? do you sneer down at lesser beings every day? What an upstanding and righteous citizen you must be. you must be a real gem

  9. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/taxi-driver-i-trusted-raped-me/story-e6frezz0-1111117512555

    Muslim taxi driver rapists. note: The moronic attempt by journalist fuckwits to disguise the rapists background ‘Md’ instead of muhammed.

    “When he raped me, he didn’t use a condom. Afterwards, he took off his shirt and wiped me down. Before I even got out of the cab, I called triple-0 on my mobile. It was a shock to hear that call when they played it in the courtroom – I was just so panicked and frightened”

    Charming.

      • Grant, are you proud when a member of the APP celebrates the murder of children?

        I mean, all of us here hate rape. You seem to be okay with it when a white person does it-but we all hate rape. None of us belong to pro-rape political parties, or groups, and we all support the jailing of people who rape-right?

        But when it comes to child killing, our opinions differ. Some of us (You!) belong to a party that celebrates the murder of children. Some of us (You again), belong to a party that supports the murder of children if that helps them achieve their goal. Some of us (Yep, it’s you once more), belong to a political party that celebrates people who murder children and think they should be brought to Australia as heroes.

        Does that make you proud? Proud to belong to a group that actually thinks the murder of children is justified? Do you share this belief?

        Let’s make it clear once and for all Grant, tell us whether or not you support the murder of children? If you don’t, then why are you not condemning any members who support the murder of children? Or is it a case that you don’t mind a bit of child murder, as long as the killers do it while hating brown people?

      • It doesn’t mention that they are muslim because that wouldn’t be politically correct would it?

        As I have already illustrated the media turds tried to disguise the Muslim background of one rapists by using the name Md instead of muhammed.

        • Two of the three have Sikh names (that’s not Muslim if you’re interested).

          So you’re happy with non-Muslim “asylum shoppers”?

        • Ah, so you don’t have any evidence because of a vast media conspiracy, right? So what do you have to support your claim that the majority of asylum seekers will be rapists?

    • Grant, you’ve yet to respond to my logical deduction that people who have Grant in their names arem ore likely to be serial rapists.

      But good on you for finding some sources-even thoguh none of them actually prove asylum seekers are more likely to be rapists than Australian born citizens, seeing that:

      A)-None of the articles even mention the words “asylum seekers” (By the way, at least two of the articles described alleged perpertrators are extremely unlikely to be Muslim-they’re Sikh which you would realise if you actually knew shit about shit. Their surnames are Singh for crying out loud! And while I’m not saying it’s impossible to have Sihk asylum seekers, I have met over a hundred asylum seekers, christians, buddhists and muslims, and yet have never met a Sikh one).

      B)-5 people is not a good representation of a population of thousands. If you disagree, then tell me, how many crimes would it take committed by white people, to have all white men arrested as rapists. I’ve already found two with Grant in their names).

      So your grand proof that asylum seekers are more likely to rape anyone is 5 separate cases, one without sources and half remembered, and none actually stating that the alleged perpetrator was an asylum seeker.

      Cool, so if that’s the sort of evidence you need to prove your theory, let’s see if I can find more evidence to my “People who have grant in their name are more likely to be rapist”

      Now, boys and girls, as Grant has shown, you don’t need to fidn statistics of crime amogn asylum seekers, or people called Grant, you now don’t even need to find specific cases of crimes committed by asylum seekers, or people called Grant. Instead, you need to only find people who might be asylum seekers, even if they’re not, or people who might be called Grant, even if they’re not.

      Shall I go on, Grant, or should I give you time to further dig your own whole?

    • So I can understand you better, Grant, can you confirm the following understanding:

      Asylum seeker = Muslim = Taxi Driver = Rapist.

      • As I said previously, good luck to the numbskulls that take muslims in. There will be rapes. that is guaranteed.

        • Guaranteed! Based on your theory that “All Muslims, even the ones that are Sikhs, and therefore not Muslims are rapists”-is that correct?

          Well, Grant, if you’re so sure, how about you put your money where your mouth is? If you, a year following this decision, fail to find proof that asylum seekers committed more rapes than those in the community, you should quit the APP forever, and cut all ties to those members. In turn, if you do find absolute proof that the percentage of asylum seekers committing rapes in a year is larger than the percentage of australian born citizens committing rapes-I will gladly quit this site andn ever have any contact with any member again.

          Seems fair. So will you take me up on my bet Grant, or do you realise either A) you’ld fail, or b) you are a living embodiment of chicken shit?

    • I’d lvoe to Grant, but I live in a one bedroom apartment. Instead I help asylum seekers one day a week in accessing housing, so I think I’ve done my part.

      Now how are you or the APP helping the homeless? Looking forward to your answer.

  10. http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2005/07/21/1121539094208.html

    Pakistani Muslim rapists:

    “Yesterday, more than three years after they went on a six-month rampage, luring girls as young as 13 to their home in Ashfield to rape them, suppression orders forbidding publication of their trial details were lifted.

    They still cannot be named because two of the brothers were juveniles, aged 16 and 17, when they committed the first offences. But the crimes of the brothers MSK, MAK, MRK and MMK, and their friend RS, can now be made public.

    The brothers, who came to Australia from Pakistan around 2000, had claimed in the face of damning DNA evidence that they were the victims of an anti-Muslim conspiracy.”

    Real charmers eh? as young as thirteen? but who could blame them eh? Only following the example of the ‘prophet’. Right?

    • Where does it state they are asylum seekers, Grant? You’re the oen saying that the majority of asylum seekers are rapists, yet haven’t found a case of any asylum seeker raping anyone.

      Whereas I have found two cases of people called Grant being serial rapists. Have you turned yourself over to the police yet?

        • I repeat-where in the article you listed did it show that perpetrators were asylum seekers? Or for you, does evidence of close enough equal good enough?

          And yes, it is easy to fidn reports of rapists being Muslims if you:
          A) Presume everyone with a dark skin is a Muslim, even if they’re Sikh (Or, presumably, from the medeterrenean)
          B) Only go looking for those cases.

          Similarly, I believe there is a website called “whitewatch” which sets out to prove all white males are rapists and paedophiles, and it does so by only looking for cases of white people beign rapists.
          Now, Grant, I think both what you are doing and white watch is doing is racist, tarring the majority by the minority, and generally bigoted.

          Now it’s up for you to explain why what the website “whitewatch” is doing is entirely evil and wrong, while what you are doing is okay (Look forward to that), or, alternatively, telling us you think the website whitewatch, and the premise it draws from is just as fair as your beliefs, and therefore you will report to your local police station as a potential rapist. Which will it be?

    • Grant, that’s a poor example. If you are Nick Folkes behind a poor pseudonym, or if you know Nick Folkes and watched the SBS Insight show, you will know that at the time these rapes occurred, the highest per capita incidence of rape was in the NSW North Coast – and not only slightly, but very much higher than any area of non-white ethnicity.

      You’re full of shit and you know it.

      How about some real facts.

      The Women’s Safety Survey was conducted between February and April 1996 and published in 1996. The survey relied on face-to-face interviews with a random sample of approximately 6,300 women in Australia, aged 18 years and over, who were living in a private dwelling in urban and rural Australia (non-English speaking women were interviewed over the phone with the assistance of an interpreter). The survey investigated women’s experiences of physical and sexual violence in the last 12 months, and since the age of 15. It was estimated that, of women living in Australia aged 18 and over:

      * 100,000 (1.5%) experienced an incident of sexual assault in the 12 months prior to the study.
      * 99% of the perpetrators of sexual violence incidents experienced in the 12 months prior to the survey were men.
      * Women in the 18-24 year age bracket were more likely to be assaulted than women in other age-groups: 19% of women aged 18-24 had experienced sexual violence in the past 12 months, compared with 6.8% of women aged 35-44 and 1.2% of women aged 55 and over.
      * Only 15% of women who identified an incident of sexual assault in the 12 months prior to the survey reported to police.
      * An estimated 1.2 million women in Australia aged 18 and over had experienced sexual violence or its threat since the age of 15. More specifically, one in six adult women in Australia had experienced sexual assault since the age of 15 years.
      * 45% of women sexually assaulted since the age of 15 had experienced more than one incident.
      * Sexual assaults occurring since the age of 15 were most commonly committed by a man known to the victim, and usually occurred in a home.
      1 in 10 women who had ever been in a relationship disclosed an incident of sexual violence by an intimate partner.

      Or try this one…

      Experiences across women’s lifetimes (IVAWS) survey

      *Over half of the women surveyed (57%) had experienced at least one incident of physical or sexual violence over their lifetime.
      * More than a third of women (34%) had experienced this violence from a former or current partner, although violence from a former partner was more common, and more likely to result in women being injured and feeling that their lives were in danger.
      * 12% of women reported experiencing sexual violence by an intimate partner (current or former) over their lifetimes, including instances of attempted (3%) and completed (6%) forced intercourse (i.e. rape).
      * Women who had experienced sexual violence by their intimate partners were also likely to have been physically abused by them (73%).
      * 18% of women reported being sexually abused before the age of 16:
      - almost 2% of women identified parents (fathers in all but two cases) as the perpetrators, while a further 16% identified someone other than a parent. The results suggest that the risk of sexual violence in adulthood doubles for women who experience child abuse.
      * 27% of women reported sexual violence by non-intimates such as other close family members, relatives, friends, colleagues and strangers (although a number of women reported violence from both intimate partners and others). 7% of these women reported attempted forced intercourse and 4 percent reported forced intercourse over their lifetime.

      * Only 1% of the women surveyed identified having been raped by a stranger.

  11. To summarise Grant’s position:

    1. He doesn’t like Muslims.
    2. He believes the only way Muslims immigrate to Australia is as asylum seekers (shoppers), entering as IMAs.
    3. He belives that all IMAs are Muslim.
    4. Once here, all Muslims get jobs as Taxi Drivers.
    5. They all then use this position to rape women.

    Have I missed anything?

    • So after many many times asking for proof of asylum seekers being morel ikely to rape someone than an Australian born citizen, and no doubt hours of your searching, probably ringing up every APP member you can find, you finally manage to find one case of an asylum seeker being a rapist.

      Congratulations (Not as impressive as my finding two serial rapists called Grant, but there you go).

      But you know what happens to this particular rapist. He gets deported. He doesn’t get to stay in Australia anymore. He doesn’t have citizenship, so we after he completes his prison sentence, we deport him.

      Now, what happens to an Australian born rapist-like that Grant character we mention earlier? He goes to prison, with the constant possibility he may be released into the community. He can’t and won’t be deported, so here he will stay.

      So please tell me, Grant, considering any non-citizen who is convicted of rape in this country is likely to be deported, and any citizen who commits rape can’t be deported-how are asylum seekers more of a threat than Australian citizens?

      Oh, and also, could you provide proof that the majority of even a greater proportion compared to the national average, of asylum seekers are rapists?

  12. http://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/news/local/news/crime-and-law/police-say-bendigo-mother-raped-14-times/2510852.aspx

    POLICE allege a Bendigo mother of two was subjected to repeated sexual assault at the hands of six youths who dragged her into a laundry and took turns raping her, a court has heard.
    Mohammed Elnour, 19, Akoak Manon, 19, and Mohammed Zaoli, 22, all appeared in the Bendigo Magistrates Court yesterday charged with a long list of sex offences stemming from the alleged gang rape in January last year.

    More muslim rapists.

    • Dude-it doesn’t even mention Asylum seeker OR Muslim.

      Unless you’re telling us that every resident of a Medeteranean country is a Muslim and an asylum seeker. Go ahead and tell that to your coptic Christian friends you say you have (When you’re not sayign they’re Muslims of course!).

  13. A further link to the darwin incident:

    http://www.ntnews.com.au/article/2011/12/16/278625_ntnews.html

    A DETAINEE has today been charged over the alleged touching up of six primary school girls at the Darwin Wave Pool on Tuesday.

    The 28-year-old man was charged with one count of indecent dealing with a child under 16 and five counts of indecent assault.

    The man, believed to be Iranian, is an inmate of the Northern Immigration Detention Centre.
    Three primary girls eh?

    Seems they like em young eh? Just like the prophet. ( No co-incidence of course)

  14. So after the do gooder suckers take these bludgers into their houses; be sure to post the rape incidents here: ( I wait the impending news)

    • And if you’re wrong, what will you do, Grant? If there’s no upswing in rape cases, will you go “I was wrong-I now will quit the APP out of shame”-or will you pretend you never made a mistake and carry on regardless.

  15. Upswing or not, there will be rapes by these Muslims, be they detainee or not.

    Judging with the ease that i found these cases, rapes by Muslims & other cultural enrichers, are common & are almost always perpetrated on white women.

    Multiculturalists are importing muslim rapists & sikh & indian .

    Case closed.

    Will i take some detainees? Absolutely not. It’s not my problem.

    It’s your problem.

    soon gillard will find out it’s a problem that will see her annilhilated in 18 months.

    • And judging by the ease in which I found people called Grant, or people who might be called Grant, rape cases, it seems clear to me that people called Grant rape, and they are always serial rapists.

      Case closed. After all, if your random cases picked in particular to condemn Muslims (Even though they’re not all Muslims) prove that all non-whites are raping white women (Especially if you ignore the studies finding rapes more common amongst people who are known), then surely my cases picked in particular to condemn people called Grant are proof that people called Grant are serial rapists, right?

      “Multiculturalists are importing muslim rapists & sikh & indian .”

      And people who are called grant are apparently raping repeatedly.

      “Will i take some detainees? Absolutely not. It’s not my problem.”

      Cool-no one would want to live in your Mum’s basement anyway. But you’re not saying “We need to help the detainees” so we never expected this. You’ve been saying “We need to help the homeless”-so what’s your plan for that? How are you Grant, or your party, the APP, help the homeless?

  16. http://www.couriermail.com.au/ipad/cabbie-denies-touching-teen/story-fn6ck51p-1226196057686

    This time, another Indian.

    A TAXI driver sexually assaulted an 18-year-old female passenger after she bought him a meal and rejected his sexual advances, a jury has been told.

    A Brisbane District Court jury was told Satpal Singh Dhaliwal allegedly assaulted the passenger after taking her and a female friend from the Regatta Hotel to her home at Mt Ommaney, 15km southwest of Brisbane, in the early hours of January 6 this year.

    • You need to read the articles you post before you post them:

      “The overall statistics give the lie to such claims. Greater Manchester Police, in whose area the offences took place, has declared that 95 per cent of the men on its sex offenders register are white. Just five per cent are Asian”

      95% of sex offenders in Manchester are white! Surely that’s the epidemic Grant is worrying about!

      • you should do the same idiot;
        “Various newspapers have quoted research by two academics at the Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science at University College London (UCL). Their research, which examined the 18 trials mentioned earlier, showed that of the 56 people found guilty of crimes including rape, child abduction, indecent assault and sex with a child, 53 were Asian. Of those, 50 were Muslim and a majority were members of the British Pakistani community. Most of the victims have been white, although in one case several Bangladeshi Muslim girls were also abused.”

        • You like to selectively quote don’t you suckass.

          Sadly for you The Independent goes on to say:

          The overall statistics give the lie to such claims. Greater Manchester Police, in whose area the offences took place, has declared that 95 per cent of the men on its sex offenders register are white. Just five per cent are Asian.

          and
          …the judge also made it clear that such an interpretation should not have too much weight placed upon it. “Some of you, when arrested, said it was triggered by race,” he continued. “That is nonsense. What triggered this prosecution was your lust and greed.

          and

          However, the picture presented by the academics, Ella Cockbain and Helen Brayley, looks a lot less clear. “The citations are correct but they have been taken out of context,” says Ms Cockbain. “Nor do they acknowledge the small sample size of the original research, which focused on just two large cases.”

          and

          “There has been a shift from the men selling children in ones or twos to something that is much more organised in groups and networks. The networks of men come from different backgrounds: in the North and Midlands many have been British Asians; in Devon it was white men; in Bath and Bristol, Afro-Caribbeans; in London, all ethnic mixes, whites, Iraqis, Kurds, Afghans, Somalis.

          “The danger with saying that the problem is with one ethnicity is that then people will only be on the lookout for that group – and will risk missing other threats.”

          So what are you neo-Fascists going to do about the problem society has with MEN? What does your Fascism say to MEN about their behaviour?

        • Mr suck on this, you have two quotes in front of you.

          One says a study shows the majority of those convicted of sexual assault crimes to be sian Muslims.

          The other states that the vast majority of sexual assault crimes are committed by white men. Now, both are in your article, so what do you think it means?

          Could it be that it is harder to prosecute a white male in england, due to the likelihood a defence lawyer will be indicating ways in which a victim was “asking for it”, leading to a victim being humiliated for…nothing? It seems like to me the two quotes put together show a greater threat on non-white rapists, and they’re apparently getting away with their rape. Right?

          I mean, which is more threatening to public-the rapist who has been caught, convicted and sentenced, or the rapist who was caught, but got away with it?

        • Men like Alyas Karmani are trying to get the British Asian community to address a problem from which, he admits, it has been in denial. But it is not enough simply to point the finger at Asians, as Wendy Shepherd points out. Her long experience with Barnardo’s shows that if you scratch the surface you’ll find some pretty appalling attitudes towards women in the white community too.
          “It’s not that long ago that a man could get drunk on a Sunday lunchtime and go home and give his wife a beating and people would accept that as normal,” Wendy Shepherd says. “The danger with saying that the problem is with one ethnicity is that then people will only be on the look-out for that group – and risk missing other threats.”

          Child sex abusers come from all backgrounds.
          Greater Manchester Police Assistant Chief Constable Steve Heywood said after the Rochdale convictions that his force was investigating other cases of on-street grooming which did not involve British Pakistanis. “Our experience shows us that all communities need to be vigilant to this issue.” Without that many more children will suffer at the hands of such men.

          Men again. From all cultures and ethnicities. What do you Fascists say to that?

    • You’re a bit obsessed with this aren’t you. What’s up, jealous? Your missus says no? You a bit of a dud root?

  17. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/girl-forced-to-have-sex-with-20-men/story-e6freuy9-1226350573453

    One more, from the UK.

    Take a look at those photos eh.

    As usual the victims are white.

    “A SEX grooming gang targeted white girls because they were not part of their ‘community or religion’ said a judge as he jailed them for a total of 77 years yesterday. ”

    “Abdul Aziz, 41, from Rochdale, was found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking for sexual exploitation and not guilty of two counts of rape. Kabeer Hassan, 25, of Oldham, was found guilty of conspiracy and rape. Adil Khan, 42, of Rochdale, was found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking for sexual exploitation. Abdul Rauf, 43, of Rochdale, was found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking for sexual exploitation. Mohammed Sajid, 35, of Rochdale, was found guilty of conspiracy, trafficking, one count of rape and one count of sexual activity with a child. Abdul Qayyum, 44, of Rochdale, was found guilty of conspiracy. Mohammed Amin, 45, Rochdale, was found guilty of conspiracy and sexual assault. Hamid Safi, 22, was found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking but not guilty of two counts of rape. “

    • Here’s a story or two from the UK, Grant. We can go punch for punch all day if you want.

      Until you provide stats, posting links to news articles can easily be done on both sides of the equation.

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1218804/Woman-teacher-exposed-predatory-paedophile-sexually-abused-young-children-followed-public-toilets.html

      “An apparently respectable woman teacher has been exposed as a ‘predatory paedophile’ who sexually assaulted children 100 times.

      “Carole Clarke, 46, has told police that she systematically attacked boys and girls over a 17-year period by following them into public toilets.

      “The offences were primarily committed against youngsters aged between four and seven and she always acted alone, Grimsby Crown Court was told.”

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/oct/01/vanessa-george-plymouth-abuse-background

      “[Vanessa] George and [Colin] Blanchard probably met in cyberspace in the late summer or autumn of 2008 and quickly developed a close, deeply disturbing bond.

      “Somehow ‑ police are not sure how ‑ they realised they shared a fascination with dark sexual fantasies and child abuse. And George’s job meant she had access to very young children.

      “George began to find time alone with children at Little Ted’s, sometimes when she changed their nappies. She sexually assaulted them and used the camera on her mobile phone to record the abuse. She used objects found at the nursery in the assaults, but also smuggled a sex toy in for at least one attack.”

    • Grant, what’s your opinion on bringing in Muslim women? There’s plenty of female asylum seekers trying to flee their home counteies, some of them will have no chance, even if their life is being threatened, because gender is not a listed reason to fear for persecution.

      And as I think we can both agree who commites the vast majority of rapes in this country (ie Men), surely if we allowed in more female asylum seekers and refugees, we’d both be happy, right?

      And even if they have children in Australia, they would be no more likely to rape than anyone else-unless you’re telling us there is a “rape” gene hardwired into people’s DNA?

  18. I find it funny that the APP is so vehemently opposed to immigrants and multiculturalism yet the head of the APP in Sydney is the son of a Russian mail-order bride who contributed absolutely nothing to society when she was imported here, other than a son and daughter who are a stain on our country, and also did not work but leeched off the welfare system.

What do YOU think about this?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s